Cited by 80DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryDNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Multistep mechanism of G-quadruplex resolution during DNA replication

Open access
Sato, Koichi, Martin-Pintado, Nerea, Post, Harm, Altelaar, Maarten, Knipscheer, Puck·2021·Science Advances

Abstract

DNA helicases DHX36 and FANCJ constitute a previously unknown pathway that resolves G-quadruplex structures during DNA replication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.abf8653

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Further reports demonstrated that G4s cause replication-dependent DNA-damage or change the overall chromatin structure.

    “Further reports demonstrated that G4s cause replication-dependent DNA-damage or change the overall chromatin structure (66,67).”

    From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction reports that DNA damage induced by G4-stabilizing ligands is replication dependent. The Discussion links G4-related polymerase stalling to possible replication-associated breaks, but also says that G4 structures do not directly cause an accumulation of DNA damage under unperturbed conditions. The claim omits those conditions and presents the damage link more categorically than this paper does. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [28]E. Izbicka, R. T. Wheelhouse, E. Raymond, K. K. Davidson, R. A. Lawrence, D. Sun, B. E. Windle, L. H. Hurley, D. D. Von Hoff, Effects of cationic porphyrins as G-quadruplex interactive agents in human tumor cells. Cancer Res. 59, 639– 644 (1999). 9973212
  2. [31]C. Alabert, J. C. Bukowski-Wills, S. B. Lee, G. Kustatscher, K. Nakamura, F. de Lima Alves, P. Menard, J. Mejlvang, J. Rappsilber, A. Groth, Nascent chromatin capture proteomics determines chromatin dynamics during DNA replication and identifies unknown fork components. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 281– 291 (2014). 24561620 PMC4283098
  3. [39]M. Räschle, P. Knipscheer, M. Enoiu, T. Angelov, J. Sun, J. D. Griffith, T. E. Ellenberger, O. D. Scharer, J. C. Walter, Mechanism of replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell 134, 969– 980 (2008). 18805090 PMC2748255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, K., Martin-Pintado, N., Post, H., Altelaar, M., & Knipscheer, P.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute–KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Uppsalalaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CT, Netherlands.
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Knipscheer, Puck
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
7
Issue
39
Pages
eabf8653-eabf8653
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199434918
Cited by
80
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (184.034.019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
DNA replication, genome stability, CMG helicase, Cdc45, MCM2-7 complex, GINS, DHX36, FANCJ, leading strand, lagging strand, genome maintenance, Xenopus egg extracts
MeSH terms
DNA Replication, DNA Helicases, Fanconi Anemia, Humans, S Phase, Genomic Instability, G-Quadruplexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review