Cited by 133DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryDNA Repair MechanismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

Mutagenic consequences of a single G-quadruplex demonstrate mitotic inheritance of DNA replication fork barriers

Open access
Lemmens, Bennie, van Schendel, Robin, Tijsterman, Marcel·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Faithful DNA replication is vital to prevent disease-causing mutations, chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation. However, accuracy conflicts with pace and flexibility and cells rely on specialized polymerases and helicases to ensure effective and timely replication of genomes that contain DNA lesions or secondary structures. If and how cells can tolerate a permanent barrier to replication is, however, unknown. Here we show that a single unresolved G-quadruplexed DNA structure can persist through multiple mitotic divisions without changing conformation. Failed replication across a G-quadruplex causes single-strand DNA gaps that give rise to DNA double-strand breaks in subsequent cell divisions, which are processed by polymerase theta (POLQ)-mediated alternative end joining. Lineage tracing experiments further reveal that persistent G-quadruplexes cause genetic heterogeneity during organ development. Our data demonstrate that a single lesion can cause multiple unique genomic rearrangements, and that alternative end joining enables cells to proliferate in the presence of mitotically inherited replication blocks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms9909

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increased frequency of SNVs can disrupt the normal function and regulation of genes, potentially leading to the development and progression of cancer.

    “In this context, we considered local cSNV or dbSNV enrichment as marker for local genomic instability, as an increased frequency of SNVs can disrupt the normal function and regulation of genes, potentially leading to the development and progression of cancer (58).”

    From G-quadruplex-mediated genomic instability drives SNVs in cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Abstract reports G-quadruplex-induced deletions, and the Discussion compares more extensive rearrangements with those found in cancer cells. Neither passage addresses whether an increased frequency of SNVs disrupts gene function or regulation and contributes to cancer development or progression; searches for SNVs, point mutations, and those cancer effects found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Raschle M. et al. Mechanism of replication-coupled DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell 134, 969– 980 (2008). 18805090 PMC2748255
  2. Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71– 94 (1974). 4366476 PMC1213120

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lemmens, B., van Schendel, R., & Tijsterman, M.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Tijsterman, Marcel
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-11-13
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
8909-8909
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2296534952
Cited by
133
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • ZonMw
  • National Institutes of Health (OD010440, P40OD010440)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (203379)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
G-quadruplex, mitotic inheritance, mutagenesis, DNA double-strand breaks, alternative end-joining, polymerase theta, genome rearrangement, lineage tracing, DNA secondary structure, DNA damage tolerance
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Replication, Mitosis, Mutagenesis, Caenorhabditis elegans, Cell Proliferation, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, G-Quadruplexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review