CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heralded quantum steering over a high-loss channel

Weston, Morgan M., Slussarenko, Sergei, Chrzanowski, Helen M., Wollmann, Sabine, Shalm, Lynden K., Verma, Varun B., Allman, Michael S., Nam, Sae Woo, Pryde, Geoff J.·2018·Science Advances
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1701230PMC PMC5756093
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Entanglement swapping enables verified nonlocal correlations over a high-loss channel with the detection loophole closed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.1701230

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The maximum number of entanglement bits that can be distributed over a lossy channel with transmissivity T is log2(1-T) ebits per channel use.

    “This is a fundamental limitation imposed by quantum mechanics: the maximum number of entanglement bits (ebits) that can be distributed over a lossy channel with transmissivity T is in fact equal tolog 2 (1 -T ) ebits per channel use [392].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [392]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. M. Nielsen I. Chuang Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge Series on Information and the Natural Sciences (Cambridge Univ. Press 2000).
  2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 · DOI · Paper page
  3. T. C. Ralph, G. J. Pryde, Optical quantum computation. Prog. Opt. 54, 209–269 (2009). · DOI
  4. D. Rideout, T. Jennewein, G. Amelino-Camelia, T. F. Demarie, B. L. Higgins, A. Kempf, A. Kent, R. Laflamme, X. Ma, R. B. Mann, E. Martín-Martínez, N. C. Menicucci, J. Moffat, C. Simon, R. Sorkin, L. Smolin, D. R. Terno, Fundamental quantum optics experiments conceivable with satellites—Reaching relativistic distances and velocities. Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 224011 (2012). · DOI
  5. P. M. Alsing, I. Fuentes, Observer-dependent entanglement. Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 224001 (2012). · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405 · DOI · Paper page
  7. C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman, One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering, Phys. Rev. A 85, 010301 010301 (2012). · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.50 · DOI
  9. 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424003 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nature15759 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1418 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 · DOI · Paper page
  15. R. Kaltenbaek, R. Prevedel, M. Aspelmeyer, A. Zeilinger, High-fidelity entanglement swapping with fully independent sources. Phys. Rev. A 79, 040302(R) (2009). · DOI
  16. R.-B. Jin, M. Takeoka, U. Takagi, R. Shimizu, M. Sasaki, Highly efficient entanglement swapping and teleportation at telecom wavelength. Sci. Rep. 5, 9333 (2015). · DOI
  17. H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty, Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007). · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nphys1766 · DOI
  19. B. Wittmann, S. Ramelow, F. Steinlechner, N. K. Langford, N. Brunner, H. M. Wiseman, R. Ursin, A. Zeilinger, Loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment via quantum steering. New J. Phys. 14, 053030 (2012). · DOI
  20. A. J. Bennet, D. A. Evans, D. J. Saunders, C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde, Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole. Phys. Rev. X 2, 031003 (2012).
  21. S. Kocsis, G. Y. Xiang, T. C. Ralph, G. J. Pryde, Heralded noiseless amplification of a photon polarization qubit. Nat. Phys. 9, 23–28 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  22. A. E. Ulanov, I. A. Fedorov, A. A. Pushkina, Y. V. Kurochkin, T. C. Ralph, A. I. Lvovsky, Undoing the effect of loss on quantum entanglement. Nat. Photonics 9, 764–768 (2015). · DOI
  23. E. Meyer-Scott, D. McCloskey, K. Gołos, J. Z. Salvail, K. A. G. Fisher, D. R. Hamel, A. Cabello, K. J. Resch, T. Jennewein, Certifying the presence of a photonic qubit by splitting it in two. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070501 (2016). · DOI
  24. M. M. Weston, H. M. Chrzanowski, S. Wollmann, A. Boston, J. Ho, L. K. Shalm, V. B. Verma, M. S. Allman, S. W. Nam, R. B. Patel, S. Slussarenko, G. J. Pryde. Efficient and pure femtosecond-pulse-length source of polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Express 24, 10869–10879 (2016). · DOI
  25. A. G. White, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O’Brien, M. J. Bremner, N. K. Langford, Measuring two-qubit gates. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 172–183 (2007). · DOI
  26. Q.-L. Wu, N. Namekata, S. Inoue, High-fidelity entanglement swapping at telecommunication wavelengths. J. Phys. B 46, 235503 (2013). · DOI
  27. S. Kocsis, M. J. W. Hall, A. J. Bennet, D. J. Saunders, G. J. Pryde, Experimental measurement-device-independent verification of quantum steering. Nat. Commun. 6, 5886 (2015). · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.13 · DOI
  29. J. Fulconis, O. Alibart, W. J. Wadsworth, J. G. Rarity, Quantum interference with photon pairs using two micro-structured fibres. New J. Phys. 9, 276 (2007). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weston, M. M., Slussarenko, S., Chrzanowski, H. M., Wollmann, S., Shalm, L. K., Verma, V. B., Allman, M. S., Nam, S. W., & Pryde, G. J.
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2018-01-05
Volume
4
Issue
1
ISSN
2375-2548
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.1701230
PMC
PMC5756093
Cited by
35
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (award351633, DP140100648, award351634, CE110001027)
  • Australian Government Research Training Program (award359335)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review