CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 883

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Control of EGF Receptor Signaling by Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis

Vieira, Amandio V., Lamaze, Christophe, Schmid, Sandra L.·1996·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.274.5295.2086
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling was analyzed in mammalian cells conditionally defective for receptor-mediated endocytosis. EGF-dependent cell proliferation was enhanced in endocytosis-defective cells. However, early EGF-dependent signaling events were not uniformly up-regulated. A subset of signal transducers required the normal endocytic trafficking of EGFR for full activation. Thus, endocytic trafficking of activated EGFR plays a critical role not only in attenuating EGFR signaling but also in establishing and controlling specific signaling pathways.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.274.5295.2086

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model suggests a role for Dab2 in mediating the endocytosis of signaling complexes and regulating signaling at the endosomes.

    “The model suggests a role for Dab2 in mediating the endocytosis of signaling complexes and regulating signaling at the endosomes”

    From Endocytosis and Physiology: Insights from Disabled-2 Deficient Mice (2016) · cites this paper as Vieira et al., 1996

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Haigler H. T., McKanna J. M., Cohen S., J. Cell Biol. 81, 382 (1979). · DOI
  2. Sorkin A., Waters C. M., Bioessays 15, 375 (1993). · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.8342026 · DOI
  4. Benmerak A., et al., J. Cell Biol. 131, 1831 (1995); · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.272.5270.1935 · DOI
  6. Lamaze C., Baba T., Redelmeier T. E., Schmid S. L., Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 715 (1993); · DOI
  7. 10.1083/jcb.129.1.47 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.272.5264.1008 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Joly M., Kazlauskas A., Fay R. S., Corvera S., ibid. 263, 684 (1994);
  10. Schpetner H., Joly M., Hartley D., Corvera S., J. Cell Biol. 132, 595 (1996). · DOI
  11. 10.1083/jcb.127.4.915 · DOI
  12. Liu J.-P., Robinson P. J., Endocr. Rev. 16, 590 (1995);
  13. Warnock D. E., Schmid S. L., Bioessays 18, 885 (1996). · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)99131-3 · DOI
  15. DiGuglielmo G. M., Baass P. C., Ou W.-J., Posner B. I., Bergeron J. J. M., EMBO J. 13, 4269 (1994). · DOI
  16. Soltoff S. P., Cantley L. C., J. Biol. Chem. 271, 563 (1996). · DOI
  17. Baas P. C., DiGuglielmo G. M., Authier F., Posner B. I., Bergeron J. J. M., Trends Cell Biol. 5, 465 (1995). · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.271.5255.1533 · DOI
  19. Lamaze C., Chuang T.-H., Terlecky L. J., Bokoch G. M., Schmid S. L., Nature 382, 177 (1996). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vieira, A. V., Lamaze, C., & Schmid, S. L.
Affiliations
Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
1996-12-20
Volume
274
Issue
5295
Pages
2086-2089
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.274.5295.2086
Cited by
883
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review