Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deciphering the Glycosylome of Dystroglycanopathies Using Haploid Screens for Lassa Virus Entry

Jae, Lucas T., Raaben, Matthijs, Riemersma, Moniek, van Beusekom, Ellen, Blomen, Vincent A., Velds, Arno, Kerkhoven, Ron. M., Carette, Jan E., Topaloglu, Haluk, Meinecke, Peter, Wessels, Marja W., Lefeber, Dirk J., Whelan, Sean P., van Bokhoven, Hans, Brummelkamp, Thijn R.·2013·Science

Abstract

Viruses and Congenital Disorders: Mutations in genes involved in α-dystroglycan O-linked glycosylation result in posttranslation modifications associated with the congenital disease Walker-Warburg syndrome (WWS). This cellular modification is also required for efficient Lassa virus infection of cells. Jae et al. (p. 479 , published online 21 March) screened for genes involved in O-glycosylation that affected Lassa virus infection and identified candidates involved in glycosylation. Individuals from different pedigrees exhibiting WWS had unique mutations among genes identified in the genetic screen. Thus, comprehensive forward genetic screens can be used to define the genetic architecture of a complex disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1233675

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strongest negative regulator of SQLE-mNeon found in the screen was the E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6 and its cognate E2 partner UBE2J2.

    “Conversely, the strongest negative regulator of SQLE-mNeon found in our screen was the E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6, and its cognate E2 partner UBE2J2, which we have recently reported to be critical determinants of cholesterol-dependent degradation of SQLE25–27.”

    From Haploid genetic screens identify SPRING/C12ORF49 as a determinant of SREBP signaling and cholesterol metabolism (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

    The paper’s main-text account of its haploid screen identifies factors involved in Lassa virus entry and dystroglycan glycosylation, not regulators of SQLE-mNeon. Searches for MARCH6, UBE2J2, SQLE-mNeon, and cholesterol-dependent SQLE degradation found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1126/science.1180512 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.gde.2011.02.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature00837 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.282.5396.2076 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.282.5396.2079 · DOI
  6. 10.1128/JVI.79.22.14282-14296.2005 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.07.009 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/ng.2253 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/ng.2252 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1178955 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature10348 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nbt.1857 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.06.006 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/hmg/ddt021 · DOI
  15. 10.1042/BJ20050375 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)16011-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7572 · DOI
  18. R. J. L. Hari G. Garg Charles A. Hales Chemistry and Biology of Heparin and Heparan Sulfate (Elsevier Kidlington Oxford UK 2005).
  19. 10.1126/science.1214115 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.002 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nprot.2011.431 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0300985811415708 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.009 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8388 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/JVI.01832-09 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002427 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006193 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature03681 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jae, L. T., Raaben, M., Riemersma, M., van Beusekom, E., Blomen, V. A., Velds, A., Kerkhoven, R. M., Carette, J. E., Topaloglu, H., Meinecke, P., Wessels, M. W., Lefeber, D. J., Whelan, S. P., van Bokhoven, H., & Brummelkamp, T. R.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-04-26
Volume
340
Issue
6131
Pages
479-483
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
272
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review