Cited by 328Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationPhilosophy and History of Science

Second-Order Selection for Evolvability in a Large Escherichia coli Population

Open access
Woods, Robert J., Barrick, Jeffrey E., Cooper, Tim F., Shrestha, Utpala, Kauth, Mark R., Lenski, Richard E.·2011·Science

Abstract

Descendants of bacterial lineages that retained adaptation potential outcompeted competitors of higher fitness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1198914

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With suitable neutral genetic markers, fitness differences can be easily monitored during laboratory evolution of microbial cells.

    “With suitable neutral genetic markers, this fitness difference can be easily monitored during laboratory evolution of microbial cells [34,59].”
  • The long-term E. coli adaptation experiment by Lenski's group has exceeded 50000 generations.

    “This single parallel E. coli adaptation experiment is already exceeding 50000 generations [33-35].”
  • During the first few thousand generations, glucose-evolved E. coli cultures developed larger cell size and a lower final cell density as compared with the ancestor.

    “During the first few thousand generations, glucose-evolved cultures developed larger cell size and a lower final cell density as compared with the ancestor [34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woods, R. J., Barrick, J. E., Cooper, T. F., Shrestha, U., Kauth, M. R., & Lenski, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
  • Woods, Robert J.
  • Barrick, Jeffrey E.
  • Lenski, Richard E.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-03-18
Volume
331
Issue
6023
Pages
1433-1436
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2123832578
Cited by
328
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 39
FWCI
30.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-09-1-0055)
  • National Institutes of Health (K99GM087550)
  • National Science Foundation (DEB1019989)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
evolvability, Escherichia coli, long-term evolution experiment, asexual lineages, competitive fitness, beneficial mutations, genetic interactions, regulatory mutations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Epistasis, Genetic, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Genes, Bacterial, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Fitness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review