The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Genetic Landscape of a Cell
Open accessAbstract
Making Connections: Genetic interaction profiles highlight cross-connections between bioprocesses, providing a global view of cellular pleiotropy, and enable the prediction of genetic network hubs. Costanzo et al. (p. 425 ) performed a pairwise fitness screen covering approximately one-third of all potential genetic interactions in yeast, examining 5.4 million gene-gene pairs and generating quantitative profiles for ∼75% of the genome. Of the pairwise interactions tested, about 3% of the genes investigated interact under the conditions tested. On the basis of these data, a reference map for the yeast genetic network was created.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Synthetic genetic interaction screens in yeast123,124 have demonstrated that thousands of combinations of individually viable mutations can jointly be lethal, and similar examples have been documented in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans125,126.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [124]
In the citing paper
“Genes belonging to similar biological processes tend to share common genetic interactions, and genes encoding proteins that function together within the same pathway or complex display similar genetic interaction profiles (fig. S4)(1).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Genetic interaction networks highlight mechanistic connections between genes and their corresponding pathways (1).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis automates the combinatorial construction of defined mutants and enables the quantitative analysis of genetic interactions (1, 5).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Negative and positive genetic interactions were quantified and false negative/positive rates and data reproducibility were determined at defined confidence thresholds (1) from analysis of biological replicates and comparison of interactions for a subset of gene pairs represented on both mutant arrays (fig. S2)(8).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Genes belonging to similar biological processes tend to share common genetic interactions, and genes encoding proteins that function together within the same pathway or complex display similar genetic interaction profiles (fig. S4)(1).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Thus, genetic interaction profiles provide a quantitative measurement of functional similarity, and similarity networks generated from the large-scale mapping correlated genetic interaction profiles organizes genes into clusters that highlight biological processes (1).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Thus, genetic interaction profiles provide a quantitative measurement of functional similarity, and similarity networks generated from the large-scale mapping correlated genetic interaction profiles organizes genes into clusters that highlight biological processes (1).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As observed previously (1), fitness defects associated with both deletion alleles of nonessential genes and TS alleles of essential genes were highly correlated with the degree of genetic interaction (figs. S11–S12; Table S1; Data File S10).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous observations (1), positive genetic interactions between nonessential genes also overlapped with protein-protein interactions, albeit to a lesser extent (0.5%, 3.7-fold enrichment; Figs. 5C, S15).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“First, consistent with the results of our previous smaller scale surveys (1, 24), essential genes are major hubs and form the basic scaffold of the global genetic interaction network.”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“One interesting case involves duplicated genes with overlapping function, which often are buffered more extensively, such that more complex triple mutant analysis will be required to reveal their genetic interaction profiles (1, 40).”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with previous findings (1, 5, 28, 29), we found that protein complexes exhibited highly organized patterns of genetic interactions.”
From A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inhibition of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase in Tumors from BRCA Mutation Carriers
Fong, P. C., Boss, D. S., Yap, T. A., Tutt, A., Wu, P., Mergui-Roelvink, M., Mortimer, P., Swaisland, H., Lau, A., O'Connor, M. J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0900212 · Cited by 3,634
Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Krogan, N. J., Cagney, G., Yu, H., Zhong, G., Guo, X., Ignatchenko, A., Li, J., Pu, S., Datta, N., Tikuisis, A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04670 · Cited by 2,964
Self-citationProteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery
Gavin, A., Aloy, P., Grandi, P., Krause, R., Böesche, M., Marzioch, M., Rau, C., Jensen, L. J., Bastuck, S., Dümpelfeld, B., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04532 · Cited by 2,570
Waddington, C. H. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315765471 · Cited by 2,153
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138
Self-citationGlobal Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network
Tong, A. H. Y., Lesage, G., Bader, G. D., Ding, H., Xu, H., Xin, X., Young, J., Berriz, G. F., Brost, R. L., Chang, M., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091317 · Cited by 2,089
Self-citationHigh-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network
Yu, H., Braun, P., Yıldırım, M. A., Lemmens, I., Venkatesan, K., Sahalie, J., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Gebreab, F., Li, N., Simonis, N., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158684 · Cited by 1,392
Self-citationThe Chemical Genomic Portrait of Yeast: Uncovering a Phenotype for All Genes
Hillenmeyer, M. E., Fung, E., Wildenhain, J., Pierce, S. E., Hoon, S. S., Lee, W., Proctor, M. J., St.Onge, R. P., Tyers, M., Koller, D., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1150021 · Cited by 978
Self-citationAn in Vivo Map of the Yeast Protein Interactome
Tarassov, K., Messier, V., Landry, C. R., Radinovic, S., Molina, M. M. S., Shames, I., Malitskaya, Y., Vogel, J., Bussey, H., & Michnick, S. W. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1153878 · Cited by 779
Self-citationComprehensive Characterization of Genes Required for Protein Folding in the Endoplasmic Reticulum
Jonikas, M. C., Collins, S. R., Denic, V., Oh, E., Toyama, E. Q., Schmid, V., Weibezahn, J., Schwappach, B., Walter, P., Weissman, J. S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167983 · Cited by 723
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M., & Lander, E. S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246981 · Cited by 2,856
Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation
Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Adamson, B., Villalta, J. E., Chen, Y., Whitehead, E. H., Guimaraes, C., Panning, B., Ploegh, H. L., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 · Cited by 2,728
Self-citationAntibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era
Brown, E. D., & Wright, G. D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17042 · Cited by 2,315
Interactome Networks and Human Disease
Vidal, M., Cusick, M. E., & Barabási, A.-L. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016 · Cited by 1,771
High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities.
Hart, T., Chandrashekhar, M., Aregger, M., Steinhart, Z., Brown, K. R., MacLeod, G., Mis, M., Zimmermann, M., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Sun, S., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015 · Cited by 1,571
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D., Sevier, C. S., Ding, H., Koh, J. L. Y., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., Prinz, J., St. Onge, R. P., VanderSluis, B., Makhnevych, T., Vizeacoumar, F. J., Alizadeh, S., Bahr, S., Brost, R. L., Chen, Y., Cokol, M., Deshpande, R., Li, Z., Lin, Z.-Y., Liang, W., Marback, M., Paw, J., San Luis, B.-J., Shuteriqi, E., Tong, A. H. Y., van Dyk, N., Wallace, I. M., Whitney, J. A., Weirauch, M. T., Zhong, G., Zhu, H., Houry, W. A., Brudno, M., Ragibizadeh, S., Papp, B., Pál, C., Roth, F. P., Giaever, G., Nislow, C., Troyanskaya, O. G., Bussey, H., Bader, G. D., Gingras, A.-C., Morris, Q. D., Kim, P. M., Kaiser, C. A., Myers, C. L., Andrews, B. J., & Boone, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
- Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, Terrence Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E1, Canada.
- Harvard University (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- S&P Robotics, Inc., 1181 Finch Avenue West, North York, Ontario M3J 2V8, Canada.
- Institute of Biochemistry (HU)
- Princeton University (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Costanzo, Michael
- Baryshnikova, Anastasia
- Myers, Chad L.
- Andrews, Brenda J.
- Boone, Charles
- ORCID
- Costanzo, Michael
- Baryshnikova, Anastasia
- Spear, Eric D.
- Sevier, Carolyn S.
- Mostafavi, Sara
- VanderSluis, Benjamin
- Vizeacoumar, Franco J.
- Chen, Yiqun
- Cokol, Murat
- Li, Zhijian
- Liang, Wendy
- Tong, Amy Hin Yan
- Wallace, Iain M.
- Weirauch, Matthew T.
- Zhu, Hongwei
- Houry, Walid A.
- Brudno, Michael
- Papp, Balázs
- Pál, Csaba
- Roth, Frederick P.
- Giaever, Guri
- Nislow, Corey
- Troyanskaya, Olga G.
- Bader, Gary D.
- Gingras, Anne-Claude
- Morris, Quaid D.
- Kim, Philip M.
- Myers, Chad L.
- Andrews, Brenda J.
- Boone, Charles
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2010-01-22
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 5964
- Pages
- 425-431
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC5600254
- OpenAlex
- W2133102806
- Cited by
- 2,162
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 161 · 2015: 183 · 2014: 203 · 2013: 212 · 2012: 212
- FWCI
- 101.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (084314)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (GSP-415-67)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG003224)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- synthetic genetic interactions, gene-gene interaction, genetic interaction networks, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, gene function annotation, pleiotropy, chemical-genetic interactions, drug target identification
- MeSH terms
- Genes, Fungal, Mutation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Genome, Fungal, Computational Biology, Gene Duplication, Protein Interaction Mapping, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Gene Regulatory Networks, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Genetic Fitness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
