Cited by 27Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Prion-Like Behavior of Amyloid-β

Kim, Jungsu, Holtzman, David M.·2010·Science

Abstract

Can Alzheimer's disease arise through pathogenic transmission of a protein aggregate?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1198314

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kim, J., & Holtzman, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2010-11-12
Volume
330
Issue
6006
Pages
918-919
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2036564106
Cited by
27
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyloid-beta, prion-like behavior, Alzheimer's disease, protein aggregation, protein misfolding
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloidosis, Animals, Brain, Prions, Protein Conformation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Protein Folding, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review