Cited by 336Medical Education and AdmissionsLegal Education and Practice InnovationsHigher Education Research Studies

Standardized Tests Predict Graduate Students' Success

Kuncel, Nathan R., Hezlett, Sarah A.·2007·Science

Abstract

JD‐Next : A valid and reliable tool to predict diverse students' success in law school ,

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1136618

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The power of standardized achievement tests to predict later academic and occupational outcomes is well-established.

    “The power of standardized achievement tests to predict later academic and occupational outcomes is well-established (Kuncel and Hezlett [2007]; Sackett, Borneman and Connelly [2008]; Willingham [1985]).”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Kuncel and Hezlett [2007]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2007-02-23
Volume
315
Issue
5815
Pages
1080-1081
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1910842452
Cited by
336
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
standardized testing, law school admissions, graduate student success, student diversity, test validity and reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review