Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 650

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics

Open access
Fontaine, Michael C., Pease, James B., Steele, Aaron, Waterhouse, Robert M., Neafsey, Daniel E., Sharakhov, Igor V., Jiang, Xiaofang, Hall, Andrew B., Catteruccia, Flaminia, Kakani, Evdoxia, Mitchell, Sara N., Wu, Yi-Chieh, Smith, Hilary A., Love, R. Rebecca, Lawniczak, Mara K., Slotman, Michel A., Emrich, Scott J., Hahn, Matthew W., Besansky, Nora J.·2015·Science

Abstract

Introduction: The notion that species boundaries can be porous to introgression is increasingly accepted. Yet the broader role of introgression in evolution remains contentious and poorly documented, partly because of the challenges involved in accurately identifying introgression in the very groups where it is most likely to occur. Recently diverged species often have incomplete reproductive barriers and may hybridize where they overlap. However, because of retention and stochastic sorting of ancestral polymorphisms, inference of the correct species branching order is notoriously challenging for recent speciation events, especially those closely spaced in time. Without knowledge of species relationships, it is impossible to identify instances of introgression. Rationale: Since the discovery that the single mosquito taxon described in 1902 as Anopheles gambiae was actually a complex of several closely related and morphologically indistinguishable sibling species, the correct species branching order has remained controversial and unresolved. This Afrotropical complex contains the world’s most important vectors of human malaria, owing to their close association with humans, as well as minor vectors and species that do not bite humans. On the basis of ecology and behavior, one might predict phylogenetic clustering of the three highly anthropophilic vector species. However, previous phylogenetic analyses of the complex based on a limited number of markers strongly disagree about relationships between the major vectors, potentially because of historical introgression between them. To investigate the history of the species complex, we used whole-genome reference assemblies, as well as dozens of resequenced individuals from the field. Results: We observed a large amount of phylogenetic discordance between trees generated from the autosomes and X chromosome. The autosomes, which make up the majority of the genome, overwhelmingly supported the grouping of the three major vectors of malaria, An. gambiae , An. coluzzii , and An. arabiensis . In stark contrast, the X chromosome strongly supported the grouping of An. arabiensis with a species that plays no role in malaria transmission, An. quadriannulatus . Although the whole-genome consensus phylogeny unequivocally agrees with the autosomal topology, we found that the topology most often located on the X chromosome follows the historical species branching order, with pervasive introgression on the autosomes producing relationships that group the three highly anthropophilic species together. With knowledge of the correct species branching order, we are further able to uncover introgression between another species pair, as well as a complex history of balancing selection, introgression, and local adaptation of a large autosomal inversion that confers aridity tolerance. Conclusion: We identify the correct species branching order of the An. gambiae species complex, resolving a contentious phylogeny. Notably, lineages leading to the principal vectors of human malaria were among the first in the complex to radiate and are not most closely related to each other. Pervasive autosomal introgression between these human malaria vectors, including nonsister vector species, suggests that traits enhancing vectorial capacity can be acquired not only through de novo mutation but also through a more rapid process of interspecific genetic exchange. Time-lapse photographs of an adult anopheline mosquito emerging from its pupal case. RELATED ITEMS IN Science D. E. Neafsey et al ., Science 347 , 1258522 (2015)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1258524

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 650

Metadata

Authors
Fontaine, M. C., Pease, J. B., Steele, A., Waterhouse, R. M., Neafsey, D. E., Sharakhov, I. V., Jiang, X., Hall, A. B., Catteruccia, F., Kakani, E., Mitchell, S. N., Wu, Y.-C., Smith, H. A., Love, R. R., Lawniczak, M. K., Slotman, M. A., Emrich, S. J., Hahn, M. W., & Besansky, N. J.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
347
Issue
6217
Pages
1258524-1258524
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2131400772
Cited by
650
References
16
FWCI
48.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1258524
The paper
Fontaine, M. C., Pease, J. B., Steele, A., Waterhouse, R. M., Neafsey, D. E., Sharakhov, I. V., Jiang, X., Hall, A. B., Catteruccia, F., Kakani, E., Mitchell, S. N., Wu, Y.-C., Smith, H. A., Love, R. R., Lawniczak, M. K., Slotman, M. A., Emrich, S. J., Hahn, M. W., & Besansky, N. J. (2015). Extensive introgression in a malaria vector species complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258524

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.