Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,134

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlled Flight of a Biologically Inspired, Insect-Scale Robot

Ma, Kevin Y., Chirarattananon, Pakpong, Fuller, Sawyer B., Wood, Robert J.·2013·Science

Abstract

Lord of the Robotic Flies: While small-scale flying objects are ubiquitous in nature, they are quite hard to engineer. As sizes get smaller, fixed-winged flight becomes less efficient because of increased drag resistance.Ma et al.(p.603) developed a tethered robotic fly with wings that flap through the use of piezo-electric materials. Control of the flight motion involved a feedback process, which allowed the tethered robotic fly to hover and make controlled flight maneuvers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1231806

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,134

Metadata

Authors
Ma, K. Y., Chirarattananon, P., Fuller, S. B., & Wood, R. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-05-03
Volume
340
Issue
6132
Pages
603-607
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2035155402
Cited by
1,134
References
1
FWCI
121.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlled Flight of a Biologically Inspired, Insect-Scale Robot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1231806
The paper
Ma, K. Y., Chirarattananon, P., Fuller, S. B., & Wood, R. J. (2013). Controlled Flight of a Biologically Inspired, Insect-Scale Robot. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231806

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.