Cited by 442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heralded Entanglement Between Widely Separated Atoms

Hofmann, Julian, Krug, Michael, Ortegel, Norbert, Gérard, Lea, Weber, Markus, Rosenfeld, Wenjamin, Weinfurter, Harald·2012·Science

Abstract

Entanglement On Cue: Quantum entanglement between particles lies at the core of quantum mechanics. For practical applications such as long-distance quantum communications, cryptography, and quantum networks, entanglement must be heralded. That is, a signal flags the existence of the entangled state so that it can be manipulated and transferred. Hofmann et al. (p. 72 ; see the Perspective by Volz and Rauschenbeutel ) excited trapped single atoms in different laboratory rooms 20 meters apart and were able to show that manipulation, interference, and detection of the photons from the excited atoms could signal when the atoms are entangled. The extent of the observed entanglement may be sufficient to start to probe fundamental questions relating to the entanglement process and thus address the foundations of quantum mechanics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1221856

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The frequency difference ∆ω between photons from different-frequency pairs generates a phase exp(i∆ω∆t) between the components, which will render the state mixed if unaccounted for because the detection time difference ∆t is random.

    “The frequency difference ∆ω generates a phase of exp(i∆ω∆t) between the components, which will render the state mixed if unaccounted for because the detection time difference ∆t is random.”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [112]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4293 · DOI
  2. 10.1088/0034-4885/41/12/002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.110405 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1166/asl.2009.1059 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/35096524 · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.030405 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1140300 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nature07241 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nature06118 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.1211914 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.150501 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.213002 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nature09997 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022343 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.253001 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.010502 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.010503 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.260403 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.030404 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.043406 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.023005 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.213001 · DOI
  23. 10.1209/0295-5075/25/8/001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.R1727 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1134/S0030400X11110233 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hofmann, J., Krug, M., Ortegel, N., Gérard, L., Weber, M., Rosenfeld, W., & Weinfurter, H.
Affiliations
Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, D-80799 München, Germany.
Venue
Science
Published
2012-07-06
Volume
337
Issue
6090
Pages
72-75
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
442
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review