Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 850

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconstitution and structure of a plant NLR resistosome conferring immunity

Wang, Jizong, Hu, Meijuan, Wang, Jia, Qi, Jinfeng, Han, Zhifu, Wang, Guoxun, Qi, Yijun, Wang, Hong-Wei, Zhou, Jian-Min, Chai, Jijie·2019·Science

Abstract

The plant resistosome comes into focus: Nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) initiate immune responses when they sense a pathogen-associated effector. In animals, oligomerization of NLRs upon binding their effectors is key to downstream activity, but plant systems differ in many ways and their activation mechanisms have been less clear. In two papers, Wang et al. studied the composition and structure of an NLR called ZAR1 in the small mustard plant Arabidopsis (see the Perspective by Dangl and Jones). They determined cryo–electron microscopy structures that illustrate differences between inactive and intermediate states. The active, intermediate state of ZAR1 forms a wheel-like pentamer, called the resistosome. In this activated complex, a set of helices come together to form a funnel-shaped structure required for immune responsiveness and association with the plasma membrane. Science , this issue p. eaav5868 , p. eaav5870 ; see also p. 31

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aav5870

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Hu, M., Wang, J., Qi, J., Han, Z., Wang, G., Qi, Y., Wang, H.-W., Zhou, J.-M., & Chai, J.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
364
Issue
6435
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2924139971
Cited by
850
References
8
FWCI
71.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.