The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right
Abstract
Digital media are critical for contemporary activism—even low-effort “clicktivism” is politically consequential and contributes to offline participation. We argue that in the United States and throughout the industrialized West, left- and right-wing activists use digital and legacy media differently to achieve political goals. Although left-wing actors operate primarily through “hashtag activism” and offline protest, right-wing activists manipulate legacy media, migrate to alternative platforms, and work strategically with partisan media to spread their messages. Although scholarship suggests that the right has embraced strategic disinformation and conspiracy theories more than the left, more research is needed to reveal the magnitude and character of left-wing disinformation. Such ideological asymmetries between left- and right-wing activism hold critical implications for democratic practice, social media governance, and the interdisciplinary study of digital politics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This can be evidenced by the significant amount of attention the BLM hashtag gained, which was partially due to the news coverage that amplified it (Freelon et al. 2020).”
From Reporting on Black Lives Matter in 2020: How Digital Black Press Outlets Covered the Racial Uprisings (2025) · cites this paper as Freelon et al. 2020
In the citing paper
“BLM activists use platforms such as Twitter to directly speak with users and to gain media attention.”
From Reporting on Black Lives Matter in 2020: How Digital Black Press Outlets Covered the Racial Uprisings (2025) · cites this paper as Freelon et al. 2020
Citations
Cites
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau2706 · Cited by 1,803
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4586 · Cited by 1,652
Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 · Cited by 1,504
#HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10858.001.0001 · Cited by 693
Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube
Ribeiro, M. H., Ottoni, R., West, R., Almeida, V. A. F., & Meira, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372879 · Cited by 580
Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice
Freelon, D., McIlwain, C. D., & Clark, M. D. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2747066 · Cited by 566
Self-citationDisinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election
Ferrara, E. (2017) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v22i8.8005 · Cited by 524
Young People, Digital Media, and Engagement: A Meta-Analysis of Research
Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2018) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439318814190 · Cited by 452
Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media
Rogers, R. (2020) · European Journal of Communication · doi:10.1177/0267323120922066 · Cited by 451
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- C. Tilly L. J. Wood Social Movements 1768–2012 (Routledge 2013).
- C. Sunstein Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton Univ. Press 2007).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How social learning amplifies moral outrage expression in online social networks
Brady, W. J., McLoughlin, K., Doan, T. N., & Crockett, M. J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe5641 · Cited by 375
A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231161880 · Cited by 151
Self-citationVaccari, C., & Valeriani, A. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190858476.001.0001 · Cited by 153
Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem
van Dijck, J., de Winkel, T., & Schäfer, M. T. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211045662 · Cited by 116
Visual misinformation on Facebook
Yang, Y., Davis, T., & Hindman, M. (2023) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac051 · Cited by 101
Oser, J. L., Grinson, A., Boulianne, S., & Halperin, E. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2022.2086329 · Cited by 127
Identity propaganda: Racial narratives and disinformation
Reddi, M., Kuo, R., & Kreiss, D. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211029293 · Cited by 99
Self-citationCovid-19 vaccine hesitancy on English-language Twitter
Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., & Thelwall, S. (2021) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2021.mar.12 · Cited by 77
Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter
Huszár, F., Ktena, S. I., O’Brien, C., Belli, L., Schlaikjer, A., & Hardt, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025334119 · Cited by 65
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., & Kaiser, J. (2022) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642221118264 · Cited by 82
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election
Moore, R. C., Dahlke, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01564-2 · Cited by 79
The value affordances of social media engagement features
Scharlach, R., & Hallinan, B. (2023) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmad040 · Cited by 91
Kakavand, A. E. (2023) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2023.2280824 · Cited by 54
Organization and evolution of the UK far-right network on Telegram
Bovet, A., & Grindrod, P. (2022) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-022-00513-8 · Cited by 47
Digital Transformations of the Public Arena
Jungherr, A. M., & Schroeder, R. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009064484 · Cited by 48
The advantage of the right in social media news sharing
González‐Bailón, S., d’Andrea, V., Freelon, D., & Domenico, M. D. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac137 · Cited by 46
Self-citationLi, Y., Bernard, J.-G., & Luczak–Roesch, M. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211035357 · Cited by 52
Misinformation and professional news on largely unmoderated platforms: the case of telegram
Herasimenka, A., Bright, J., Knuutila, A., & Howard, P. N. (2022) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2022.2076272 · Cited by 58
The Influence of Political Ideology on Fake News Belief: The Portuguese Case
Baptista, J. P., Correia, E., Gradim, A., & Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2021) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications9020023 · Cited by 58
“Born for a Storm”: Hard-Right Social Media and Civil Unrest
Karell, D., Linke, A. M., Holland, E. C., & Hendrickson, E. (2023) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224231156190 · Cited by 59
Zhang, Y., Lukito, J., Su, M.-H., Suk, J., Xia, Y., Kim, S. J., Doroshenko, L., & Wells, C. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqaa042 · Cited by 47
Zhang, Y., Lukito, J., Suk, J., & McGrady, R. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2024.2328156 · Cited by 40
Digital Technology, Politics, and Policy-Making
Gilardi, F. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108887304 · Cited by 44
Boulianne, S., Hoffmann, C. P., & Bossetta, M. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241262415 · Cited by 46
Graham, T., Bruns, A., Angus, D. J., Hurcombe, E., & Hames, S. (2020) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x20981780 · Cited by 38
Ideological biases in social sharing of online information about climate change
Cann, T. J. B., Weaver, I. S., & Williams, H. T. P. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0250656 · Cited by 38
Zhang, Y., Shah, D. V., Pevehouse, J. C. W., & Valenzuela, S. (2022) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612211072793 · Cited by 35
Evolution of digital activism on social media: opportunities and challenges
Esparcia, A. C., Castaño, L. C., & Martínez, A. A. (2023) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.may.03 · Cited by 33
Mainstream media use for far-right mobilisation on the alt-tech online platform Gab
Peucker, M., & Fisher, T. J. (2022) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221111943 · Cited by 33
Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users’ activity on fringe social media
Ribeiro, M. H., Hosseinmardi, H., West, R., & Watts, D. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad035 · Cited by 41
Russo, G., Verginer, L., Horta Ribeiro, M., & Casiraghi, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22184 · Cited by 32
Williams Fayne, M., & Richardson, A. V. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612231187562 · Cited by 31
Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512261 · Cited by 31
Moralized language predicts hate speech on social media
Solovev, K., & Pröllochs, N. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac281 · Cited by 30
Suk, J., Zhang, Y., Yue, Z., Wang, R., Dong, X., Yang, D., & Lian, R. (2023) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502231154146 · Cited by 34
Theorizing Connective Democracy: A New Way to Bridge Political Divides
Overgaard, C. S. B., Chen, G. M., Duchovnay, M., & Moore, C. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2119870 · Cited by 32
Introduction: epistemic contestations in the hybrid media environment
Valaskivi, K., & Robertson, D. G. C. (2022) · Popular Communication · doi:10.1080/15405702.2022.2057998 · Cited by 26
New Threats to Society from Free-Speech Social Media Platforms
Bär, D., Pröllochs, N., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3587094 · Cited by 27
Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Literat, I. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197795156.001.0001 · Cited by 28
Understanding Collective Identity in Virtual Spaces: A Study of the Youth Climate Movement
Nasrin, S., & Fisher, D. R. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642211056257 · Cited by 24
Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter
Klein, C., Reimann, R., Quintana, I. O., Cheong, M., Ferreira, M., & Alfano, M. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01384-1 · Cited by 36
Jakubik, J., Vössing, M., Pröllochs, N., Bär, D., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22157 · Cited by 27
Wang, Y., Kim, S. J., Shan, Y., Sun, Y., Jiang, X., Lee, H., Borah, P., Wagner, M. W., & Shah, D. V. (2024) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfae031 · Cited by 22
Designing Trust: Design Style, Political Ideology, and Trust in “Fake” News Websites
Billard, T. J., & Moran, R. E. (2022) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2087098 · Cited by 27
Buckley, N., & Schafer, J. S. (2022) · for(e)dialogue · doi:10.21428/e3990ae6.483f18da · Cited by 20
Wojcieszak, M., Casas, A., Yu, X., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. A. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xwc79 · Cited by 20
Andreeva, I. N., Taggart, M., Lattimer, T. A., Hahn, L., Gillis, S., Vuich, A., Lapan, E., & Reinbold, A. (2025) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642251344214 · Cited by 19
Tripodi, F. B. (2021) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-021-09339-8 · Cited by 21
Exploring Public Sentiment During COVID-19: A Cross Country Analysis
Yu, S., He, S., Cai, Z., Lee, I., Naseriparsa, M., & Xia, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3146633 · Cited by 21
Quantifying participation biases on social media
Pokhriyal, N., Valentino, B. A., & Vosoughi, S. (2023) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00405-6 · Cited by 22
Barrett, B., Dommett, K., & Kreiss, D. (2021) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.266 · Cited by 21
Self-citation“It’s us against them up there”: Spreading online disinformation as populist collective action
Wintterlin, F., Schatto‐Eckrodt, T., Frischlich, L., Boberg, S., Reer, F., & Quandt, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107784 · Cited by 27
Understanding Online Migration Decisions Following the Banning of Radical Communities
Russo, G., Ribeiro, M. H., Casiraghi, G., & Verginer, L. (2023) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3578503.3583608 · Cited by 20
Digital sociology: origin, development, and prospects from a global perspective
Zhao, Y., & Wang, M. (2023) · The Journal of Chinese Sociology · doi:10.1186/s40711-023-00198-1 · Cited by 37
Moran, R. E., & Prochaska, S. (2022) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2022.2146986 · Cited by 16
Hetzel, N., Klawier, T., Prochazka, F., & Schweiger, W. (2022) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2022-4-508 · Cited by 16
Jang, H., & Kreiss, D. (2024) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612241235819 · Cited by 14
Self-citationYoshida, M., Sakaki, T., Kobayashi, T., & Toriumi, F. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98349-2 · Cited by 16
Clever, L., Schatto‐Eckrodt, T., Clever, N., & Frischlich, L. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051221150404 · Cited by 18
Trolling CNN and Fox News on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter
Fichman, P., & Rathi, M. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24753 · Cited by 15
Communication and Deliberation for Environmental Governance
Erbaugh, J. T., Chang, C. H., Masuda, Y. J., & Ribot, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-082450 · Cited by 27
Baptista, J. P., Correia, E., Gradim, A., & Piñeiro-Naval, V. (2021) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2021-1509 · Cited by 15
Balan, V., & Dumitrica, D. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221135886 · Cited by 14
Beyond Digital "Echo Chambers": The Role of Viewpoint Diversity in Political Discussion
Hada, R., Fard, A. E., Shugars, S., Bianchi, F., Rossini, P., Hovy, D., Tromble, R., & Tintarev, N. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570487 · Cited by 16
Whose Advantage? Measuring Attention Dynamics across YouTube and Twitter on Controversial Topics
Lee, J., Wu, S., Ertugrul, A. M., Lin, Y., & Xie, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19316 · Cited by 13
Eddington, S. M., Jarvis, C. M., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2022) · Organization · doi:10.1177/13505084221137989 · Cited by 16
Ribeiro, M. H., Jhaver, S., Cluet-i-Martinell, J., Reignier-Tayar, M., & West, R. (2024) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3710960 · Cited by 18
Marques, F. P. J., Ferracioli, P., Comel, N., & Kniess, A. B. (2023) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849231165579 · Cited by 11
Characterizing User Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
Teng, X., Lin, Y., Chung, W., Li, A., & Kovashka, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19353 · Cited by 12
Trolling asymmetry toward Republicans and Democrats and the shift from foreign to domestic trolling
Fichman, P., & Akter, S. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.101998 · Cited by 12
Merrill, S., & Copsey, N. (2022) · Social movement studies · doi:10.1080/14742837.2022.2142547 · Cited by 10
Smith, M. A. L., & Haenschen, K. (2024) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2024.2347317 · Cited by 9
Kim, N., Kim, H. K., Tan, S. J., Wang, W. H. K., & Ong, K. H. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231153971 · Cited by 10
From discontent to action: #quarantinehotel as not just a hashtag
Gjerald, O., & Eslen‐Ziya, H. (2022) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2022.2051806 · Cited by 9
The role of social media activism in offline conservation attitudes and behaviors
Crespo, Y. A. C., & Cruz, S. M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107858 · Cited by 8
Lots of bots or maybe nots: A process for detecting bots in social media research
Mehmet, M., Callaghan, K., & Lewis, C. (2021) · International Journal of Market Research · doi:10.1177/14707853211027486 · Cited by 8
Lorenz, A., Schmitt, C., McGregor, S. C., & Malmer, D. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.015 · Cited by 8
Platform Multiverse: Discontent and Disconnection among Alt-Rights
Robinson, S. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2022v47n1a4157 · Cited by 8
Who Leads and Who Echoes? Tracing Message Similarity Network of #ClimateChange Advocacy on Twitter
Wu, V. C. S., & Xu, W. W. (2023) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640231174048 · Cited by 8
Exposure to Untrustworthy Websites in the 2020 US ElectionPreprint
Moore, R. C., Dahlke, R., & Hancock, J. T. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6bgqh · Cited by 8
Matamoros-Fernández, A., Bartolo, L., & Alpert, E. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231201648 · Cited by 9
Stepanović, I. (2024) · Nationalities Papers · doi:10.1017/nps.2024.48 · Cited by 9
Hsiao, Y., & Hindman, M. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241300803 · Cited by 7
Beyond Polarization: Right-Wing News as a Quasi-religious Phenomenon
Mann, M., & Winchester, D. (2025) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751251326951 · Cited by 8
How “the left” meme: Analyzing taboo in the Internet memes of r/DankLeft
Merrill, S., Gardell, M., & Lindgren, S. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241232144 · Cited by 7
Academic Coverage of Online Activism of Disabled People: A Scoping Review
Wolbring, G., Nasir, L., & Mahr, D. (2024) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc14110215 · Cited by 7
Dialogue on difference: Identity and political communication
McGregor, S. C., Coe, K., Saldaña, M., Griffin, R., Chavez‐Yenter, D., Huff, M., McDonald, A., Smith, T. R., White, K. C., Valenzuela, S., et al. (2025) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2025.2459648 · Cited by 14
Doerr, N., & Gardner, B. G. (2022) · Translation in Society · doi:10.1075/tris.21008.doe · Cited by 7
Gamir-Ríos, J., & Santos, D. L. (2022) · Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico · doi:10.5209/esmp.82846 · Cited by 7
What’s the News About Bad News? A Review of Bad News Games as a Tool to Teach Media Literacy
Barabas, R. (2023) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libri-2023-0043 · Cited by 7
Revolution by other memes: on the playful subcultures of r/PoliticalCompassMemes
Tuters, M., & Mueller, G. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2423340 · Cited by 6
How False Information Is Used Against Sexual and Gender Minorities and What We Can Do About It
Shuster, S. M., Bunn, G., Joseph, K., & Campos‐Castillo, C. (2025) · Sex & Sexualities · doi:10.1177/3033371251329532 · Cited by 6
Tian, Y., & González‐Bailón, S. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251341496 · Cited by 7
Explaining the diffusion of radical ideas
Hsiao, Y., & Pfaff, S. J. (2022) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.13023 · Cited by 6
Baptista, J. P., Gradim, A., & Correia, E. (2022) · Observatorio (OBS*) · doi:10.15847/obsobs16320222082 · Cited by 9
Desinformación y sexismo digital
Malquín-Robles, A., & Gamir-Ríos, J. (2023) · Revista ICONO14 · doi:10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1963 · Cited by 6
Wong, W. L., & Trilling, D. (2023) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2023.001 · Cited by 10
Shuster, S. M., Campos‐Castillo, C., Madani, N., & Joseph, K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294735 · Cited by 6
Kadivar, M. A., Ketchley, N., Sotoudeh-Sherbaf, A., & Barrie, C. (2024) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcae017 · Cited by 6
Kryvoshein, V. V. (2023) · Futurity of Social Sciences. · doi:10.57125/fs.2023.09.20.02 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Freelon, D., Marwick, A., & Kreiss, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freelon, Deen
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2020-09-04
- Volume
- 369
- Issue
- 6508
- Pages
- 1197-1201
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W3082093598
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- digital activism, clicktivism, hashtag activism, left-wing activism, right-wing activism, disinformation, conspiracy theories, traditional media, partisan media, ideological asymmetry, social media governance, internet and politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review