PreprintCited by 177Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Healthcare

Open access
Gerke, Sara, Minssen, Timo, Cohen, I. Glenn·2020·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

This chapter will map the ethical and legal challenges posed by artificial intelligence (AI) in health care and suggest directions for resolving them. Section 1 will briefly clarify what AI is and Section 2 will give an idea of the trends and strategies in the United States (U.S.) and Europe, thereby tailoring the discussion to the ethical and legal debate of AI-driven health care. This will be followed in Section 3 by a discussion of four primary ethical challenges, namely: (1) informed consent to use, (2) safety and transparency, (3) algorithmic fairness and biases, and (4) data privacy. Section 4 will then analyze five legal challenges in the U.S. and Europe: (1) safety and effectiveness, (2) liability, (3) data protection and privacy, (4) cybersecurity, and (5) intellectual property law. Finally, Section 5 will summarize the major conclusions and especially emphasize the importance of building an AI-driven health care system that is successful and promotes trust and the motto “Health AIs for All of Us”.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.3570129

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four primary ethical challenges need to be addressed to realize the full potential of AI in health care: informed consent to use, safety and transparency, algorithmic fairness and biases, and data privacy.

    “Gerke et al [92] have discussed four primary ethical challenges that need to be addressed to realize the full potential of AI in health care: (1) informed consent to use, (2) safety and transparency, (3) algorithmic fairness and biases, and (4) data privacy.”
  • From a clinician's perspective, there are concerns around what the clinician's responsibility is in informing patients about the use of AI in their care.

    “From a clinician’s perspective, there are concerns around what the clinician’s responsibility is in informing patients about the use of AI in their care [92].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerke, S., Minssen, T., & Cohen, I. G.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gerke, Sara
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197148688
Cited by
177
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
artificial intelligence in healthcare, AI ethics, AI regulation, informed consent, algorithmic transparency, algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, data privacy, liability, cybersecurity, intellectual property law, data protection, trust in AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review