Cited by 185Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Modelsvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Using digital twins in viral infection

Open access
Laubenbacher, Reinhard, Sluka, James P., Glazier, James A.·2021·Science

Abstract

Personalized computer simulations of infection could allow more effective treatments

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.abf3370

Cites

13 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A main challenge for viral-infection digital twins is that many biological phenomena, such as infections within the body, the immune response to viral pathogens, and some treatments, are poorly understood.

    “Among the main challenges for this type of DT is the fact that many biological phenomena are poorly understood, such as infections within the body and the immune response to viral pathogens, as well as some treatments.”

    From Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

    In “Using digital twins in viral infection,” the paper identifies limited understanding of infection spreading within the body and immune responses as challenges for digital twins. It describes therapies as complex, but does not say that treatments themselves are poorly understood. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]Kovatchev B, Trends Endocrinol. Metab 30, 432 (2019). 31151733
  2. [2]Brown SA, N. Engl. J. Med 381, 1707 (2019). 31618560 PMC7076915
  3. [3]Shang JK, Ann. Thorac. Surg 107, 1232 (2019). 30471273 PMC6516076
  4. [4]Grande Gutierrez N, Int. J. Cardiol 281, 15 (2019). 30728104 PMC6511338
  5. [5]Eddy DM, Schlessinger L, Diabetes Care 26, 3102 (2003). 14578246
  6. [6]Stockman LJ, Bellamy R, Garner P, PLOS Med. 3, e343 (2006). 16968120 PMC1564166
  7. [8]Beyer M, PLOS ONE 7, e45466 (2012). 23029029 PMC3448669
  8. [9]Martines RB, U.S. Emerg. Infect. Dis 26, 2005 (2020). 32437316 PMC7454055
  9. [10]Kolanjiyil AV, Kleinstreuer C, Comput. Biol. Med 79, 193 (2016). 27810625
  10. [11]Cross TJ, PLOS ONE 8, e66950 (2013). 23840561 PMC3694127
  11. [12]Goyal A, Cardozo-Ojeda EF, Schiffer JT, Sci. Adv 6, eabc7112 (2020). 33097472 PMC7679107
  12. [13]Sego TJ, PLOS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008451 (2020). 33347439 PMC7785254
  13. [14]Alber M, NPJ Digit. Med 2, 115 (2019). 31799423 PMC6877584

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laubenbacher, R., Sluka, J. P., & Glazier, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Science
Published
2021-03-12
Volume
371
Issue
6534
Pages
1105-1106
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3135755054
Cited by
169
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 7
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM122424, R01GM127909)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI135128)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01EB024501, U24EB028887)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
digital twin, viral infection, personalized medicine, treatment optimization
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Software, Virus Diseases, Precision Medicine, Patient-Specific Modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review