Cited by 1,266Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsMicro and Nano Robotics

Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm

Rubenstein, Michael, Cornejo, Alejandro, Nagpal, Radhika·2014·Science

Abstract

Large-scale robotic self-assembly: When individuals swarm, they must somehow communicate to direct collective motion. Swarms of robots need to deal with outliers, such as robots that move more slowly than the rest. Rubenstein et al. created a large swarm of programmed robots that can form collaborations using only local information. The robots could communicate only with nearby members, within about three times their diameter. They were able to assemble into complex preprogrammed shapes. If the robots' formation hit snags when they bumped into one another or because of an outlier, additional algorithms guided them to rectify their collective movements. Science , this issue p. 795

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1254295

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. S. Camazine et al . Self-Organization in Biological Systems (Princeton Univ. Press Princeton NJ 2003).
  2. M. Kirschner J. Gerhart The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma (Yale Univ. Press New Haven CT 2005).
  3. E. William G Mermoud A. Martinoli in Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Anchorage AK May 2010) pp. 1438–1445.
  4. M. Rubenstein C. Ahler R. Nagpal in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (St. Paul MN May 2012) pp. 3293–3298.
  5. P. Vartholomeos E. Papadopoulos in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Orlando FL May 2006) pp. 649–654.
  6. D. Moore J. Leonard D. Rus S. Teller in The 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Baltimore November 2004) pp. 50–61.
  7. J. Werfel Y. Bar-Yam D. Rus R. Nagpal in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Orlando FL May 2006) pp. 2787–2794.
  8. M. De Rosa S. Goldstein P. Lee J. Campbell P. Pillai in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Orlando FL May 2006) pp. 1462–1468.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., & Nagpal, R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rubenstein, Michael
Venue
Science
Published
2014-08-15
Volume
345
Issue
6198
Pages
795-799
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2030775133
Cited by
1,266
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 11
FWCI
94.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Micro and Nano Robotics
Keywords
programmable self-assembly, swarm robotics, shape formation, decentralized systems, autonomous robots, local interactions, artificial swarms, two-dimensional shapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review