Cited by 59Thoreau and American LiteratureElectronic Health Records SystemsEthics in Clinical Research

Shadow health records meet new data privacy laws

Open access
Price, W. Nicholson, Kaminski, Margot E., Minssen, Timo, Spector-Bagdady, Kayte·2019·Science

Abstract

How will research respond to a changing regulatory space?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aav5133

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CCPA applies to much information in shadow health records, meaning health data collected outside the health system.

    “However, it applies to a great deal of information in so-called “shadow health records”—health data that is collected outside of the health system ([98], p. 449).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Price WN II, Minn. Law Rev. 102, 101 (2018).
  2. [3]Spector-Bagdady K, Shuman AG, Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 158, 405 (2018). 29494320
  3. [4]Tanner A, Our Bodies, Our Data: How Companies Make Billions Selling our Medical Records (Beacon Press, 2017).
  4. [6]Terry NP, Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics 17, 143 (2017). 29756756
  5. [10]Hoofnagle CJ, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3254511, Rochester, NY, 2018; https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=3254511.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, W. N., Kaminski, M. E., Minssen, T., & Spector-Bagdady, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Corresponding author
Price, W. Nicholson
Venue
Science
Published
2019-02
Volume
363
Issue
6426
Pages
448-450
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2911771661
Cited by
59
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eYLS (Yale Law School) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Colorado Law Scholarly Commons (University of Colorado Colorado Springs) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF17SA0027784)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA214829)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
health data privacy, data privacy law, health data regulation, health research
MeSH terms
Big Data, Confidentiality, European Union, Humans, United States, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Genetic Privacy, Information Dissemination, Health Records, Personal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review