Cited by 79Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Epigenetic Regulation of Aging in Honeybee Workers

Omholt, Stig W., Amdam, Gro V.·2004·Science of Aging Knowledge Environment

Abstract

Aging and longevity are complex life history traits that are influenced by both genes and environment and exhibit significant phenotypic plasticity in a broad range of organisms. A striking example of this plasticity is seen in social insects, such as ants and bees, where different castes can have very different life spans. In particular, the honeybee worker offers an intriguing example of environmental control on aging rate, because workers are conditionally sterile and display very different aging patterns depending on which temporal caste they belong to (hive bee, forager, or a long-lived caste capable of surviving for several months on honey alone). The ubiquitous yolk protein vitellogenin appears to play a key role in the regulatory circuitry that controls this variation. Here we outline the current understanding of the relation between vitellogenin and somatic maintenance in honeybee workers, and how this relation can be understood in a life history context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sageke.2004.26.pe28

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In controlled laboratory settings, social contact is linked to longer lifespan across many social species, including insects, rodents, and primates.

    “Even in controlled laboratory environments (where external threats to survival are absent), the presence of social contact is associated with increased lifespan across a range of social species including honeybees, ants, Drosophila melanogaster22,23, mice24,25, and rats26–28, as well as in free-ranging groups of macaques29, and baboons30.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Omholt, S. W., & Amdam, G. V.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Venue
Science of Aging Knowledge Environment
Published
2004-06-30
Volume
2004
Issue
26
Pages
pe28-pe28
ISSN
1539-6150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969605870
Cited by
79
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science of Aging Knowledge Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
epigenetic regulation, aging, honeybee workers, vitellogenin, longevity, life history, somatic maintenance, social insects
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Bees, Behavior, Animal, Biological Evolution, Feeding Behavior, Female, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Vitellogenins, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review