The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 112 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
From Trees to Traits: A Review of Advances in PhyloG2P Methods and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Mapping genotypes to phenotypes is a fundamental goal in biology. Phylogenetic Genotype to Phenotype mapping methods are a relatively new set of tools that aim to identify genomic regions associated with trait variation between species. Here, we review recent developments in Phylogenetic Genotype to Phenotype mapping methods, focusing on three key areas: methods based on replicated substitutions at individual amino acid sites; methods detecting changes in evolutionary rates; and methods analyzing gene duplication and loss. We discuss how trait definition and measurement can impact these methods, as well as the genetic mechanisms that can give rise to trait variation between lineages. We examine the strengths and limitations of different approaches, highlighting the importance of explicit modeling of evolutionary processes. Finally, we outline promising future directions, including the integration of within-species variation, as well as epigenetic and environmental information. Since no single method is likely to identify all genomic regions of interest, we encourage users to apply a representative range of methods that are capable of detecting different types of associations. Overall, this review provides practitioners a roadmap for understanding and applying Phylogenetic Genotype to Phenotype mapping approaches.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes recent Phylogenetic Genotype-to-Phenotype (PhyloG2P) methods that use replicated evolution across lineages to link genomic changes to trait variation between species. It groups methods into three categories—replicated amino acid substitutions, evolutionary-rate changes, and gene duplication/loss—and argues that no single method will capture all relevant genomic regions, so users should apply a representative range across coding and noncoding elements.
Key findings
- PhyloG2P methods fall into three broad categories: replicated amino acid substitutions, changes in evolutionary rates, and duplication/loss of genetic elements; Table 1 lists current methods and example applications across these categories.
- Replicated evolution provides statistical power to distinguish phenotype-associated genetic changes from background variation, but trait definition matters: binary presence/absence can oversimplify biology, while continuous traits can increase power and reveal what aspect of a trait is controlled.
- The review highlights that complex traits may show limited genetic repeatability: Eastment et al. (2024) studied 17 independent transitions to viviparity across vertebrate genomes spanning over 400 million years and found no gene family changed significantly in more than six lineages.
- Zhang et al. (2023) used methods from all three categories across seven independent alpine transitions in angiosperms, identifying replicated gene-family expansions related to hypoxia tolerance and contractions in immune-response families; Okuyama et al. (2025) identified three substitutions in a gene across all three independent transitions studied and confirmed they were necessary and sufficient to cause the phenotypic change.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of PhyloG2P methods, building on earlier reviews by Rey et al. (2019), Smith et al. (2020), Nagy et al. (2020), and Pereira and Kohlsdorf (2023), with emphasis on recent developments.
- Data or sample: no primary data; the paper synthesizes published methods and example applications, organized in Table 1 by method category, noncoding-region applicability, relaxed matching, continuous-trait applicability, and duplication/loss detection.
- Main analysis: qualitative synthesis of evolutionary mechanisms, method assumptions, trait measurement, ancestral state reconstruction, tree topology issues, and future directions including within-species variation, epigenetic/environmental information, and machine learning approaches.
Limitations
- The paper states that most PhyloG2P methods rely on accurate ancestral state reconstruction, which can be inaccurate when traits evolve non-neutrally; methods also depend on orthologous alignments and may fail when replication involves lineage-specific paralogues or deep divergence.
- The paper states that current methods often rely on a single representative trait value and consensus genome per lineage, ignoring within-lineage phenotypic and genotypic variation, and that few PhyloG2P applications are followed up with transgenic or knockout experiments.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not perform a systematic quantitative meta-analysis, and its conclusions about method performance draw on selected example applications rather than a standardized comparative benchmark.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
12 of 112 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning
The need for genome-wide statistical analysis methods with low error rates prompted the development of several new and updated phylogenetic methods that could be applied to genomic data.
“This need prompted the development of several new and updated phylogenetic methods that could be applied to this genomic data (Zou and Zhang 2015; Prudent et al. 2016; Rey et al. 2018; Hu et al. 2019; Kowalczyk et al. 2019; Treaster et al. 2021; Duchemin et al. 2022; Fukushima and Pollock 2023; Morel et al. 2024)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Several recent studies have applied multiple complementary PhyloG2P methods.
“This diversity has been actively embraced with several recent studies applying multiple complementary PhyloG2P methods (Eliason et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023; Eastment et al. 2024; Matsuda and Makino 2024)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Eastment et al. (2024) constructed a set of gene alignments from vertebrate genomes spanning over 400 million years of evolution that included 17 independent transitions to viviparity, a far larger number than earlier PhyloG2P studies.
“Eastment et al. constructed a set of gene alignments from vertebrate genomes spanning over 400 million years of evolution that included 17 independent transitions to viviparity, a far larger number than earlier PhyloG2P studies (Yusuf et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
The Background states that the study used vertebrate whole-genome data spanning more than 400 million years and accounting for 17 independent transitions to viviparity. But the Methods (Whole genome alignments) say the default alignment used for substitution-rate analysis accounted for 14 transitions; the 17-transition figure describes the broader dataset, not specifically its coding-gene alignments. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Yusuf et al. 2023 source
- Rests on an assumption: Viviparity has independently evolved many times in vertebrates such as squamate reptiles and fish, as well as once in mammals.
- Rests on an assumption: Few previous studies had used genome-wide approaches to explore whether the same genes were involved in independent transitions to viviparity across deep evolutionary time scales.
- Premisecitation
Gene ontology enrichment tests have often identified significant enrichment in functions related to the trait of interest.
“This verification can be done through gene ontology enrichment tests, which have often identified significant enrichment in functions related to the trait of interest (Chikina et al. 2016; Prudent et al. 2016; Nagy et al. 2017; Hu et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2023; Redlich et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Expanding the phylogenetic breadth of a study may reveal additional biological variation, such as more phenotypic categories or intermediate phenotypes between presence and absence.
“For example, expanding the phylogenetic breadth of a study may reveal additional biological variation, such as more phenotypic categories or intermediate phenotypes between “presence” and “absence” (Redlich et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Redlich et al. 2024 source
- Premisereasoning
The third group of PhyloG2P methods search for duplications or losses of genetic elements.
“The third group search for duplications or losses of genetic elements, encompassing a variety of genetic phenomena and phenotypic transitions associated with these changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Identical substitutions at the same nucleotide position or amino acid may cause identical phenotypic changes, such as resistance to a common toxin.
“For instance, identical substitutions (or insertions/deletions) at the same nucleotide position or amino acid may cause identical phenotypic changes (Fig. 2a), such as resistances to a common toxin (Zhen et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhen et al. 2012 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
Single-lineage PhyloG2P studies primarily deepen understanding of existing genotype-to-phenotype maps rather than developing novel ones.
“While successfully applied across a range of organisms, this PhyloG2P approach primarily deepens our understanding of existing genotype to phenotype maps, rather than developing novel ones.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Changes in phenotype can be produced by duplication or loss of entire genes or noncoding regulatory elements.
“Changes in phenotype can also be produced by duplication or loss of entire genes or noncoding regulatory elements (Nagy et al. 2014, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nagy et al. 2014, 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Successfully identifying the genetic elements controlling traits with low pleiotropic constraint or high genetic redundancy from a PhyloG2P perspective would require prior knowledge of the genetic elements likely to be involved.
“Successfully identifying the genetic elements controlling such traits from a PhyloG2P perspective would require prior knowledge of the genetic elements likely to be involved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Changes in different sites within the same gene or regulatory element may produce a replicated phenotypic change.
“Changes in different sites within the same gene or regulatory element may also produce a replicated phenotypic change (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sykes et al. 2022 source
- Interpretationcitation
If a replicated change in phenotype has been achieved through changes in different genetic elements, PhyloG2P methods will fail to identify them unless considerable prior knowledge of the genetic elements involved can be leveraged to identify genetic replication at the network or pathway level.
“If a replicated change in phenotype has been achieved through changes in different genetic elements, then PhyloG2P methods will fail to identify them unless considerable prior knowledge of the genetic elements involved can be leveraged to identify genetic replication at the network or pathway level (Lamichhaney et al. 2019; Wheeler et al. 2022; Eastment et al. 2024; Shakya et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lamichhaney et al. 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Wheeler et al. 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisereasoning
PhyloG2P methods have seen a surge of development and application over the past decade.
“PhyloG2P methods have seen a surge of development and application over the past decade.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The multilineage PhyloG2P approach has the significant advantage of being able to identify novel genotype-to-phenotype associations without requiring detailed prior knowledge about the genetic elements involved.
“While this PhyloG2P approach has some limitations (discussed in the following subsections), it has the significant advantage of being able to identify novel genotype to phenotype associations without requiring detailed prior knowledge about the genetic elements involved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In single-lineage PhyloG2P studies, because most lineages have a substantial number of unique phenotypic features, identified genetic changes may be associated with any of these features rather than the phenotype of interest.
“However, since most lineages will have a substantial number of unique phenotypic features, the identified genetic changes may be associated with any of these features rather than the phenotype of interest”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Most lineages have a substantial number of unique phenotypic features.
- Premisecitation
As sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates.
“However, as sequenced genomes rapidly increased in availability over the past 20 years, it became clear that there was a need for statistical analysis methods that could be applied genome-wide while maintaining low error rates (Nagy et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nagy et al. 2020 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisereasoning
Not all traits associated with marine mammals are exclusive to their marine adaptation.
“However, not all of the traits associated with marine mammals are exclusive to their marine adaptation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evolved resistance to hypoxia is important to marine mammals because it facilitates extended dive duration.
“For example, the evolved resistance to the stress of hypoxia (low blood oxygen) is important to marine mammals, as it facilitates extended dive duration (Chikina et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chikina et al. 2016 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
If a genetic network controlling a trait has a low pleiotropic constraint or high genetic redundancy, genetic changes in different genetic pathways may create similar trait changes.
“Alternatively, if a genetic network controlling a trait has a low pleiotropic constraint, or high genetic redundancy, then genetic changes in different genetic pathways may create similar trait changes (Griesmann et al. 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Griesmann et al. 2018 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisenone given
Each PhyloG2P method uses a different statistical framework to determine the significance of identified correlations, based on its defined criteria for what constitutes replicated evolution.
“Each method uses a different statistical framework to determine the significance of identified correlations, based on their defined criteria for what constitutes replicated evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Presence/absence based PhyloG2P studies have successfully identified links between genetic elements and traits, especially in the context of trait loss.
“While presence/absence based studies have successfully identified links between genetic elements and traits (Chikina et al. 2016; Eliason et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023), especially in the context of trait loss (Prudent et al. 2016; Partha et al. 2019; Sackton et al. 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chikina et al. 2016 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Eliason et al. 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
As the CSUBST metric accounts for the expected number of both synonymous and nonsynonymous replicated substitutions, it is also robust to poor estimations of those expected numbers, which can pose a challenge for several other methods.
“Additionally, as the metric accounts for the expected number of both synonymous and nonsynonymous replicated substitutions, it is also robust to poor estimations of those expected numbers, which can pose a challenge for several of the other methods (Zou and Zhang 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zou and Zhang 2015 source
- Premisecitation
Rates-based PhyloG2P methods search for genetic elements that evolve at different rates in foreground and background lineages.
“PhyloG2P methods based on changes in evolutionary rates search for genetic elements which evolve at different rates in foreground and background lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Treaster et al. 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisereasoning
Over time, the loss of selective pressure associated with trait loss will lead to the accumulation of various mutational changes across all impacted homologous genetic elements.
“While changes in a trait may be caused by a small number of genetic changes as described above, over time the loss of selective pressure associated with trait loss will lead to the accumulation of various mutational changes across all impacted homologous genetic elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Genetic changes in different genetic networks may produce similar changes in a phenotype.
“Finally, genetic changes in different genetic networks, may produce similar changes in a phenotype (Fig. 2e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
The first group of PhyloG2P methods search for replication at individual amino acid sites.
“The first group search for replication at individual amino acid sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
When a homologous trait has been lost multiple times in independent lineages, there is a relatively high chance of replicated increases in substitution rate, or reductions in copy number of genetic elements associated with the trait.
“As a result, when a homologous trait has been lost multiple times in independent lineages, there is a relatively high chance of replicated increases in substitution rate, or reductions in copy number of genetic elements associated with the trait (Hiller et al. 2012; Nagy et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisenone given
Many early phylogenetic methods for identifying correlations between phenotypic and genotypic changes saw limited application, largely because of their poor statistical properties, such as simplistic null models leading to poor false positive rates.
“Many of these early methods saw limited application, largely because of their poor statistical properties, such as simplistic null models leading to poor false positive rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The evolutionary perspective of PhyloG2P enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement.
“This evolutionary perspective enables genotype to phenotype mapping in situations where typical population genetics approaches would be challenging, if not impossible to implement (Nagy et al. 2020; Smith et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
PhyloG2P studies based on continuous traits can provide a more detailed understanding of what aspect of the trait the genetic elements control.
“PhyloG2P studies based on continuous traits can also provide a more detailed understanding of what aspect of the trait the genetic elements control (e.g. length, developmental timing, colour, etc) (Kowalczyk et al. 2020; Baker et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Many available PhyloG2P methods depend on replicated evolution because independent evolutionary transitions provide the statistical power to distinguish phenotype-associated genetic changes from background genomic variation.
“However, many available PhyloG2P methods depend on replicated evolution, as these independent evolutionary transitions provide the statistical power to distinguish phenotype-associated genetic changes from background genomic variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Utilizing evolutionary replication provides greater power to differentiate lineage-specific genetic changes from those that are shared between some or all of the lineages with the phenotype of interest.
“Utilizing evolutionary replication provides greater power to differentiate lineage-specific genetic changes from those that are shared between some or all of the lineages with the phenotype of interest.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lineages may achieve a similar phenotypic change through substitutions in, or duplications of, distinct genetic elements that are part of the same genetic pathway or network where changes have similar impacts on network function.
“These distinct genetic elements may be part of the same genetic pathway or network where changes have similar impacts on network function (Láruson et al. 2020; Shakya et al. 2025) (Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype-to-phenotype relationships even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization.
“It has also been noted that utilizing replicated evolution provides a key advantage for discovering genotype to phenotype relationships, even in genomic regions with no prior functional characterization (Nagy et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nagy et al. 2020 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationcitation
Presence/absence based studies may oversimplify the biological processes under investigation, limiting the insights gained.
“they may also oversimplify the biological processes under investigation, limiting the insights gained (Lamichhaney et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lamichhaney et al. 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
Replicated loss of homologous traits has been the focus of many PhyloG2P studies because it has a high chance of producing replicated genetic changes.
“Replicated loss of homologous traits has been the focus of many PhyloG2P studies, as it has a high chance of producing replicated genetic changes (Prudent et al. 2016; Sackton et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
PhyloG2P methods that utilize replicated evolution may struggle when there is a low chance of any of the genetic changes being replicated across lineages.
“PhyloG2P methods that utilize replicated evolution may struggle in such cases, as there is a low chance of any of the genetic changes being replicated across lineages (Zou and Zhang 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zou and Zhang 2015 source
- Premisecitation
Evolved resistance to hypoxia has also been essential for mammals that have transitioned to subterranean or high altitude environments.
“However, evolved resistance to hypoxia has also been essential for mammals that have transitioned to subterranean or high altitude environments, where oxygen availability is also limited (Wang et al. 2024) (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationcitation
To fully characterize the genetic changes associated with evolutionary adaptations involving multiple traits, the traits may need to be investigated individually in addition to studying their collective replicated evolution.
“Therefore, to fully characterize the genetic changes associated with evolutionary adaptations involving multiple traits, such as those seen in marine mammals, the traits may need to be investigated individually in addition to studying their collective replicated evolution (Speed and Arbuckle 2017; Lamichhaney et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Speed and Arbuckle 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lamichhaney et al. 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisereasoning
The second group of PhyloG2P methods search for either individual or replicated changes in the rate of genetic evolution.
“The second group of approaches search for either individual or replicated changes in the rate of genetic evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Searching for genetic changes that are exclusively found in marine mammals may fail to detect some genetic elements underpinning hypoxia tolerance, because this adaptation is shared with other nonmarine lineages.
“As such, searching for genetic changes that are exclusively found in marine mammals may fail to detect some genetic elements underpinning hypoxia tolerance, as this adaptation is shared with other nonmarine lineages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many PhyloG2P studies analyze traits as binary presence/absence patterns across lineages.
“Many PhyloG2P studies analyze traits as a binary presence/absence pattern across lineages, as they can be relatively simple to measure for a large number of individuals or species (Stefen et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stefen et al. 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
The results of PhyloG2P studies will depend in part on where traits lie along a spectrum of complexity.
“We suggest that the results of PhyloG2P studies will depend in part on where traits lie along a spectrum of complexity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For genetic networks under a high degree of pleiotropic constraint, only a limited number of genetic changes may produce a particular trait change without causing deleterious changes in other traits controlled by the network.
“For genetic networks under a high degree of pleiotropic constraint, only a limited number of genetic changes may produce a particular trait change without causing deleterious changes in other traits controlled by the network (Stern 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stern 2013 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Measuring traits continuously rather than categorically can enhance statistical power.
“Similarly, measuring traits continuously rather than categorically can enhance statistical power, as for each lineage there is often more information than just the presence/absence of a trait.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The likelihood of similar phenotypic changes being achieved through similar genetic changes in distinct lineages depends on the degree of pleiotropy and genetic redundancy in the genetic elements and networks that control the trait.
“The likelihood of similar phenotypic changes being achieved through similar genetic changes in distinct lineages depends on the degree of pleiotropy (Zhang 2023) (where a single genetic element can affect multiple traits) and genetic redundancy (Láruson et al. 2020) (where multiple different mutations can have similar impacts on a trait) in the genetic elements and networks that control the trait.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Zhang 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Láruson et al. 2020 source
- Premisecitation
CSUBST uniquely examines replicated codon changes by independently analyzing synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.
“CSUBST uniquely examines replicated codon changes by independently analyzing synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fukushima and Pollock 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationcitation
By accounting for synonymous substitutions, the CSUBST metric is robust to errors in topology which can confound other methods.
“By accounting for synonymous substitutions, this metric is robust to errors in topology which can confound the other methods described above (Mendes and Hahn 2016; Mendes et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
For simple traits with easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis, PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype-to-phenotype maps.
“On one end, we can conceptualize “simple” traits with both easily quantifiable phenotypes and a simple genetic basis. Here PhyloG2P studies will have a chance to identify specific genotype to phenotype maps (Lamichhaney et al. 2019; Nagy et al. 2020; Okuyama et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Other recent studies have used only a single PhyloG2P method.
“However, there have been other recent studies that only use a single PhyloG2P method (Xu et al. 2021; Sakamoto et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Xu et al. 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sakamoto et al. 2024 source
- Premisecitation
PhyloG2P studies have revealed genetic replication in noncoding regions when it was not found in coding regions.
“Similarly, PhyloG2P studies have revealed the presence of genetic replication in noncoding regions when it was not found in coding regions (Langer et al. 2018; Feigin et al. 2019; Thomas et al. 2024; Shakya et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
PhyloG2P methods can also be used to complement other molecular and genetics approaches.
“PhyloG2P methods can also be used to compliment other molecular and genetics approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Rates-based methods can identify genetic elements under positive selection where multiple different mutations cause a similar phenotypic change, which single-site methods may miss.
“Additionally, in the context of replicated phenotypic transitions, evolutionary rates-based methods can identify genetic elements experiencing positive selection in which multiple different mutations could cause a similar change in phenotype (Fig. 2b), which may not be identified by methods based on replicated changes at single sites (Treaster et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Treaster et al. 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
Transgenic or knockout experiments are important because they provide evidence of causal relationships between a genetic element and a trait.
“These experiments are important, as they provide evidence of causal relationships between a genetic element and a trait (Losos 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Losos 2011 source
- Premisecitation
ESL uses binary encoding to enable joint analysis of any genetic feature, such as SNPs or presence/absence of a genetic element, as well as epigenetic or environmental variables.
“ESL uses binary encoding to enable joint analysis of any genetic feature, such as SNPs or presence/absence of a genetic element, as well as epigenetic or environmental variables.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar and Sharma 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
There are many other epigenetic and transcriptomic features of genomes which can impact phenotypes, including DNA methylation, chromatin structure, structural rearrangements, and interactions between RNA, proteins, and their environment.
“These features include DNA methylation, chromatin structure, structural rearrangements (Vargas-Chavez et al. 2025), and the interactions between RNA, proteins, and their environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vargas-Chavez et al. 2025 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
These forms of variance are particularly important for the analysis of traits with continuous values, as allelic variation between individuals may contribute to significantly different values of the trait.
“These forms of variance are particularly important for the analysis of traits with continuous values, as allelic variation between individuals may contribute to significantly different values of the trait (such as height or lifespan).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Allelic variation between individuals may contribute to significantly different values of continuous traits.
- Interpretationreasoning
Another barrier is computational intensity.
“Another barrier is computational intensity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
There is no single approach to determine the replicated genetic changes underlying phenotypic replication.
“The diversity of methods available means that there is no one single approach to determine the replicated genetic changes underlying phenotypic replication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Zhang et al. (2023) used PhyloG2P methods from all three categories (replicated amino acid substitutions, changes in evolutionary rates, and duplication/loss of genetic elements) to identify genetic replication across seven independent alpine transitions in the angiosperms.
“Zhang et al. (2023) used PhyloG2P methods from all three categories (replicated amino acid substitutions, changes in evolutionary rates, and duplication/loss of genetic elements) to identify genetic replication across seven independent alpine transitions in the angiosperms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Many lineages of angiosperm plants have independently adapted to harsh alpine environments.
- Interpretationnone given
An important limitation of current PhyloG2P methods is that they rely on a single "representative" trait value and consensus genome for each lineage, which does not account for the phenotypic and genotypic variation within lineages.
“An important limitation of current PhyloG2P methods is that they rely on a single “representative” trait value and consensus genome for each lineage, which does not account for the phenotypic and genotypic variation within lineages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Trait values can vary widely within lineages, and this variance will likely not be consistent through time or between lineages.
- Interpretationcitation
It is likely that allelic variation within populations that have undergone replicated phenotypic evolution will show corresponding signs of adaptation in the genetic elements controlling the trait.
“It is also likely that allelic variation within populations that have undergone replicated phenotypic evolution will show corresponding signs of adaptation in the genetic elements controlling the trait (Barghi et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barghi et al. 2020 source
- Interpretationcitation
Okuyama et al.'s study highlights how PhyloG2P methods can complement other molecular genetics methods.
“This study highlights how PhyloG2P methods can compliment other molecular genetics methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuyama et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
The subset of lineages in which Eastment et al. detected the replicated gene family contraction have all previously been identified as no longer producing yolk, including mammals.
“However, the subset of lineage that Eastment et al. (2024) detected the replicate gene family contraction in have all previously been identified as no longer producing yolk (including mammals).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationreasoning
There are potential barriers that can prevent the widespread application of PhyloG2P methods.
“There are potential barriers that can prevent the widespread application of PhyloG2P methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Zhang et al. (2023)'s study demonstrates how different categories of PhyloG2P methods can identify distinct sets of genetic elements related to changes in component traits involved in complex phenotypic adaptations.
“Zhang et al. (2023)’s study demonstrates how the different categories of PhyloG2P methods can identify distinct sets of genetic elements related to changes in component traits involved in complex phenotypic adaptations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Okuyama et al.'s analysis identified three substitutions within the gene that had occurred in all three independent transitions studied.
“Their analysis identified three substitutions within the gene that had occurred in all three independent transitions studied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuyama et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
ESL is orders of magnitude less computationally intensive than the PhyloG2P models discussed in this review.
“As well as its capacity to integrate a variety of variables relevant to phenotypic prediction, ESL is also orders of magnitude less computationally intensive than the PhyloG2P models discussed in this review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar and Sharma 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisenone given
Phenotypic replication can be caused by replicated changes at several genetic levels in both coding and noncoding genetic elements.
“Phenotypic replication can be caused by replicated changes at several genetic levels in both coding and noncoding genetic elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
One barrier is the accessibility of PhyloG2P methods from a technical perspective.
“One is the accessibility of PhyloG2P methods from a technical perspective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Relatively few applications of PhyloG2P methods have been followed up by transgenic or knockout experiments to verify the role of genetic elements identified in their analysis.
“However, relatively few applications of PhyloG2P methods have been followed up by transgenic or knockout experiments to verify the role of genetic elements identified in their analysis (Booker et al. 2016; Sackton et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2021; Okuyama et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
One shortcoming of using machine learning is that it does not explicitly model evolutionary processes, complicating the interpretation of the features it identifies.
“However, one shortcoming of using machine learning is that it does not explicitly model evolutionary processes, complicating the interpretation of the features it identifies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Machine learning does not explicitly model evolutionary processes.
- Premisecitation
Evolutionary rates analysis by Zhang et al. identified replicated changes in genes across different biological pathways.
“Evolutionary rates analysis identified replicated changes in genes across different biological pathways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
RERconverge requires branches to be assigned as foreground or background through ancestral state reconstruction, which can be challenging for many traits.
“The first issue is that RERconverge requires branches to be assigned as foreground or background through ancestral state reconstruction, which can be challenging for many traits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Treaster et al. 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisecitation
The δ statistic and RERconverge generally identify distinct sets of genetic elements for nonbinary categorical traits.
“Redlich et al. (2024) found that the δ statistic and RERconverge generally identified distinct sets of genetic elements, suggesting that further research into the impacts of these two approaches to modeling changes in evolutionary rate may be required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Redlich et al. 2024 source
- Premisecitation
Okuyama et al.'s follow-up experiments manipulating those three sites confirmed they were necessary and sufficient to cause the phenotypic change.
“Their follow up experiments manipulating those three sites confirmed they were necessary and sufficient to cause the phenotypic change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuyama et al. 2025 source
- Premisecitation
Okuyama et al. (2025) used a range of transcriptomic, molecular, and transgenic approaches to understand the genetic mechanisms underlying replicated changes in floral scent compounds.
“Okuyama et al. (2025) used a range of transcriptomic, molecular, and transgenic approaches to understand the genetic mechanisms underlying replicated changes in floral scent compounds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuyama et al. 2025 source
- Premisereasoning
Uncertainty in ancestral state reconstruction remains an important limitation for drawing conclusions from PhyloG2P analysis.
“However, uncertainty in ancestral state reconstruction still represents an important limitation, and it’s potential impacts should be considered carefully when drawing conclusions from PhyloG2P analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Zhang et al. identified accelerated evolution of genes relating to self-incompatibility using RERconverge.
“They also identified the accelerated evolution of genes relating to self-incompatibility (the inability to self fertilize) using RERconverge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
High computational demands can limit the capacity for researchers to analyze genomic data.
“While high computational demands are common in genomic analysis, they can limit the capacity for researchers to analyze genomic data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: High computational demands are common in genomic analysis.
- Premisecitation
Eastment et al. identified a contraction of a gene family related to yolk development in a subset of viviparous species.
“Notably, they identified a contraction of a gene family related to yolk development in a subset of viviparous species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisereasoning
PhyloAcc's comparison of M1 over M2 prevents false positives from acceleration associated with a nonforeground trait, which other rates-based methods often do not account for.
“The second comparison with M2 prevents potential false positives resulting from acceleration associated with a nonforeground trait, which are often not accounted for in other rates-based methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
After identifying the responsible gene, Okuyama et al. used CSUBST to identify replicated amino acid substitutions in the foreground lineages.
“After identifying the responsible gene, they used CSUBST (Fukushima and Pollock 2023) to identify replicated amino acid substitutions in the foreground lineages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTrait loss may occur when a change in the environment of a lineage makes a trait redundant, or when a change in development has the side effect of causing a trait to no longer form.
“Trait loss may occur when a change in the environment of a lineage makes a trait redundant (Partha et al. 2019), or when a change in development has the side effect of causing a trait to no longer form (Womack et al. 2018; Pereira and Kohlsdorf 2023; Womack and Hoke 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationTogether, findings of Yusuf et al. (2023) and Eastment et al. (2024) suggest that complex traits evolving over large timescales show limited genetic repeatability, likely reflecting redundancy in the genetic routes that can lead to viviparity.
“Together, the findings of Yusuf et al. (2023) and Eastment et al. (2024) suggests that complex traits evolving over large timescales show limited genetic repeatability, likely reflecting redundancy in the genetic routes that can lead to viviparity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Yusuf et al. 2023 source
The Discussion and Conclusions (pages unavailable) report no strong genome-wide signal of molecular convergence across the sampled transitions to viviparity, while also identifying a few repeatedly involved genes. That supports limited genetic repeatability in this system, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about complex traits over large timescales or show that redundant genetic routes explain the pattern. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationEastment et al. identified diverse molecular changes associated with viviparity, but only some were replicated, and even then only across a subset of lineages.
“In addition, they identified diverse molecular changes associated with viviparity, but only some of these genetic changes were replicated, and even then only across a subset of lineages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationAn increase in the number of copies of a genetic element can lead to increased expression levels, which in turn can produce a substantial change in a trait.
“For example, an increase in the number of copies of a genetic element can lead to increased expression levels, which in turn can produce a substantial change in a trait (Klure et al. 2025) (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Klure et al. 2025 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenThe second PhyloG2P approach focuses on phenotypic changes that have evolved independently in multiple lineages, known as replicated evolution.
“The second approach to PhyloG2P research focuses on phenotypic changes that have evolved independently in multiple lineages (known as replicated evolution, see Box 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenThe first PhyloG2P approach identifies phenotypes that have arisen only once in the evolutionary history of a group of lineages.
“The first approach identifies phenotypes that have arisen only once in the evolutionary history of a group of lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningTraits controlled by pleiotropically constrained networks are ideal for PhyloG2P research, as there is a greater chance that changes in the trait will have been caused by the same genetic change in multiple lineages, improving power to identify them.
“Traits controlled by pleiotropically constrained networks are ideal for PhyloG2P research, as there is a greater chance that changes in the trait will have been caused by the same genetic change in multiple lineages, improving our power to identify them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenPhyloG2P methods fall into three broad categories based on the type of genetic changes they identify: individual amino acid sites, changes in evolutionary rates, and duplication/loss of genetic elements.
“We argue that PhyloG2P methods fall into three broad categories based on the type of genetic changes they identify.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPhyloG2P methods use reconstructed evolutionary relationships to link genotypic variation between lineages to their variation in phenotype.
“PhyloG2P methods use reconstructed evolutionary relationships to link genotypic variation between lineages to their variation in phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2020 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationReplicated phenotypic changes in independent lineages can be caused by genetic changes which may be replicated at different levels of organization.
“Replicated phenotypic changes in independent lineages can be caused by genetic changes which may be replicated at different levels of organization (Fig. 2) (Losos 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Losos 2011 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisereasoningEither environmental redundancy or developmental side effect can lead to a decrease in selective pressure on the genetic elements controlling the trait, provided they are not pleiotropically linked to other traits.
“Either of these phenomena can lead to a decrease in selective pressure on the genetic elements controlling the trait, provided they are not pleiotropically linked to other traits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenTrait definition and measurement in PhyloG2P are constrained by data availability and sample size, and are further informed by prior knowledge of the genetic pathways associated with the trait.
“Practically, trait definition and measurement are constrained by data availability and sample size, and they are further informed by prior knowledge of the genetic pathways associated with the trait.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Trait definition and measurement are constrained by data availability and sample size.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenMost of the recently developed PhyloG2P methods identify correlations between replicated phenotypic transitions and replicated genetic changes.
“Most of the recently developed PhyloG2P methods identify correlations between replicated phenotypic transitions and replicated genetic changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationBoth PhyloG2P approaches facilitate mapping genotype to phenotype for traits that only vary between species, which is not possible with existing methods that depend upon the ability to cross individuals with contrasting phenotypes.
“Both of these approaches facilitate the mapping of genotype to phenotype for traits that only vary between species, which is not possible with existing methods that depend upon the ability to cross individuals with contrasting phenotypes (Smith et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2020 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationIn any group of lineages that have independently achieved similar phenotypic changes, some may have undergone similar or identical genetic changes, whereas others may have achieved the same phenotype through unique genetic changes.
“In any group of lineages that have independently achieved similar phenotypic changes, some of them may have undergone similar or identical genetic changes, where as others may have achieved the same phenotype through unique genetic changes (Yusuf et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yusuf et al. 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenDecreases in evolutionary rate can be associated with novel constraints on genetic elements, while increases in rate can be indicative of directional or relaxed selection.
“Decreases in rate can be associated with novel constraints on genetic elements, while increases in rate can be indicative of directional or relaxed selection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationnone givenPhyloG2P research follows two main approaches.
“PhyloG2P research follows two main approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThrough analysis of gene duplication and loss, Zhang et al. identified expansions of gene families related to hypoxia tolerance, which are likely required to survive in low oxygen alpine environments.
“Through analysis of gene duplication and loss, they identified expansions of gene families related to hypoxia tolerance, which are likely required to survive in low oxygen alpine environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningIt may be most appropriate to combine applications of ESL with other methods that use explicit models of evolution.
“As a result, it may be most appropriate to combine applications of ESL with other methods that use explicit models of evolution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe machine learning approach of ESL provides a first step into modeling a broader range of biological features that may impact phenotypes, and also provides a more computationally accessible option for PhyloG2P adjacent analysis.
“As such, the machine learning approach of ESL provides a first step into modeling a broader range of biological features that may impact phenotypes, and also provides a more computationally accessible option for PhyloG2P adjacent analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationComputational accessibility can also be provided through publicly available web applications.
“Computational accessibility can also be provided through publicly available web applications (Ribeiro et al. 2023; Dong et al. 2024; Morel et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ribeiro et al. 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Dong et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Morel et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThis combined approach may prove beneficial, as the more computationally intensive models will only need to be applied to the subset of genetic elements identified by the computationally efficient ESL, provided ESL is not overly inaccurate in its initial identification of candidate genetic elements.
“This approach may prove beneficial, as the more computationally intensive models will only need to be applied to the subset of genetic elements identified by the computationally efficient ESL (provided ESL is not overly inaccurate in its initial identification of candidate genetic elements) (Allard et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allard et al. 2025 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThe finding of gene family contraction in yolk-related genes highlights the potential for gene family contraction associated with trait loss and the importance of detailed understanding of trait variation in PhyloG2P studies.
“This finding highlights the potential for gene family contraction associated with trait loss, as well as the importance of having a detailed understanding of trait variation in PhyloG2P studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationGenes related to basic biological process were found to be under positive selection in Zhang et al.
“Genes related to basic biological process were found to be under positive selection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationOkuyama et al. chose CSUBST because the gene was highly conserved between species and they wanted to identify any identical substitutions driving the replicated phenotypic change.
“Okuyama et al. (2025) chose CSUBST because the gene was highly conserved between species and they wanted to identify any identical substitutions driving the replicated phenotypic change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Okuyama et al. 2025 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationEastment et al. found that replicated expansion and contraction of gene family size was the most widespread form of replication, although no family changed significantly in more than six lineages.
“They found that replicated expansion and contraction of gene family size was the most widespread form of replication, although no family changed significantly in more than six lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eastment et al. 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationTrait changes do not necessarily occur at the point of speciation, and models that assign whole branches as having a particular trait can cause erroneous inference of selective pressures.
“Another motivation for more complex models of selective pressure is that trait changes do not necessarily occur at the point of speciation. The models discussed above all implicitly make this assumption as they assign whole branches as having a particular trait, which can cause erroneous inference of the selective pressures acting on a genetic element (Halabi et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Halabi et al. 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationPCOC is available as a container and RERconverge is available as an R package.
“such as PCOC being available as a container (Rey et al. 2018) or RERconverge being available as an R package Kowalczyk et al. 2019”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningEnsuring that PhyloG2P methods are accessible will enhance the capacity for researchers to apply comprehensive sets of methods in their analyses, improving the capacity for PhyloG2P research to uncover novel genotype to phenotype maps.
“Ensuring that PhyloG2P methods are accessible will enhance the capacity for researchers to apply comprehensive sets of methods in their analyses, improving the capacity for PhyloG2P research to uncover novel genotype to phenotype maps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenA detailed understanding of both phenotypic and genotypic replication will reveal a largely untapped wealth of potential applications of these methods, further enabled by the development of PhyloG2P methods that can be applied to continuously valued traits.
“A detailed understanding of both phenotypic and genotypic replication will reveal a largely untapped wealth of potential applications of these methods, further enabled by the development of PhyloG2P methods that can be applied to continuously valued traits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningExtending PhyloG2P methods to account for within-lineage variance, such as by modeling changes in trait distributions, may improve their accuracy.
“Extending PhyloG2P methods to account for within-lineage variance, such as by modeling changes in trait distributions, may improve their accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenPhyloG2P methods identify a set of genetic elements correlated with a trait of interest, and follow-up studies are required to determine the nature of that relationship.
“PhyloG2P methods identify a set of genetic elements correlated with a trait of interest, and follow up studies are required to determine the nature of that relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationZhang et al. found plant immune response gene families had repeatedly contracted, potentially as a result of reduced microorganism presence.
“Additionally, they found plant immune response gene families had repeatedly contracted, potentially as a result of reduced microorganism presence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningWhile some challenges remain for the integration of epigenetic information and within population trait variation in these studies, recent developments provide promising approaches to addressing them.
“While some challenges remain for the integration of epigenetic information and within population trait variation in these studies, recent developments provide promising approaches to addressing them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationThis limitation restricts researchers' ability to apply PhyloG2P methods and inhibits the capacity for reproduction and verification of previous findings, eroding an important component of rigorous scientific research.
“This limitation not only restricts researchers’ ability to apply PhyloG2P methods, it also inhibits the capacity for reproduction and verification of previous findings, eroding an important component of rigorous scientific research (Kumar 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningFinding ways to include this information in PhyloG2P analysis may improve the capacity to identify genetic elements associated with trait variation between species.
“Finding ways to include this information in PhyloG2P analysis may improve the capacity to identify genetic elements associated with trait variation between species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenThere are many potential next steps that the PhyloG2P research program could take, and all of them are likely to reveal exciting new opportunities for expanding the mapping of genotype to phenotype.
“There are many potential next steps that the PhyloG2P research program could take, and all of them are likely to reveal exciting new opportunities for expanding the mapping of genotype to phenotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
InterpretationreasoningMethods lacking neat software implementation or basic documentation may prove inaccessible for researchers without the required background knowledge and skills, limiting their potential usage.
“Methods which lack neat software implementation or basic documentation may prove inaccessible for researchers without the required background knowledge and skills, limiting their potential usage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationIncluding variation in epigenetic and transcriptomic features can improve phenotype to genotype maps, and incorporating them into PhyloG2P analysis may prove fruitful.
“Including variation in these features can improve phenotype to genotype maps (Ritchie et al. 2015), and incorporating them into PhyloG2P analysis may prove fruitful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ritchie et al. 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenA model that unifies both population genetics and PhyloG2P analysis will pave the way for understanding the connection between evolution on short and long timescales.
“More broadly, a model that unifies both population genetics and PhyloG2P analysis will pave the way for understanding the connection between evolution on short and long timescales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationOne approach to including other forms of molecular variation is to use machine learning models, such as the Evolutionary Sparse Learning (ESL) model of Kumar and Sharma (2021).
“One approach to including these other forms of molecular variation is to use machine learning models, such as the Evolutionary Sparse Learning (ESL) model of Kumar and Sharma (2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kumar and Sharma 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationFollow-up investigations using RELAX and PCOC revealed the presence of both relaxed selection and a small number of replicated amino acid profile changes, likely due to the low abundance of pollinators.
“Follow up investigations using RELAX and PCOC revealed the presence of both relaxed selection and a small number of replicated amino acid profile changes, likely due to the low abundance of pollinators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenRecent years have seen many developments in the PhyloG2P research program.
“In summary, recent years have seen many developments in the PhyloG2P research program.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMost PhyloG2P methods rely on accurate ancestral state reconstruction, but most reconstruction methods assume neutral trait evolution, which can lead to inaccuracies when this assumption does not hold.
“A major caveat that applies to most PhyloG2P methods is that they rely, explicitly or implicitly, on accurate ancestral state reconstruction of the trait of interest to differentiate foreground and background lineages. However, most reconstruction methods assume that the trait of interest is evolving neutrally, which can lead to inaccuracies when this assumption does not hold (Holland et al. 2020”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Holland et al. 2020 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenThe PhyloG2P methods discussed in this review either focus on changes in molecular sequences, or gene duplication and loss.
“The PhyloG2P methods discussed in this review either focus on changes in molecular sequences, or gene duplication and loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationREforge performed better than rates-based methods at identifying regulatory elements associated with trait loss, but requires prior knowledge of transcription factors and their binding motifs.
“REforge was demonstrated to perform better at identifying regulatory elements associated with trait loss than methods based on evolutionary rates. However, it also requires prior knowledge of transcription factors and their binding motifs, which makes it challenging to apply REforge to traits that have not been studied previously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Langer et al. 2018 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningWith the growing abundance of genomic sequences, well-resolved phylogenies, and detailed trait databases, PhyloG2P methods are well positioned to expand genotype to phenotype mapping to include variation between species.
“With the growing abundance of genomic sequences, well-resolved phylogenies, and detailed trait databases, PhyloG2P methods are well positioned to expand genotype to phenotype mapping to include variation between species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationYan et al. 2023 found that tuning model complexity on a gene by gene basis reduced computation time while not impacting statistical performance.
“Yan et al. 2023 found that tuning model complexity on a gene by gene basis reduced computation time while no impacting statistical performance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yan et al. 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationcitationStudies using only a single PhyloG2P method limit the scope of conclusions they can draw and risk missing important genetic elements associated with the trait.
“Such studies limit the scope of the conclusions they can draw, and risk missing important genetic elements associated with the trait (Wheeler et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wheeler et al. 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
The paper relies on this without support.
Most lineages have a substantial number of unique phenotypic features.
“since most lineages will have a substantial number of unique phenotypic features”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is not always clear where the boundaries between parallel and convergent evolution lie.
“However, it is not always clear where the boundaries between these categories of close/similar and distant/distinct lie.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trait definition and measurement are constrained by data availability and sample size.
“Practically, trait definition and measurement are constrained by data availability and sample size”
The paper relies on this without support.
Viviparity has independently evolved many times in vertebrates such as squamate reptiles and fish, as well as once in mammals.
“Viviparity (giving birth to live young) has independently evolved many times in vertebrates such as squamate reptiles and fish, as well as once in mammals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Few previous studies had used genome-wide approaches to explore whether the same genes were involved in independent transitions to viviparity across deep evolutionary time scales.
“Few previous studies had used genome-wide approaches to explore whether the same genes were involved in independent transitions to viviparity across deep evolutionary time scales.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many lineages of angiosperm plants have independently adapted to harsh alpine environments.
“Many lineages of angiosperm plants have independently adapted to harsh alpine environments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most PhyloG2P studies use existing genetic annotations to verify the relevance of the candidate genetic elements they identify.
“Although infeasible for many species, most PhyloG2P studies use existing genetic annotations to verify the relevance of the candidate genetic elements they identify.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trait values can vary widely within lineages, and this variance will likely not be consistent through time or between lineages.
“Trait values can vary widely within lineages, and this variance will likely not be consistent through time or between lineages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Allelic variation between individuals may contribute to significantly different values of continuous traits.
“as allelic variation between individuals may contribute to significantly different values of the trait (such as height or lifespan)”
The paper relies on this without support.
High computational demands are common in genomic analysis.
“While high computational demands are common in genomic analysis”
The paper relies on this without support.
Machine learning does not explicitly model evolutionary processes.
“one shortcoming of using machine learning is that it does not explicitly model evolutionary processes”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
PAML substitution ratio is reversed between the table and text
MinorTable 1 describes PAML as comparing the ratio of synonymous to nonsynonymous substitutions, but the methods section defines its ω ratio as nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions. These are reciprocal ratios.
“PAML | Compares ratio of synonymous to nonsynonymous substitutions in foreground and background lineages (Yang 2007)”
“The branch model works by analyzing variation in the ratio of rates of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions in coding sequences (ω) between foreground and background branches of the phylogeny.”
Cited works that were retracted
Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.
Cites a retracted work: 10.1093/molbev/msac258
InfoThe cited work was retracted; the date of the notice is not on record.
Cited work 10.1093/molbev/msac258 · retraction date not known · this paper published 2025-09
“Mohammadi, 2022, Epistatic effects between amino acid insertions and substitutions mediate toxin resistance of vertebrate Na+, K+-ATPases, Mol Biol Evol, 39, msac258, 10.1093/molbev/msac258”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Mohammadi, S., Özdemir, H. İ., Özbek, P., Sumbul, F., Stiller, J., Deng, Y., Crawford, A. J., Rowland, H. M., Storz, J. F., Andolfatto, P., et al. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac258 · Cited by 13
RetractedPAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood
Yang, Z. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm088 · Cited by 13,879
Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies
Pollard, K. S., Hubisz, M. J., Rosenbloom, K. R., & Siepel, A. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.097857.109 · Cited by 2,353
Zhang, J. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi237 · Cited by 1,785
Yang, Z. (1998) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025957 · Cited by 1,446
Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions
Ritchie, M. D., Holzinger, E. R., Li, R., Pendergrass, S. A., & Kim, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3868 · Cited by 1,085
CAFE 5 models variation in evolutionary rates among gene families
Mendes, F. K., Vanderpool, D., Fulton, B., & Hahn, M. W. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1022 · Cited by 833
The genetic causes of convergent evolution
Stern, D. L. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3483 · Cited by 818
Smith, M. D., Wertheim, J. O., Weaver, S., Murrell, B., Scheffler, K., & Pond, S. L. K. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv022 · Cited by 792
RELAX: Detecting Relaxed Selection in a Phylogenetic Framework
Wertheim, J. O., Murrell, B., Smith, M. D., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., & Scheffler, K. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu400 · Cited by 778
Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation?
ARENDT, J., & Reznick, D. N. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.011 · Cited by 630
The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters
Maddison, W. P., & FitzJohn, R. G. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu070 · Cited by 468
Phylogenomics reveals three sources of adaptive variation during a rapid radiation
Pease, J. B., Haak, D. C., Hahn, M. W., & Moyle, L. C. (2016) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002379 · Cited by 432
Phylogenomics reveals multiple losses of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis
Griesmann, M., Chang, Y., Liu, X., Song, Y., Haberer, G., Crook, M. B., Billault-Penneteau, B., Lauressergues, D., Keller, J., Imanishi, L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat1743 · Cited by 429
Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection
Barghi, N., Hermisson, J., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0250-z · Cited by 425
Genome-wide signatures of convergent evolution in echolocating mammals
Parker, J., Tsagkogeorga, G., Cotton, J. A., Liu, Y., Provero, P., Stupka, E., & Rossiter, S. J. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12511 · Cited by 395
Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution
Castoe, T. A., de Koning, A. P. J., Kim, H., Gu, W., Noonan, B. P., Naylor, G. J. P., Jiang, Z. J., Parkinson, C. L., & Pollock, D. D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900233106 · Cited by 330
Evolutionary constraint and innovation across hundreds of placental mammals
Christmas, M. J., Kaplow, I. M., Genereux, D. P., Dong, M. X., Hughes, G. M., Li, X., Sullivan, P. F., Hindle, A. G., Andrews, G., Armstrong, J. C., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn3943 · Cited by 292
Convergent regulatory evolution and loss of flight in paleognathous birds
Sackton, T. B., Grayson, P., Cloutier, A., Hu, Z., Liu, J. S., Wheeler, N. E., Gardner, P. P., Clarke, J. A., Baker, A. J., Clamp, M., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7244 · Cited by 291
Parallel molecular evolution in an herbivore community
Zhen, Y., Aardema, M. L., Medina, E. M., Schumer, M., & Andolfatto, P. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226630 · Cited by 288
Incongruence in the phylogenomics era
Steenwyk, J. L., Li, Y., Zhou, X., Shen, X., & Rokas, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00620-x · Cited by 276
Detection of convergent and parallel evolution at the amino acid sequence level
Zhang, J., & Kumar, S. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025789 · Cited by 271
Lartillot, N., & Poujol, R. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq244 · Cited by 243
AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora
Falster, D. S., Gallagher, R. V., Wenk, E. H., Wright, I. J., Indiarto, D., Andrew, S. C., Baxter, C., Lawson, J., Allen, S. P., Fuchs, A., et al. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-01006-6 · Cited by 208
The importance of genetic redundancy in evolution
Láruson, Á. J., Yeaman, S., & Lotterhos, K. E. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.04.009 · Cited by 201
Gene tree discordance causes apparent substitution rate variation
Mendes, F. K., & Hahn, M. W. (2016) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syw018 · Cited by 189
Hundreds of genes experienced convergent shifts in selective pressure in marine mammals
Chikina, M., Robinson, J. D., & Clark, N. L. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw112 · Cited by 171
Latent homology and convergent regulatory evolution underlies the repeated emergence of yeasts
Nagy, L. G., Ohm, R. A., Kovács, G. M., Floudas, D., Riley, R. W., Gácser, A., Sipiczki, M., Davis, J. M., Doty, S., de Hoog, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5471 · Cited by 167
Phylogenetics is the new genetics (for most of biodiversity)
Smith, S. D., Pennell, M. W., Dunn, C. W., & Edwards, S. V. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2020.01.005 · Cited by 155
Zou, Z., & Zhang, J. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv091 · Cited by 153
RERconverge: an R package for associating evolutionary rates with convergent traits
Kowalczyk, A., Meyer, W. K., Partha, R., Mao, W., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz468 · Cited by 147
Hiller, M., Schaar, B. T., Indjeian, V. B., Kingsley, D. M., Hagey, L. R., & Bejerano, G. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · Cited by 144
Thomas, G. W. C., & Hahn, M. W. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv013 · Cited by 124
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods on Phylogenetic Networks with Reticulations
Bastide, P., Solís‐Lemus, C., Kriebel, R., Sparks, K. W., & Ané, C. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy033 · Cited by 107
Pan-mammalian analysis of molecular constraints underlying extended lifespan
Kowalczyk, A., Partha, R., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51089 · Cited by 95
Nagy, L. G., Riley, R., Bergmann, P. J., Krizsán, K., Martin, F. M., Grigoriev, I. V., Cullen, D., & Hibbett, D. S. (2017) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw238 · Cited by 90
Accurate detection of convergent amino-acid evolution with PCOC
Rey, C., Guéguen, L., Sémon, M., & Boussau, B. (2018) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msy114 · Cited by 82
Prudent, X., Parra, G., Schwede, P., Roscito, J. G., & Hiller, M. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw098 · Cited by 71
Bayesian Detection of Convergent Rate Changes of Conserved Noncoding Elements on Phylogenetic Trees
Hu, Z., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz049 · Cited by 69
Bat accelerated regions identify a bat forelimb specific enhancer in the HoxD locus
Booker, B. M., Friedrich, T., Mason, M. K., VanderMeer, J. E., Zhao, J., Eckalbar, W. L., Logan, M., Illing, N., Pollard, K. S., & Ahituv, N. (2016) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005738 · Cited by 66
Wheeler, L. C., Walker, J. F., Ng, J., Deanna, R., Dunbar-Wallis, A., Backes, A., Pezzi, P. H., Palchetti, M. V., Robertson, H. M., Monaghan, A., et al. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac044 · Cited by 63
Robust method for detecting convergent shifts in evolutionary rates
Partha, R., Kowalczyk, A., Clark, N. L., & Chikina, M. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz107 · Cited by 60
Accuracy of ancestral state reconstruction for non-neutral traits
Holland, B. R., Ketelaar-Jones, S., O’Mara, A. R., Woodhams, M. D., & Jordan, G. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64647-4 · Cited by 58
Self-citationFukushima, K., & Pollock, D. D. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01932-7 · Cited by 55
“Reverse genomics” predicts function of human conserved noncoding elements
Marcovitz, A., Jia, R., & Bejerano, G. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw001 · Cited by 53
Challenges and advances in measuring phenotypic convergence
Grossnickle, D. M., Brightly, W. H., Weaver, L. N., Stanchak, K. E., Roston, R. A., Pevsner, S. K., Stayton, C. T., Polly, P. D., & Law, C. J. (2024) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpae081 · Cited by 47
Convergent evolution of marine mammals is associated with distinct substitutions in common genes
Zhou, X., Seim, I., & Gladyshev, V. N. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16550 · Cited by 45
Lamichhaney, S., Card, D. C., Grayson, P., Tonini, J. F. R., Bravo, G. A., Näpflin, K., Termignoni-Garcia, F., Torres, C., Burbrink, F., Clarke, J. A., et al. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0248 · Cited by 44
Nagy, L. G., Merényi, Z., Hegedüs, B., & Bálint, B. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1241 · Cited by 43
The perils of intralocus recombination for inferences of molecular convergence
Mendes, F. K., Livera, A. P., & Hahn, M. W. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0244 · Cited by 42
O’Connor, T. D., & Mundy, N. I. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp231 · Cited by 41
Saputra, E., Kowalczyk, A., Cusick, L., Clark, N., & Chikina, M. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab068 · Cited by 41
Complementary evolution of coding and noncoding sequence underlies mammalian hairlessness
Kowalczyk, A. M., Chikina, M. D., & Clark, N. L. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76911 · Cited by 39
Schraiber, J. G., Edge, M. D., & Pennell, M. (2024) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002847 · Cited by 38
An integrated model of phenotypic trait changes and site-specific sequence evolution
Levy Karin, E., Wicke, S., Pupko, T., & Mayrose, I. (2017) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syx032 · Cited by 37
Embracing green computing in molecular phylogenetics
Kumar, S. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac043 · Cited by 37
An episodic burst of massive genomic rearrangements and the origin of non-marine annelids
Vargas-Chávez, C., Benítez-Álvarez, L., Martínez-Redondo, G. I., Álvarez-González, L., Salces-Ortiz, J., Eleftheriadi, K., Escudero, N., Guiglielmoni, N., Flot, J.-F., Novo, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-025-02728-1 · Cited by 35
Widespread cis-regulatory convergence between the extinct Tasmanian tiger and gray wolf
Feigin, C. Y., Newton, A. H., & Pask, A. J. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.244251.118 · Cited by 33
Xu, D., Yang, C., Shen, Q., Pan, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, T., Zhou, X., Lei, M., Chen, P., Yang, H., et al. (2021) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00517-6 · Cited by 33
Phenotypic Convergence Is Not Mirrored at the Protein Level in a Lizard Adaptive Radiation
Corbett-Detig, R. B., Russell, S. L., Nielsen, R., & Losos, J. B. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa028 · Cited by 30
Positive Selection and Enhancer Evolution Shaped Lifespan and Body Mass in Great Apes
Tejada-Martínez, D., Avelar, R. A., Lopes, I., Zhang, B., Novoa, G., de Magalhães, J. P., & Trizzino, M. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab369 · Cited by 28
Yan, H., Hu, Z., Thomas, G. W. C., Edwards, S. V., Sackton, T. B., & Liu, J. S. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad195 · Cited by 28
The effects of increasing the number of taxa on inferences of molecular convergence
Thomas, G. W. C., Hahn, M. W., & Hahn, Y. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw306 · Cited by 27
Detecting adaptive convergent amino acid evolution
Rey, C., Lanore, V., Veber, P., Guéguen, L., Lartillot, N., Sémon, M., & Boussau, B. (2019) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0234 · Cited by 26
Refining convergent rate analysis with topology in mammalian longevity and marine transitions
Treaster, S., Daane, J. M., & Harris, M. P. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab226 · Cited by 24
Dembech, E., Malatesta, M., Rito, C. D., Mori, G., Cavazzini, D., Secchi, A., Morandin, F., & Percudani, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218329120 · Cited by 23
Evolutionary sparse learning for phylogenomics
Kumar, S., & Sharma, S. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab227 · Cited by 22
Genomic signatures associated with transitions to viviparity in cyprinodontiformes
Yusuf, L. H., Saldívar Lemus, Y., Thorpe, P., Macías Garcia, C., & Ritchie, M. G. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad208 · Cited by 22
Convergence in hearing-related genes between echolocating birds and mammals
Sadanandan, K. R., Ko, M., Low, G. W., Gahr, M. L., Edwards, S. V., Hiller, M., Sackton, T. B., Rheindt, F. E., Sin, S. Y. W., & Baldwin, M. W. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2307340120 · Cited by 19
Parallel gene expansions drive rapid dietary adaptation in herbivorous woodrats
Klure, D. M., Greenhalgh, R., Orr, T. J., Shapiro, M. D., & Dearing, M. D. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adp7978 · Cited by 17
Convergent acquisition of disulfide-forming enzymes in malodorous flowers
Okuyama, Y., Fukushima, K., Kakishima, S., Valchanova, A. K., Takano, K. T., Ito-Inaba, Y., Nakazato, T., & Nagano, A. J. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adu8988 · Cited by 17
Distinct Genes with Similar Functions Underlie Convergent Evolution in Myotis Bat Ecomorphs
Morales, A. E., Burbrink, F. T., Segall, M., Meza, M. A., Munegowda, C., Webala, P. W., Patterson, B. D., Thong, V. D., Rüedi, M., Hiller, M., et al. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae165 · Cited by 16
Halabi, K., Karin, E. L., Guéguen, L., & Mayrose, I. (2021) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syaa087 · Cited by 15
Redlich, R., Kowalczyk, A., Tene, M., Sestili, H. H., Foley, K., Saputra, E., Clark, N., Chikina, M., Meyer, W. K., & Pfenning, A. R. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae210 · Cited by 14
CAAStools: a toolbox to identify and test Convergent Amino Acid Substitutions
Barteri, F., Valenzuela, A., Farré, X., Juan, D., Muntané, G., Esteve‐Altava, B., & Navarro, A. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad623 · Cited by 11
A phylogenetic method linking nucleotide substitution rates to rates of continuous trait evolution
Gemmell, P., Sackton, T. B., Edwards, S. V., & Liu, J. S. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011995 · Cited by 11
Evolutionary sparse learning reveals the shared genetic basis of convergent traits
Allard, J. B., Sharma, S., Patel, R., Sanderford, M., Tamura, K., Vucetic, S., Gerhard, G. S., & Kumar, S. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58428-8 · Cited by 11
Genomic signatures of convergent shifts to plunge-diving behavior in birds
Eliason, C. M., Mellenthin, L. E., Hains, T., McCullough, J. M., Pirro, S., Andersen, M. J., & Hackett, S. J. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05359-z · Cited by 10
Convergent evolution of noncoding elements associated with short tarsus length in birds
Shakya, S. B., Edwards, S. V., & Sackton, T. B. (2025) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02156-4 · Cited by 10
Testing phylogenetic signal with categorical traits and tree uncertainty
Ribeiro, D., Borges, R., Rocha, A. P., & Antunes, A. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad433 · Cited by 9
Convergent genomic signatures associated with vertebrate viviparity
Eastment, R. V., Wong, B. B. M., & McGee, M. D. (2024) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-01837-w · Cited by 9
Matsuda, Y., & Makino, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2024.1068 · Cited by 9
ERCnet: Phylogenomic Prediction of Interaction Networks in the Presence of Gene Duplication
Forsythe, E. S., Gatts, T. C., Lane, L. E., deRoux, C., Berggren, M., Rehmann, E. A., Zak, E. N., Bartel, T., L’Argent, L. A., & Sloan, D. B. (2025) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf089 · Cited by 9
Losos (2011) · doi:10.1111/evo.2011.65.issue-7 · Cited by 9
Langer, B. E., Roscito, J. G., & Hiller, M. (2018) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msy187 · Cited by 8
Yang, Y., & Jiang, X. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad215 · Cited by 7
Adaptive evolution of antioxidase-related genes in hypoxia-tolerant mammals
Wang, Q.-P., Luo, C.-Y., Xu, X.-H., Hu, W.-X., Gai, Y.-L., Gong, Y.-J., & Mu, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1315677 · Cited by 7
Genes underlying the evolution of tetrapod testes size
Baker, J., Meade, A., & Venditti, C. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01107-z · Cited by 6
Stefen, C., Wagner, F., Asztalos, M., Giere, P., Grobe, P., Hiller, M., Hofmann, R., Jähde, M., Lächele, U., Lehmann, T., et al. (2022) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00192-5 · Cited by 5
Thomas, G. W. C., Gemmell, P., Shakya, S. B., Hu, Z., Liu, J. S., Sackton, T. B., & Edwards, S. V. (2024) · Integrative And Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icae056 · Cited by 5
Pereira, A. G., & Kohlsdorf, T. (2023) · Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2022-0384 · Cited by 3
Convergent Anuran Middle Ear Loss Lacks a Universal, Adaptive Explanation
Womack, M. C., & Hoke, K. L. (2023) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000534936 · Cited by 3
Accurate detection of convergent mutations in large protein alignments with ConDor
Morel, M., Zhukova, A., Lemoine, F., & Gascuel, O. (2024) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evae040 · Cited by 3
Dong, Z., Wang, C., & Qu, Q. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae070 · Cited by 2
Womack (2018) · doi:10.1111/evo.2018.72.issue-3 · Cited by 2
Sykes (2022) · doi:10.1111/brv.v98.1
Sakamoto (2024) · doi:10.1002/ece3.v14.3
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cerca, 2023, Understanding natural selection and similarity: convergent, parallel and repeated evolution, Mol Ecol, 32, 5451, 10.1111/mec.v32.20 · DOI
- Chabrol, 2018, Detecting the molecular basis of phenotypic convergence, Methods Ecol Evol, 9, 2170, 10.1111/mee3.2018.9.issue-11 · DOI
- James, 2023, Replicated evolution in plants, Annu Rev Plant Biol, 74, 697, 10.1146/arplant.2023.74.issue-1 · DOI
- Speed, 2017, Quantification provides a conceptual basis for convergent evolution, Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 92, 815, 10.1111/brv.2017.92.issue-2 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy, Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 54, 1, 10.1146/ecolsys.2023.54.issue-1 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, Genomic convergence underlying high-altitude adaptation in alpine plants, J Integr Plant Biol, 65, 1620, 10.1111/jipb.v65.7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genetic foundations of convergent traits
Allard, J. B., & Kumar, S. (2026) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-026-00933-7 · Cited by 10
Cicconardi, F., McLellan, C. F., Séguret, A. C., McMillan, W. O., & Montgomery, S. H. (2025) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaf179 · Cited by 4
Integrating Intermediate Traits in Phylogenetic Genotype-to-Phenotype Studies
Clark, N. L., Hittinger, C. T., Li‐Byarlay, H., Rokas, A., Sackton, T. B., & Unckless, R. L. (2025) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icaf037 · Cited by 3
Berger, C. A., Stoilova, M. I., Varney, R., Abrams, S. C., Miglietta, M. P., Cartwright, P., & Oakley, T. H. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2616248123 · Cited by 1
Diet-Related Molecular Evolution Differs among Vertivores, Invertivores, and Combined CarnivoresPreprint
Tene, M., Seaver, A. W., Foley, K., & Meyer, W. K. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.30.697105
Metadata
- Authors
- Macdonald, A. R., James, M. E., Mitchell, J. D., & Holland, B. R.
- Affiliations
- School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania , Hobart, TS ,
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Venue
- Genome Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12410988
- OpenAlex
- W4414035720
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genome Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (CE200100015)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- genotype-phenotype mapping, character evolution, amino acid substitutions, evolutionary rate shifts, gene duplication, gene loss, trait measurement, intraspecific variation, phylogenetic comparative analysis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Genotype, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review