Cited by 1,111Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsHydrology and Drought AnalysisFire effects on ecosystems

The 2010 Amazon drought.

Lewis, Simon L., Brando, Paulo M., Phillips, Oliver L., van der Heijden, Geertje M. F., Nepstad, Daniel·2011·Science

Abstract

In 2010, dry-season rainfall was low across Amazonia, with apparent similarities to the major 2005 drought. We analyzed a decade of satellite-derived rainfall data to compare both events. Standardized anomalies of dry-season rainfall showed that 57% of Amazonia had low rainfall in 2010 as compared with 37% in 2005 (≤-1 standard deviation from long-term mean). By using relationships between drying and forest biomass responses measured for 2005, we predict the impact of the 2010 drought as 2.2 × 10(15) grams of carbon [95% confidence intervals (CIs) are 1.2 and 3.4], largely longer-term committed emissions from drought-induced tree deaths, compared with 1.6 × 10(15) grams of carbon (CIs 0.8 and 2.6) for the 2005 event.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1200807

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two record droughts of 2005 and 2010 were regarded as once-in-a-century climate extremes at the times of their occurrences and were linked to anomalous SSTs in the tropical Atlantic.

    “The two record droughts of 2005 and 2010 were regarded as “once in a century” climate extremes at the times of their occurrences and were linked to anomalous SSTs in the tropical Atlantic (Figure 1; Marengo et al., 2008;Zeng et al., 2008;Lewis et al., 2011).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Lewis et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., van der Heijden, G. M. F., & Nepstad, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
  • Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Lewis, Simon L.
  • Brando, Paulo M.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-02-04
Volume
331
Issue
6017
Pages
554-554
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2011560911
Cited by
1,111
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 72
FWCI
78.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/I02982X/1, NE/D01025X/1, NE/B504630/1, NE/D010306/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
Keywords
dry season rainfall, rainfall anomalies, drought-induced tree mortality, CO2 emissions, forest biomass, satellite rainfall data
MeSH terms
Brazil, Carbon, Seasons, South America, Trees, Ecosystem, Biomass, Droughts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review