The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Stroop Effect: Brain Potentials Localize the Source of Interference
Abstract
The P300 component of the event-related brain potential was used in conjunction with reaction time to identify the locus of interference on the Stroop color-word test. Whereas response time varied with the congruence between the stimulus word and the color in which it was printed, the duration of stimulus processing, as indexed by P300 latency, remained constant. The results indicate that response competition is the primary source of Stroop interference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
On the speed of mental processes
Donders, F. C. (1969) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1 · Cited by 1,784
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Cited by
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x · Cited by 2,567
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766
Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045 · Cited by 1,191
Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach
Mirsky, A. F., Anthony, B. J., Duncan, C. C., Ahearn, M. B., & Kellam, S. G. (1991) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01109051 · Cited by 874
Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential
Patel, S. H., & Azzam, P. N. (2005) · International Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijms.2.147 · Cited by 794
MacLeod, C. M., & MacDonald, P. A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01530-8 · Cited by 694
On the Dependence of P300 Latency on Stimulus Evaluation Processes
Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1984) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb00201.x · Cited by 614
The Electrophysiological Dynamics of Interference during the Stroop Task
Hanslmayr, S., Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.-H., Gruber, S., Wimber, M., & Klimesch, W. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20020 · Cited by 510
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · Cited by 5,500
Coherence and Specificity of Information-Processing Biases in Depression and Social Phobia.
Gotlib, I. H., Kasch, K. L., Traill, S., Joormann, J., Arnow, B. A., & Johnson, S. L. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.3.386 · Cited by 396
Young Psychophysiologist Award Address, 1980: P300 Latency: A New Metric of Information Processing
Duncan‐Johnson, C. C. (1981) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03020.x · Cited by 371
Self-citationDriven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects.
Melara, R. D., & Algom, D. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.422 · Cited by 342
Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task
West, R., & Alain, C. (1999) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00017-8 · Cited by 271
Event-related potentials during an emotional Stroop task
Thomas, S. J., Johnstone, S. J., & Gonsalvez, C. J. (2007) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.10.002 · Cited by 190
Badzakova-Trajkov, G., Barnett, K. J., Waldie, K. E., & Kirk, I. J. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.069 · Cited by 121
Szűcs, D., & Soltész, F. (2012) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-35 · Cited by 73
Psychophysiological Methods for the Study of Developmental Psychopathology
Fox, N. A., Ashley Hane, A., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. (2015) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9780470939390.ch9 · Cited by 16
Tavakoli, P., Jerome, E., Boafo, A., & Campbell, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.694147 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Kopell, B. S.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1981-11-20
- Volume
- 214
- Issue
- 4523
- Pages
- 938-940
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1992887689
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
