Cited by 848Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Demonstration of a Neutral Atom Controlled-NOT Quantum Gate

Open access
Isenhower, L., Urban, E., Zhang, X. L., Gill, A. T., Henage, T., Johnson, T. A., Walker, T. G., Saffman, M.·2010·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We present the first demonstration of a CNOT gate between two individually addressed neutral atoms. Our implementation of the CNOT uses Rydberg blockade interactions between neutral atoms held in optical traps separated by >8 microm. Using two different gate protocols we measure CNOT fidelities of F=0.73 and 0.72 based on truth table probabilities. The gate was used to generate Bell states with fidelity F=0.48+/-0.06. After correcting for atom loss we obtain an a posteriori entanglement fidelity of F=0.58.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.104.010503

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The necessary interaction for two-qubit gates in neutral atom quantum computers is realised by exciting atoms to Rydberg states.

    “The necessary interaction is realised by exciting atoms to states with very high energy, called Rydberg states [34][35][36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isenhower, L., Urban, E., Zhang, X. L., Gill, A. T., Henage, T., Johnson, T. A., Walker, T. G., & Saffman, M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
104
Issue
1
Pages
010503-010503
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2134477962
Cited by
848
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 65
FWCI
37.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
CNOT gate, neutral atoms, Rydberg blockade, optical tweezers, quantum gates, Bell states, entanglement fidelity, gate fidelity, atom loss, quantum computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review