Cited by 129Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchTree-ring climate responses

The boon and bane of radiocarbon dating

Guilderson, Tom P., Reimer, Paula J., Brown, Tom A.·2005·Science

Abstract

TEST 02 - Elsevier's Scopus, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature. Search and access research from the science, technology, medicine, social sciences and arts and humanities fields.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1104164

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guilderson, T. P., Reimer, P. J., & Brown, T. A.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2005-01-21
Volume
307
Issue
5708
Pages
362-364
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1896866191
Cited by
129
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
radiocarbon dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review