Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 839

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication

Open access
Avni, Raz, Nave, Moran, Barad, Omer, Baruch, Kobi, Twardziok, Sven O., Gundlach, Heidrun, Hale, Iago, Mascher, Martin, Spannagl, Manuel, Wiebe, Krystalee, Jordan, Katherine W., Golan, Guy, Deek, Jasline, Ben-Zvi, Batsheva, Ben-Zvi, Gil, Himmelbach, Axel, MacLachlan, Ron P., Sharpe, Andrew G., Fritz, Allan, Ben-David, Roi, Budak, Hikmet, Fahima, Tzion, Korol, Abraham, Faris, Justin D., Hernandez, Alvaro, Mikel, Mark A., Levy, Avraham A., Steffenson, Brian, Maccaferri, Marco, Tuberosa, Roberto, Cattivelli, Luigi, Faccioli, Primetta, Ceriotti, Aldo, Kashkush, Khalil, Pourkheirandish, Mohammad, Komatsuda, Takao, Eilam, Tamar, Sela, Hanan, Sharon, Amir, Ohad, Nir, Chamovitz, Daniel A., Mayer, Klaus F.X., Stein, Nils, Ronen, Gil, Peleg, Zvi, Pozniak, Curtis J., Akhunov, Eduard D., Distelfeld, Assaf·2017·Science

Abstract

Genomics and domestication of wheat: Modern wheat, which underlies the diet of many across the globe, has a long history of selection and crosses among different species. Avni et al. used the Hi-C method of genome confirmation capture to assemble and annotate the wild allotetraploid wheat ( Triticum turgidum ). They then identified the putative causal mutations in genes controlling shattering (a key domestication trait among cereal crops). They also performed an exome capture–based analysis of domestication among wild and domesticated genotypes of emmer wheat. The findings present a compelling overview of the emmer wheat genome and its usefulness in an agricultural context for understanding traits in modern bread wheat. Science , this issue p. 93

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aan0032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 839

Metadata

Authors
Avni, R., Nave, M., Barad, O., Baruch, K., Twardziok, S. O., Gundlach, H., Hale, I., Mascher, M., Spannagl, M., Wiebe, K., Jordan, K. W., Golan, G., Deek, J., Ben-Zvi, B., Ben-Zvi, G., Himmelbach, A., MacLachlan, R. P., Sharpe, A. G., Fritz, A., Ben-David, R., Budak, H., Fahima, T., Korol, A., Faris, J. D., Hernandez, A., Mikel, M. A., Levy, A. A., Steffenson, B., Maccaferri, M., Tuberosa, R., Cattivelli, L., Faccioli, P., Ceriotti, A., Kashkush, K., Pourkheirandish, M., Komatsuda, T., Eilam, T., Sela, H., Sharon, A., Ohad, N., Chamovitz, D. A., Mayer, K. F. X., Stein, N., Ronen, G., Peleg, Z., Pozniak, C. J., Akhunov, E. D., & Distelfeld, A.
Venue
Science
Published
2017-07-07
Volume
357
Issue
6346
Pages
93-97
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2726347871
Cited by
839
References
5
FWCI
88.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aan0032
The paper
Avni, R., Nave, M., Barad, O., Baruch, K., Twardziok, S. O., Gundlach, H., Hale, I., Mascher, M., Spannagl, M., Wiebe, K., Jordan, K. W., Golan, G., Deek, J., Ben-Zvi, B., Ben-Zvi, G., Himmelbach, A., MacLachlan, R. P., Sharpe, A. G., Fritz, A., . . . Distelfeld, A. (2017). Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.