Cited by 556Language Development and DisordersHearing Impairment and CommunicationChild and Animal Learning Development

Differences in Early Gesture Explain SES Disparities in Child Vocabulary Size at School Entry

Open access
Rowe, Meredith L., Goldin-Meadow, Susan·2009·Science

Abstract

Children from low-socioeconomic status (SES) families, on average, arrive at school with smaller vocabularies than children from high-SES families. In an effort to identify precursors to, and possible remedies for, this inequality, we videotaped 50 children from families with a range of different SES interacting with parents at 14 months and assessed their vocabulary skills at 54 months. We found that children from high-SES families frequently used gesture to communicate at 14 months, a relation that was explained by parent gesture use (with speech controlled). In turn, the fact that children from high-SES families have large vocabularies at 54 months was explained by children's gesture use at 14 months. Thus, differences in early gesture help to explain the disparities in vocabulary that children bring with them to school.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1167025

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Hoff E Developmental Review 2006 26 55 88
  2. [5]Snow CE Burns S Griffin P Preventing reading difficulties in young children 1998 Washington, DC National Academy Press
  3. [6]Duncan GJ Yeung WJ Brooks-Gunn J Smith JR American Sociological Review 1998 63 406 423
  4. [8]Hoff E Child Development 2003 74 1368 1378 14552403
  5. [10]Bornstein MH Haynes MO Painter KM Journal of Child Language 1998 25 367 393 9770912
  6. [11]Heath SB Stigler JW Shweder RA Herdt G Cultural Psychology: Essays on comparative human development 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 496 519
  7. [12]Huttenlocher J Vasilyeva M Waterfall HR Vevea JL Hedges LV Developmental Psychology 2007 43 1062 1083 17723036
  8. [13]Pan BA Rowe ML Singer JD Snow CE Child Development 2005 76 763 782 16026495
  9. [14]Bates E Language and Context 1976 Orlando Academic Press
  10. [15]Bates E Benigni L Bretherton I Camaioni L Volterra V The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy 1979 New York Academic Press
  11. [16]Rowe ML Özçaliskan S Goldin-Meadow S First Language 2008 28 182 199 PMC2745165 19763249
  12. [19]Namy LL Acredolo L Goodwyn S Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2000 24 63 80
  13. [20]Rowe ML Goldin-Meadow S Developmental Science 2009 12 182 187 19120426 PMC2677374
  14. [21]Baron RM Kenny DA Journal of personality and social psychology 1986 51 6 1173 1182 3806354
  15. [22]McCartney K Burchinal MR Bub KL Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development 2006 71 3 17199773
  16. [23]Preacher KJ Hayes A Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2004 36 717 731 15641418
  17. [25]Butterworth G Grover L Weiskrantz L Thought without language 1988 Oxford Carendon 5 24
  18. [26]Carpenter M Nagell K Tomasello M Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1998 63 5 no. 255 9835078
  19. [27]Iverson JM Goldin-Meadow S Psychological Science 2005 16 368 371 15869695
  20. [28]Goldin-Meadow S Goodrich W Sauer E Iverson J Developmental Science 2007 10 778 785 17973795
  21. [29]Broaders S Cook SW Mitchell Z Goldin-Meadow S Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007 136 539 550 17999569
  22. [30]Cook S Goldin-Meadow S Journal of Cognition and Development 2006 7 211 232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, M. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 South University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Corresponding author
Rowe, Meredith L.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-02-13
Volume
323
Issue
5916
Pages
951-953
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2171849228
Cited by
556
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
38.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD040605, K99HD055522, P01 HD406-05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
gesture use, socioeconomic disparities, school entry, parent-child interaction, early communication, vocabulary development, language inequality, preschool children
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Social Class, Videotape Recording, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review