Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Convergent acquisition of disulfide-forming enzymes in malodorous flowers

Okuyama, Yudai, Fukushima, Kenji, Kakishima, Satoshi, Valchanova, Anna K., Takano, Kohei Takenaka, Ito-Inaba, Yasuko, Nakazato, Takeru, Nagano, Atsushi J.·2025·Science

Abstract

Identifying the metabolic and genetic changes that confer evolutionary novelty is essential for understanding the factors facilitating or constraining the occurrence of traits. We show that dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), a volatile compound that attracts saprophilous pollinators, is produced by a disulfide synthase (DSS) in the plant genus Asarum (Aristolochiaceae). DSS is derived from methanethiol oxidase (MTOX), an enzyme conserved among animals and plants, and similar DSS enzymes have independently evolved in two other plant genera. Three amino acid changes shared among the DSSs of independent origins were sufficient to cause a functional switch between MTOX and DSS. The small number of amino acid changes and the co-option of a highly conserved enzyme may explain why DMDS-emitting flowers are widespread among floral mimics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.adu8988

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For simple traits with easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis, PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype-to-phenotype maps.

    “On one end, we can conceptualize “simple” traits with both easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis. Here PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype to phenotype maps (Lamichhaney et al. 2019; Nagy et al. 2020; Okuyama et al. 2025).”
  • After identifying the responsible gene, Okuyama et al. used CSUBST to identify replicated amino acid substitutions in the foreground lineages.

    “After identifying the responsible gene, they used CSUBST (Fukushima and Pollock 2023) to identify replicated amino acid substitutions in the foreground lineages.”
  • Okuyama et al.'s study highlights how PhyloG2P methods can complement other molecular genetics methods.

    “This study highlights how PhyloG2P methods can compliment other molecular genetics methods.”
  • Okuyama et al.'s analysis identified three substitutions within the gene that had occurred in all three independent transitions studied.

    “Their analysis identified three substitutions within the gene that had occurred in all three independent transitions studied.”
  • Okuyama et al.'s follow-up experiments manipulating those three sites confirmed they were necessary and sufficient to cause the phenotypic change.

    “Their follow up experiments manipulating those three sites confirmed they were necessary and sufficient to cause the phenotypic change.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1111/nph.12416 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.aau5656 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.0706229104 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41467-020-20507-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00960.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.053 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.008 · DOI
  8. J. Felsenstein, Inferring Phylogenies (Sinauer Associates, 2004).
  9. 10.1126/science.adj9228 · DOI
  10. A. Jürgens A. Shuttleworth “Carrion and dung mimicry in plants”in Carrion Ecology Evolution and Their Applications M. E. Benbow J. K. Tomberlin A. M. Tarone Eds. (CRC Press 2015) pp. 361–386.
  11. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732693.001.0001 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.047 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/15592324.2021.1991712 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/ele.12152 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/420625a · DOI
  16. 10.1039/D3NP00024A · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s00049-014-0169-y · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.06.005 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/bk-2011-1068.ch001 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s00114-015-1288-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/iub.255 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/aob/mcaa072 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/1438-390X.12121 · DOI
  24. Y. Maeda “Distribution and life cycle of the wild gingers (Asarum Aristolochiaseae) on Amami-Oshima South Japan ”thesis Kagoshima University Japan (2013).
  25. S. Kakishima, Y. Okuyama, Floral scent profiles and flower visitors in species of Asarum series Sakawanum (Aristolochiaceae). Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. B Bot. 44, 41–51 (2018).
  26. S. Kakishima, M. Sueyoshi, Y. Okuyama, Floral visits of Cordyla murina (Mycetophilidae) and other dipterans to Asarum asaroides (Aristolochiaceae) and the possible role of mushroom-like scents. Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. B Bot. 47, 227–236 (2021).
  27. 10.1111/plb.13456 · DOI
  28. P. C. Jocelyn, Biochemistry of the SH Group: The Occurrence, Chemical Properties, Metabolism and Biological Function of Thiols and Disulphides (Academic Press, 1972).
  29. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01955 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41559-018-0710-4 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/pcp/pcl055 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-020-18090-8 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ismej.2017.148 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41588-017-0006-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102807 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.0801038105 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.054 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.066 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00239-023-10105-4 · DOI
  41. R. V. Leerdam “Anaerobic degradation of methanethiol in a process for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) biodesulfurization ”thesis Wageningen University Netherlands (2007).
  42. 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2155-2162.2006 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/s41564-020-0697-x · DOI
  44. 10.1021/je000236i · DOI
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/nbt.1883 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nprot.2013.084 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nbt.3519 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.063 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1111/2041-210X.12612 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/sysbio/syr118 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101972 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.002 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41559-016-0059 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/molbev/msaa141 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Okuyama, Y., Fukushima, K., Kakishima, S., Valchanova, A. K., Takano, K. T., Ito-Inaba, Y., Nakazato, T., & Nagano, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Tsukuba Botanical Garden, Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan.
  • The Mt. Fuji Institute for Nature and Biology, Showa Medical University, Fuji-Yoshida, Japan.
  • Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagano Environmental Conservation Research Institute, Nagano, Japan.
  • Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
  • Database Center for Life Science, Research Organization of Information and Systems, Chiba, Japan.
  • Faculty of Agriculture, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Japan.
Venue
Science
Published
2025-05-08
Volume
388
Issue
6747
Pages
656-661
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
17
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review