Cited by 714Nerve injury and regenerationKruppel-like factors researchAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

KLF Family Members Regulate Intrinsic Axon Regeneration Ability

Open access
Moore, Darcie L., Blackmore, Murray G., Hu, Ying, Kaestner, Klaus H., Bixby, John L., Lemmon, Vance P., Goldberg, Jeffrey L.·2009·Science

Abstract

Containing Neuronal Exuberance: In rats and mice, around the time of birth, neurons of the central nervous system switch from a growth mode and lose their ability to regenerate. Studying retinal ganglion cells of the rat, Moore et al. (p. 298 ; see the Perspective by Subang and Richardson ) identified a gene, Krüppel-like factor-4 ( KLF4 ), that seems to contribute to the switch. The KLF4 gene belongs to a family of related transcription factors that possess repressive or enhancing effects on axon growth. The combinatorial effect of this family of transcription factors before and after birth may fine-tune the ability of the neurons to extend axons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1175737

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Bouslama-Oueghlani L Wehrle R Sotelo C Dusart I J Neurosci 23 8318 2003 12967994 PMC6740680

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, D. L., Blackmore, M. G., Hu, Y., Kaestner, K. H., Bixby, J. L., Lemmon, V. P., & Goldberg, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Moore, Darcie L.
  • Blackmore, Murray G.
  • Goldberg, Jeffrey L.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-10-09
Volume
326
Issue
5950
Pages
298-301
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4247333492
Cited by
714
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 45
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R03EY016790, P30EY014801)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32 NS07492, T32NS007459, T32NS007492, R01NS061348, R01NS059866)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Kruppel-like factors research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
Krüppel-like factors, KLF4, axon regeneration, axon growth, retinal ganglion cells, optic nerve injury, transcriptional repression, central nervous system neurons, developmental gene expression, postnatal gene expression
MeSH terms
Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Animals, Axons, Cell Count, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Nerve Crush, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Neurites, Optic Nerve Injuries, Growth Cones, Mice, Rats, Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors, Gene Knockout Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review