The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market
Abstract
Hit songs, books, and movies are many times more successful than average, suggesting that “the best” alternatives are qualitatively different from “the rest”; yet experts routinely fail to predict which products will succeed. We investigated this paradox experimentally, by creating an artificial “music market” in which 14,341 participants downloaded previously unknown songs either with or without knowledge of previous participants' choices. Increasing the strength of social influence increased both inequality and unpredictability of success. Success was also only partly determined by quality: The best songs rarely did poorly, and the worst rarely did well, but any other result was possible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rosen's economics of superstars [21] shows formally that when the cost of serving additional consumers approaches zero, cultural markets concentrate rewards on a small number of winners regardless of marginal quality differences”
From AI as a Democratizing Force in Indie Game Development (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The market-structure literature of §2.4 predicts what follows: superstar concentration under near-zero marginal cost [21], against which the long-tail alternative [22] is directly testable with the outcome data of Table 13, and choice-abundant markets whose winners are selected by social dynamics rather than quality gradients [23].”
From AI as a Democratizing Force in Indie Game Development (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“When considering inequality in heterogeneous populations, there are two distinct aspects to take into account-the dispersion of outcomes and the predictability of outcomes (Lynn, Podolny, & Tao, 2009;Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006).”
From Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment on Topcoder (2022) · cites this paper as Salganik, Dodds, & Watts, 2006
In the citing paper
“In the case of an inherent quality or virtue, more predictable outcomes imply more equality and fairness (Cook & Hegtvedt, 1983;Jasso, 1983;Salganik et al., 2006).”
From Relative Feedback Increases Disparities in Effort and Performance in Crowdsourcing Contests: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment on Topcoder (2022) · cites this paper as Salganik et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“However, social success and quality of content are only partly correlated (Salganik et al., 2006).”
From Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media. (2024) · cites this paper as Salganik et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“in a classic experiment, the popularity of all but the very best and worst songs was shown to be more related to stochastic early positive reception by other users than by their inherent quality”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [87]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the presence of a significant number of neutral individuals holding a random opinion and a low confidence level around these two attractive forces tends to increase the unpredictability of the final outcome [15].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“In agreement with previous works [15], the collective outcome appears to be poorly predictable and strongly dependent on the initial conditions [36].”
From Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation (2013) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“Although there is on average a positive relationship between quality and success [66]”
From Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“the ultimate winners in such contests are determined not only by the intrinsic value of the work but also by more intangible social variables [66].”
From Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cites
Riggins, F. J., & Mitra, S. (1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,590
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
A simple model of global cascades on random networks
Watts, D. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082090499 · Cited by 2,673
Self-citationA Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. A., & Welch, I. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261849 · Cited by 1,980
(1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511663901 · Cited by 1,774
(2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1kz4h99.12 · Cited by 1,685
Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task.
Bond, R. A., & Smith, P. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111 · Cited by 1,466
Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems
Hirsch, P. M. (1972) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225192 · Cited by 1,331
Walker, D. M., Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1996) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061199 · Cited by 1,180
Allison, P. D. (1978) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094626 · Cited by 1,133
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- R. E. Caves Creative Industries (Harvard Univ. Press Cambridge MA 2000).
- S. Rosen, Am. Econ. Rev.71, 845 (1981).
- M. Adler, Am. Econ. Rev.75, 208 (1985).
- L. R. Anderson, C. A. Holt, Am. Econ. Rev.87, 847 (1997).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,101–2,200 of 2,217
Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare
(2023) · The Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision-Making · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603202
“Because of algorithmic curation, trained on collective social feedback [20], our choices are converging.”
BackgroundSelection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603200
Additional file 1 of Success and luck in creative careers
Janosov, M., Battiston, F., & Sinatra, R. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12262646
Harms, A.-K., & Wilpers, S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48569-6_2 · Cited by 1
Dubach, P. D. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5910263
Yan, Q., Wan, X., & Yang, C. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5996080
Markowitz, D. M., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.70171
Zhong, M., Xie, H., Fang, M., et al. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115283
Shadow Futures: Why Verifiable Work Cannot Signal Value in Path-Dependent EconomiesPreprint
Erlic, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6003994
Tapia, E. (2026) · Population Space and Place · doi:10.1002/psp.70184
“For example, certain actions may make an alternative more appealing for future decision‐makers (Salganik et al. 2006) or broaden the choice set of others by introducing new possibilities (Mouw and Entwisle 2006).”
Winkler, D., Hotz‐Behofsits, C., Wlömert, N., Papies, D., & Liaukonytė, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6143552 · Cited by 1
Should I stay or should I go with them?
Todd, P. M., & Hills, T. T. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aee3786
From Events to Guanxi, to Strong Bridges
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0004
Topics Implicit in the Descriptions
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.005.0003
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0007
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.005.0002
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0001
Multiproduct Dynamic Pricing With Popularity Bias
Lu, Y., Yan, X., & Yu, Y. (2026) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1177/10591478261424035
“To analyze the impact of popularity information, Salganik et al. (2006) conduct an experiment in which participants are divided into two groups: one group is aware of the cumulative download counts of songs, while the other is not.”
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.001.0001
Taking Stock and Looking Ahead
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0008
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0002
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0005
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0003
Fieldwork and Network Interview Instrument
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.005.0001
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197834275.003.0006
The marginal majority effect: When social influence produces lock-in
Gelastopoulos, A., Analytis, P. P., Mens, G. L., & van de Rijt, A. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr4237 · Cited by 5
“The well-known Music Lab experiment (Salganik et al., 2006) was also an early demonstration that ranking items by popularity can affect user behavior and the long term popularity dynamics—in one of the experimental conditions, the songs were ranked by popularity for the users and this had an impact…”
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0002
Beta and Gamma functions and some useful properties
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0017
Urn schemes with expansion into the adjacent possible
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0008
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.002.0006
Mechanisms of innovation from biological to cultural evolution
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0004
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.002.0004
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0009
Entropy, complexity and surprise
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0001
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0011
Taylor’s law for almost Poissonian processes
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0016
Master equation for the Zipf’s law in the Urn Model with Triggering
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0019
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0015
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0022
Heaps’ law in the Urn Model with Triggering
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0018
Pólya’s urns and Laplace’s rule of succession
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0006
Results for the Taylor’s law in the Extended Urn Model with Triggering
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0020
Temporal patterns of innovations: triggering effects, trends and correlations phenomena
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0003
Theorem of Shannon, McMillan, Breiman
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0013
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0010
Statistical compressors: Huffman coding
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0014
Heaps’ law in the Urn Model with Semantic Triggering
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0021
Early urn schemes with innovation: Hoppe’s model and the Dirichlet process
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0007
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0005
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.002.0005
Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191834615.003.0012
Guo, Y., Lin, C., & Li, Y. (2026) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2026.2633216
“Influential users who have large followings or higher credibility have been found to boost the visibility and reach of certain messages (Dewan et al., 2017; Salganik et al., 2006).”
Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2026) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2026.2636831
“Control variables include artist popularity, genre size, market availability, release year, origin-country average artist popularity, and track duration, all of which have known effects on exposure and success (Salganik et al., 2006).”
Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2025-0951 · Cited by 1
Data, learning and privacy in recommendation systems
Mittal, N. (2016) · doi:10.70675/1323eb97z8f63z4dc6z983ezad4c3a6509aa
“[131] talk about how some stories become much more popular than the others.”
BackgroundSystème de recommandation équitable d'oeuvres numériques. En quête de diversité
Lherisson, P.-R. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7efd8362zfab7z48ebza209z41534810f286
L’expérience des biens culturels en régime numérique
Gilliotte, Q. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a5a981dez14e3z481fz8be7z7ae7fb0dd069
So similar but so different. Explaining wage differences between observably similar individuals
Sage, L. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/dc74fd0ez55b4z4e4dzaee3z417ba82ce4da
Interpretable Music Recommender Systems
Afchar, D. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/acfb6676z8613z4e08zad14z98d4a9c2ee74 · Cited by 1
Garnier-Brun, J. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/74a91b5cz7930z4ad0z8fe6z4a88725ceefd
When Talent Is Not Enough: Superstar Careers in the ArtsPreprint
Biondo, A. E., & Pluchino, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6572147
The List Effect: How App-Based Stock Rankings Drive Retail Trading and Market PricesPreprint
Stein, R. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6582150
The Complex Geography of Cultural Networks
Ballatore, A. (2026) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.70077
Artıktay, G. G. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24350-8_14
Rajhi, T. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6736458
Yan, Y., & Chen, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2026.1814966
Lee, J. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116321
Pogrebna, G., & Hills, T. T. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108939010.035
Liu, C. (2026) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108939010.039
Wang, N. (2026) · International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT) · doi:10.1145/3803291.3803298
“This can be supported by empirical research on dual process model [61]; [62].”
Zha, H., Liu, J., Kadziński, M., Huang, J., & Liao, X. (2026) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2026.103612
AlDahoul, N., Karim, H. B. A., & Tan, M. J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6900538
Dijital Etkileşim Kültürünün Duygusal Dönüşümü: Tık Tuzağından Öfke Tuzağına Kavramsal Bir Tartışma
Çelebi, E. (2026) · Medya ve Kültür · doi:10.60077/medkul.1948262
Wu, Y. J., van Zoonen, W., Treem, J. W., et al. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261456236
The long tale of the long tail: The internet as counterforce to cultural homogeneity
Mellody, J. C. (2026) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448261454335
Stopina, A. (2026) · Universal Library of arts and humanities. · doi:10.70315/uloap.ulahu.2026.0303001
From screen to charts: how quality TV boosts indie music’s commercial success
Aliberti, D., & Paolino, C. (2026) · Creative Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/17510694.2026.2700931
Private, but documented: tracing contemporary art galleries through provenance records
Stepanova, E., & Sedino, M. (2026) · Journal of Cultural Economics · doi:10.1007/s10824-025-09573-x
Lauterwasser, S., Nelson, L. K., Gold, J. R., Gates, A. J., & Zippel, K. S. (2026) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432261464637
“…Settles et al. 2021), and “hits” in popular culture are jointly determined by the combination of multiplicative returns of their inherent qualities (Seguin 2023), with randomness and luck in early adoption producing large and persistent inequalities in success (Salganik, Dodds, and Watts 2006).”
The Matthew effect: its definition, measurement, and explanation
Bask, M. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05746-3
“The Music Lab experiment Salganik et al. (2006) examined social influence in cultural markets using an experimental setting in which participants evaluated previously unfamiliar music tracks.”
Mechanisms of change: How focus events reshape online meaning-making
Bodell, M. H., & Menshikova, A. (2026) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2026.102108 · Cited by 2
The Politics of Information Processing
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0007
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0008
Berliner, D. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.001.0001
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0001
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0004
Delegating Information Processing
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0006
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0003
Processing Information from the Public
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0005
What Policymakers Learn from the Public and Why
Berliner, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198995746.003.0002
Nguyen, K. N. D. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7203453
The Low End of High-Tailed “Toys.” Sequences of Markets for Cultural Goods
Hutter, M. (2026) · Cultural economics & the creative economy · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-27566-0_2
Sestak, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7379994
Cultural Factors and Popular Music on Spotify in Different Countries
Kok, K., North, A. C., & Hamamura, T. (2026) · Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2026.2682775
Sestak, K. (2026) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/kor7oi
A systematic framework for popularity prediction of travel short videos
Zhang, J., Ma, L., & Liang, X. (2026) · Memetic Computing · doi:10.1007/s12293-026-00528-z
Chernets, V. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7296358 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Santa Fe Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salganik, Matthew J.
- Dodds, Peter Sheridan
- Watts, Duncan J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2006-02-10
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 5762
- Pages
- 854-856
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2147453867
- Cited by
- 2,231
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 168 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 122
- FWCI
- 116.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- cultural market, social influence, music download, product success, consumer choice
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Behavior, Culture, Forecasting, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Music, Research Design, Social Behavior, Sociology, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
