The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As the world continues to transition toward carbon emissions–free energy technologies, there remains a need to also reduce the carbon emissions of the chemical production industry. Today many of the world’s chemicals are produced from fossil fuel–derived feedstocks. Electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) into chemical feedstocks offers a way to turn waste emissions into valuable products, closing the carbon loop. When coupled to renewable sources of electricity, these products can be made with a net negative carbon emissions footprint, helping to sequester CO 2 into usable goods. Research and development into electrocatalytic materials for CO 2 reduction has intensified in recent years, with advances in selectivity, efficiency, and reaction rate progressing toward practical implementation. A variety of chemical products can be made from CO 2 , such as alcohols, oxygenates, synthesis gas (syngas), and olefins—staples in the global chemical industry. Because these products are produced at substantial scale, a switch to renewably powered production could result in a substantial carbon emissions reduction impact. The advancement of electrochemical technology to convert electrons generated from renewable power into stable chemical form also represents one avenue to long-term (e.g., seasonal) storage of energy. ADVANCES: The science of electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction continues to progress, with priority given to the need to pinpoint more accurately the targets for practical application, the economics of chemical products, and barriers to market entry. It will be important to scale CO 2 electrolyzers and increase the stability of these catalysts to thousands of hours of continuous operation. Product separation and efficient recycling of CO 2 and electrolyte also need to be managed. The petrochemical industry operates at a massive scale with a complicated global supply chain and heavy capital costs. Commodity chemical markets are difficult to penetrate and are priced on feedstock, which is currently inexpensive as a result of the shale gas boom. CO 2 capture costs from the flue or direct air and product separation from unreacted CO 2 are also important to consider. Assuming that the advancement of electrocatalytic technologies continues apace, what will it take to disrupt the chemical production sector, and what will society gain by doing so? This review presents a technoeconomic and carbon emissions assessment of CO 2 products such as ethylene, ethanol, and carbon monoxide, offering target figures of merit for practical application. The price of electricity is by far the largest cost driver. Electrochemical production costs begin to match those of traditional fossil fuel–derived processes when electricity prices fall below 4 cents per kWh and energy conversion efficiencies reach at least 60%. When powered by renewable electricity, these products can be made with a net negative carbon emissions footprint. A comparative analysis of electrocatalytic, biocatalytic, and fossil fuel–derived chemical production shows that electrocatalytic production has the potential to yield the greatest reduction in carbon emissions, provided that a steady supply of clean electricity is available. Additionally, opportunities exist to combine electrochemical conversion of CO 2 with a range of other thermo- and biocatalytic processes to slowly electrify the existing petrochemical supply chain and further upgrade CO 2 into more useful chemicals. Technical challenges such as operating lifetime, energy efficiency, and product separation are discussed. Supply chain management of products and entrenched industrial petrochemical competition are also considered. OUTLOOK: There exists increasingly widespread recognition of the need to transition to carbon emissions–free means of chemical production. CO 2 pricing mechanisms are being developed and are seeing increased governmental support. The nascent carbon utilization economy is gaining traction, with startup companies, global prizes, and industrial research efforts all pursuing new carbon conversion technologies. Recent advances in electrochemical CO 2 reduction through the use of gas diffusion electrodes are pushing current densities and selectivities into a realm of industrial use. Despite this progress, there remain technical challenges that must be overcome for commercial application. Additionally, market barriers and cost economics will ultimately decide whether this technology experiences widespread implementation. Electrochemical CO 2 conversion.: Reduction of CO 2 using renewably sourced electricity could transform waste CO 2 emissions into commodity chemical feedstocks or fuels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In recent years, several wind and solar power auctions around the world have been won with prices below 41 $0.03 kWh -1 .”
From The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal (2019) · cites this paper as [41]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Self-citationModern Aspects of Electrochemistry
Bockris, J. O., White, R. E., & Conway, B. E. (2002) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/b114168 · Cited by 5,954
A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis
Carmo, M., Fritz, D., Mergel, J., & Stolten, D. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151 · Cited by 5,797
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Ferrer, I. M., Chatman, S. M., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja510442p · Cited by 4,145
Self-citationNew insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
Self-citationA review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
CO 2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface
Dinh, C.-T., Burdyny, T., Kibria, M. G., Seifitokaldani, A., Gabardo, C. M., García de Arquer, F. P., Kiani, A., Edwards, J. P., De Luna, P., Bushuyev, O. S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9100 · Cited by 2,515
Self-citationCatalysts and Reaction Pathways for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide
Kortlever, R., Shen, J., Schouten, K. J. P., Calle‐Vallejo, F., & Koper, M. T. M. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559 · Cited by 2,214
The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000
Dry, M. E. (2002) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00453-9 · Cited by 2,061
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1007/s12274-015-0965-x · DOI
- COSIA “$20M NRG COSIA Carbon XPRIZE finalists announced; teams ready to test transformative CO 2 technologies at Alberta’s Carbon Conversion Centre” [press release] (2018); www.cosia.ca/resources/news-releases/20m-nrg-cosia-carbon-xprize-finalists-announced-teams-ready-test.
- S. K. Sanyal Cost of geothermal power and factors that affect it. In Proceedings Twenty-Ninth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering (Stanford CA 2004); https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2004/Sanyal.pdf.
- Siemens and Evonik “Evonik and Siemens to generate high-value specialty chemicals from carbon dioxide and eco-electricity” [joint press release] (2018); www.siemens.com/press/pool/de/pressemitteilungen/2018/corporate/PR2018010135COEN.pdf.
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.005 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Effective Carbon Rates 2018: Pricing Carbon Emissions Through Taxes and Emissions Trading (2018). 10.1787/9789264305304-en · DOI
- Transparency Market Research “Global Ethanol Market: Advancement in Production Technologies to boost Market notes TMR” [press release] (2018); www.transparencymarketresearch.com/pressrelease/ethanol-market.htm.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal
Hepburn, C., Adlen, E., Beddington, J., Carter, E. A., Fuss, S., Mac Dowell, N., Minx, J. C., Smith, P., & Williams, C. K. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6 · Cited by 2,523
Yu, Z., Duan, Y., Feng, X., Yu, X., Gao, M., & Yu, S. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007100 · Cited by 1,974
Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning
Zhong, M., Tran, K., Min, Y., Wang, C., Wang, Z., Dinh, C., Luna, P. D., Yu, Z., Rasouli, A. S., Brodersen, P. M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2242-8 · Cited by 1,567
Self-citationMa, W., Xie, S., Liu, T., Fan, Q., Ye, J., Sun, F., Jiang, Z., Zhang, Q., Cheng, J., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-020-0450-0 · Cited by 1,468
Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis
Hauch, A., Küngas, R., Blennow, P., Hansen, A. B., Hansen, J. B., Mathiesen, B. V., & Mogensen, M. B. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba6118 · Cited by 1,448
Metadata
- Authors
- De Luna, P., Hahn, C., Higgins, D., Jaffer, S. A., Jaramillo, T. F., & Sargent, E. H.
- Affiliations
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E4, Canada.
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Total (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2019-04-26
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 6438
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2941803205
- Semantic Scholar
- 5d66417f82d78485dad1260657bfb11da018ccf4
- Cited by
- 3,052
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 425 · 2025: 552 · 2024: 594 · 2023: 462 · 2022: 405 · 2021: 356 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 52
- FWCI
- 9.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0004993)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Keywords
- electrochemical CO2 reduction, renewable electricity, carbon emission reduction, ethylene production, ethanol production, carbon monoxide production, techno-economic analysis, electricity prices, energy conversion efficiency, CO2 capture cost, catalyst stability, product separation, carbon capture and utilization, CO2 sequestration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review