Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increase of Maximum Life-Span in Sweden, 1861-1999

Wilmoth, J. R., Deegan, L. J., Lundström, H., Horiuchi, S.·2000·Science

Abstract

A fundamental question in aging research is whether humans and other species possess an immutable life-span limit. We examined the maximum age at death in Sweden, which rose from about 101 years during the 1860s to about 108 years during the 1990s. The pace of increase was 0.44 years per decade before 1969 but accelerated to 1.11 years per decade after that date. More than 70 percent of the rise in the maximum age at death from 1861 to 1999 is attributable to reductions in death rates above age 70. The rest are due to increased numbers of survivors to old age (both larger birth cohorts and increased survivorship from infancy to age 70). The more rapid rise in the maximum age since 1969 is due to the faster pace of old-age mortality decline during recent decades.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.289.5488.2366

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Sweden, the maximum reported age at death rose from about 101 years during the 1860s to about 108 years during the 1990s.

    “In Sweden, based on a long series of reliable information on the upper limits of human lifespan, the maximum reported age at death was found to have risen from about 101 years during the 1860s to about 108 years during the 1990s6.”

    From Evidence for a limit to human lifespan (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. J.-M. Robine and M. Allard in Validation of Exceptional Longevity B. Jeune and J. W. Vaupel Eds. (Odense Univ. Press Odense Denmark 1999) pp.145–172.
  2. Wilmoth J. R., Lundström H., Eur. J. Popul. 12, 63 (1996). · DOI
  3. Hill M., Preston S. H., Rosenwaike I., Demography 37, 175 (2000). · DOI
  4. A. R. Thatcher V. Kannisto J. W. Vaupel The Force of Mortality at Ages 80 to 120 (Odense Univ. Press Odense Denmark 1998).
  5. 10.2307/2137662 · DOI
  6. Horiuchi S., Popul. Bull. U.N. 31/32, 38 (1991).
  7. J. W. Vaupel and B. Jeune in Exceptional Longevity: From Prehistory to the Present B. Jeune and J. W. Vaupel Eds. (Odense Univ. Press Odense Denmark 1995) pp. 109–116.
  8. L. Hayflick How and Why We Age (Ballantine New York 1996) pp. 66–67 and 93–94.
  9. L. A. Gavrilov and N. S. Gavrilova The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach (Harwood Chur Switzerland 1991). See chapter 4 for a critical review.
  10. Wilmoth J. R., Science 280, 295 (1998). · DOI
  11. Manton K. G., Stallard E., J. Gerontol.: Biol. Sci. 51A, B362 (1996). · DOI
  12. ___ Statistics of Extremes (Columbia Univ. Press New York 1958).
  13. 10.1126/science.280.5365.855 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Yashin A. I., Vaupel J. W., Iachine I. A., Mech. Ageing Dev. 74, 1 (1994). · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2530689 · DOI
  16. Wilmoth J. R., Horiuchi S., Demography 36, 475 (1999). · DOI
  17. Finch C. E., Pike M. C., J. Gerontol.: Biol. Sci. 51A, B183 (1996). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilmoth, J. R., Deegan, L. J., Lundström, H., & Horiuchi, S.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-09-29
Volume
289
Issue
5488
Pages
2366-2368
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
173
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review