Cited by 359Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 39 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Aβ deposition is associated with increases in soluble and phosphorylated tau that precede a positive tau PET in Alzheimer's disease

Open access

Abstract

Aβ pathology may induce changes in soluble tau release and phosphorylation, which is later followed by tau aggregation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In the Swedish BioFINDER Tau PET substudy, Aβ deposition was associated with early increases in CSF soluble and phosphorylated tau, especially P-tau217, before Tau PET became positive. These soluble tau changes statistically mediated the relationship between Amyloid PET and Tau PET, suggesting a window before significant PHF-tau aggregation.

Key findings

  • Among 131 participants, Aβ+ CU had higher CSF P-tau181, P-tau217, and T-tau than Aβ− CU (P ≤ 0.0001) but did not differ on Tau PET measures. In Aβ+ CU, positivity was 70.0% for CSF P-tau217, 55.0% for P-tau181, 22.5% for T-tau, and only 2.5% for Tau PET ITC.
  • Isolated CSF P-tau positivity with negative Tau PET was common (28.2 to 51.1%), whereas isolated Tau PET positivity was rare (0.8 to 3.1%). In Tau PET–negative CU with an early CSF sample a median of 3.8 years before Tau PET, 56.3% of Aβ+ were positive for P-tau217, 25.0% for P-tau181, and 9.4% for T-tau; 0% of Aβ− CU were positive.
  • Aβ+ CU showed greater yearly increases than Aβ− CU in CSF P-tau217 [median 13.42 ng/liter/year (IQR, 4.94 to 22.12)], P-tau181 [7.06 (3.09 to 14.29)], and T-tau [10.65 (1.96 to 22.78)]. Spline thresholds showed CSF P-tau217 increased at 0.679 SUVR, P-tau181 at 0.684 SUVR, and T-tau at 0.695 SUVR, before the Amyloid PET positivity threshold of 0.743 SUVR; Tau PET increased at 0.772 SUVR (ITC) or 0.859 SUVR (Braak V–VI).
  • P-tau217 and P-tau181 mediated 82% and 68% of the Amyloid PET effect on Tau PET, respectively; T-tau mediated 41%. In 5xFAD mice, CSF T-tau increased at 4 months despite no tau aggregates, and 12 of 12 MAPT mutation carriers had normal CSF P-tau, with 10 of 12 normal CSF T-tau.

Methods

  • Prospective Swedish BioFINDER Tau PET substudy of 131 participants: 18 Aβ− CU, 40 Aβ+ CU, 38 Aβ+ with mild cognitive deficits (CDR 0.5), and 35 Aβ+ AD dementia (CDR 1 to 3), plus 12 MAPT mutation carriers. Measures included CSF T-tau, P-tau181, P-tau217, Tau368, 18F-flutemetamol Amyloid PET, 18F-flortaucipir Tau PET, MRI, and longitudinal subsets.
  • Main analyses used linear regression adjusted for age and sex, nonlinear spline models for continuous Amyloid PET thresholds, mediation analysis, and longitudinal models. Cut points were defined as mean plus two SDs in independent Aβ− CU cohorts. Mouse experiments used 5xFAD mice and nontransgenic littermates with CSF T-tau and Thioflavin S plaque quantification.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: lack of neuropathology to verify correlations between tau measures and brain changes; the longitudinal part was relatively small and differed between CSF and Tau PET measures; sensitivity may differ across techniques, and future studies are needed to compare CSF P-tau with interstitial fluid or brain tissue P-tau.
  • Evident from the text: the human findings are observational and do not prove causality; the 5xFAD mouse model does not develop tau aggregates and CSF P-tau could not be measured in mice; the cohort was drawn from a memory-clinic/BioFINDER setting, which may limit generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2387

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 42 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 20
56 of 56
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Only limited data exist from humans on the temporal relationships between development of Aβ plaques and altered release, phosphorylation, and aggregation of tau.

    “but only limited data exist from humans on the temporal relationships between development of Aβ plaques and altered release, phosphorylation, and aggregation of tau.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 5xFAD transgenic mouse model's CSF tau changes in response to Aβ pathology are informative about the human relationship between Aβ pathology and soluble tau.

    “To corroborate the findings from humans, we studied changes in CSF tau in a transgenic mice model of AD (5xFAD).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Global cortical 18F-flutemetamol Amyloid PET represents Aβ fibrillar plaque load.

    “continuous 18F-flutemetamol (Amyloid) PET (representing Aβ fibrillar plaque load; Fig. 3)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tau PET represents PHF-tau.

    “Tau PET (representing PHF-tau)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CSF concentrations of tau proteins reflect tau metabolism in the brain.

    “To conclude, the CSF levels of tau proteins, especially P-tau217 and P-tau181, are increased in response to Aβ deposition in humans in early stages of AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 5xFAD mouse model recapitulates aspects of Aβ-induced tau changes relevant to human AD.

    “Some of the findings from humans could be translated back to 5xFAD mice”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aβ status defined by the CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio reflects brain Aβ pathology.

    “The CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (using EUROIMMUN data) was used to define Aβ status, with a previously defined cut point (<0.1) to define positivity (42).”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Longitudinal CSF statistical comparison is cited as Fig. 3 instead of Fig. 2

    Minor

    The text directs readers to Fig. 3 for the adjusted comparison of longitudinal CSF tau changes, but the Fig. 2 caption reports that comparison. Fig. 3 instead concerns tau measures in relation to Amyloid PET load.

  • Mouse CSF tau increase is cited to the wrong Fig. 5 panel

    Minor

    The text cites Fig. 5A for the increase in CSF tau at 4 months, but the figure caption identifies panel A as plaque staining and panel B as the CSF T-tau measurements.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 359

Metadata

Authors
Mattsson-Carlgren, N., Andersson, E., Janelidze, S., Ossenkoppele, R., Insel, P., Strandberg, O., Zetterberg, H., Rosen, H. J., Rabinovici, G., Chai, X., Blennow, K., Dage, J. L., Stomrud, E., Smith, R., Palmqvist, S., & Hansson, O.
Affiliations
  • Clinical Memory Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Hansson, Oskar
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2020-04-17
Volume
6
Issue
16
Pages
eaaz2387-eaaz2387
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016877536
Cited by
359
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 23
FWCI
28.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Parkinson Research Foundation
  • H2020 European Research Council
  • Swedish Research Council Formas
  • Konung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias Frimurarestiftelse
  • Region Skåne
  • Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation
  • Swedish Brain Foundation
  • Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
  • the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  • Medical Faculty at Lund University
  • Strategic Research Area MultiPark
  • Swedish Medical Association
  • Skåne University Hospital Foundation
  • Parkinson foundation of Sweden
  • Torsten Söderberg Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta deposition, tau phosphorylation, soluble tau, tau PET, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, tau aggregation, 5xFAD mice, amyloid-beta aggregation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Phosphorylation, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review