Cited by 1,000Polymer Surface Interaction StudiesCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry

Iron-Clad Fibers: A Metal-Based Biological Strategy for Hard Flexible Coatings

Open access
Harrington, Matthew J., Masic, Admir, Holten-Andersen, Niels, Waite, J. Herbert, Fratzl, Peter·2010·Science

Abstract

The extensible byssal threads of marine mussels are shielded from abrasion in wave-swept habitats by an outer cuticle that is largely proteinaceous and approximately fivefold harder than the thread core. Threads from several species exhibit granular cuticles containing a protein that is rich in the catecholic amino acid 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (dopa) as well as inorganic ions, notably Fe3+. Granular cuticles exhibit a remarkable combination of high hardness and high extensibility. We explored byssus cuticle chemistry by means of in situ resonance Raman spectroscopy and demonstrated that the cuticle is a polymeric scaffold stabilized by catecholato-iron chelate complexes having an unusual clustered distribution. Consistent with byssal cuticle chemistry and mechanics, we present a model in which dense cross-linking in the granules provides hardness, whereas the less cross-linked matrix provides extensibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1181044

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coordination bonding and strong chelating bonding with transition metal compounds occur between catechol or diketone groups on the polydopamine coating layer and the interface of inorganic biosubstitutes, along with protein cross-linking.

    “Such coordination bonding and strong chelating bonding with transition metal compound occur between catechol or diketone groups on the PDA coating layer and the interface of inorganic biosubstitutes along with the protein cross-linking [61–66].”

    From Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification for Bone Biosubstitutes (2016) · cites this paper as [62]

    The indexed passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) describes catechol–iron coordination and cross-links between mussel foot protein chains, supporting the general bonding mechanism. It does not establish that such bonds occur at an inorganic biosubstitute interface on a polydopamine (PDA) coating, or that diketone groups participate. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • On certain specific inorganic biosubstitute surfaces, such as negatively charged oxidized silicone, electrostatic interaction from protonated amino groups can enhance adhesion of biomolecules to the surface.

    “Meanwhile, on certain specific surfaces of inorganic biosubstitutes (e.g., negatively charged oxidized silicone), the electrostatic interaction from protonated amino group can also enhance the adhesion of biomolecules to the surface of biosubstitutes [62, 67].”

    From Polydopamine-Assisted Surface Modification for Bone Biosubstitutes (2016) · cites this paper as [62]

    The paper’s discussion of mussel byssus cuticles describes dopa–metal cross-links and their mechanical role (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable). Searches for protonated amino groups, electrostatic surface adhesion, and oxidized silicone found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Broomell CC Mattoni MA Zok FW Waite JH J. Exp. Biol 2006 209 3219 16888069 PMC1865513
  2. [2]Werneke SW Swann C Farquharson LA Hamilton KS Smith AM J. Exp. Biol 2007 210 2137 17562887
  3. [3]Harrington MJ Waite JH Biomacromolecules 2008 9 1480 18402475
  4. [4]Harrington MJ Gupta HS Fratzl P Waite JH J. Struct. Biol 2009 167 47 19275941 PMC2692767
  5. [5]Lee SM Science 2009 324 488 19390040
  6. [6]Pires MM Chmielewski J J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009 131 2706 19182901
  7. [7]Lee H Scherer NF Messersmith PB Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2006 103 12999 16920796 PMC1559742
  8. [8]Zhang ZS Jordan RB Inorg. Chem 1996 35 1571 11666375
  9. [9]Schmitt L Ludwig M Gaub HE Tampé R Biophys. J 2000 78 3275 10828003 PMC1300908
  10. [10]Sever MJ Weisser JT Monahan J Srinivasan S Wilker JJ Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2004 43 448 14735531
  11. [11]Lichtenegger HC Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2003 100 9144 12886017 PMC170886
  12. [12]Vaccaro E Waite JH Biomacromolecules 2001 2 906 11710048
  13. [13]Holten-Andersen N Langmuir 2009 25 3323 18847291 PMC2746015
  14. [15]Vitarello Zuccarello L Tissue Cell 1981 13 701 6800062
  15. [16]Holten-Andersen N Fantner GE Hohlbauch S Waite JH Zok FW Nat. Mater 2007 6 669 17618290
  16. [17]Holten-Andersen N Zhao H Waite JH Biochemistry 2009 48 2752 19220048 PMC2736323
  17. [18]Sun CJ Waite JH J. Biol. Chem 2005 280 39332 16166079
  18. [19]Benedict CV Waite JH J. Morphol 1986 189 171 3018262
  19. [20]Haemers S van der Leeden MC Frens G Biomaterials 2005 26 1231 15475052
  20. [21]Waite JH Housley TJ Tanzer ML Biochemistry 1985 24 5010 4074674
  21. [26]Michaud-Soret I Andersson KK Que L Jr Haavik J Biochemistry 1995 34 5504 7727409
  22. [28]Li HB Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2001 98 10682

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrington, M. J., Masic, A., Holten-Andersen, N., Waite, J. H., & Fratzl, P.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE)
  • Department of Biomaterials, Max Planck Institute for Colloids and Interfaces, Potsdam 14424, Germany.
  • Biomolecular Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Harrington, Matthew J.
Venue
Science
Published
2010-04-09
Volume
328
Issue
5975
Pages
216-220
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2011556452
Cited by
1,000
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 49
FWCI
20.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE018468, R01DE015415)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Keywords
byssal threads, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, crosslinking, bioinspired coatings, Mytilidae
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Structures, Biomechanical Phenomena, Dihydroxyphenylalanine, Ferric Compounds, Hardness, Iron, Models, Biological, Proteins, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Repetitive Sequences, Amino Acid, Mytilus, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review