Human Interaction With Robot Swarms: A Survey
Abstract
Recent advances in technology are delivering robots of reduced size and cost. A natural outgrowth of these advances are systems comprised of large numbers of robots that collaborate autonomously in diverse applications. Research on effective autonomous control of such systems, commonly called swarms, has increased dramatically in recent years and received attention from many domains, such as bioinspired robotics and control theory. These kinds of distributed systems present novel challenges for the effective integration of human supervisors, operators, and teammates that are only beginning to be addressed. This paper is the first survey of human-swarm interaction (HSI) and identifies the core concepts needed to design a human-swarm system. We first present the basics of swarm robotics. Then, we introduce HSI from the perspective of a human operator by discussing the cognitive complexity of solving tasks with swarm systems. Next, we introduce the interface between swarm and operator and identify challenges and solutions relating to human-swarm communication, state estimation and visualization, and human control of swarms. For the latter, we develop a taxonomy of control methods that enable operators to control swarms effectively. Finally, we synthesize the results to highlight remaining challenges, unanswered questions, and open problems for HSI, as well as how to address them in future works.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disruption in the working of the swarm might be caused by just a few malicious robots sneaking into the group.
“In addition, disruption in the working of the swarm might be caused by just a few malicious robots sneaking into the group [97].”
From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
Security issues are more serious in the case of robot swarms.
“Such issues will be even more serious in the case of robot swarms [97].”
From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [97]
Cites
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339 · see citing works
Self-Organization in Biological Systems
Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Franks, N. R. (2001) · doi:10.1515/9780691212920 · Cited by 2,949 · see citing works
Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm
Rubenstein, M., Cornejo, A., & Nagpal, R. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254295 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View]
Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., & Trianni, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3072740 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Automatic Design of Collective Behaviors for Robots that Can Display and Perceive Colors
Garzón Ramos, D., & Birattari, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10134654 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Mondada, L., Karim, M. E., & Mondada, F. (2016) · Swarm Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s11721-016-0127-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Podevijn, G., O’Grady, R., Fantini-Hauwel, C., & Dorigo, M. (2018) · Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73008-0_37 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kolling, A., Walker, P., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K., & Lewis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-26
- ISSN
- 2168-2291 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2305
- OpenAlex
- W2267863633
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 32.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-09-1-0680)
- European Research Council (PCIG14-GA-2013-631553)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- human-swarm interaction, swarm robotics, human operators, human-machine interaction, state estimation, visualization, cognitive complexity, bio-inspired robotics, autonomous decentralized systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review