Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low intrinsic efficacy for G protein activation can explain the improved side effect profiles of new opioid agonists

Gillis, Alexander, Gondin, Arisbel B., Kliewer, Andrea, Sanchez, Julie, Lim, Herman D., Alamein, Claudia, Manandhar, Preeti, Santiago, Marina, Fritzwanker, Sebastian, Schmiedel, Frank, Katte, Timothy A., Reekie, Tristan, Grimsey, Natasha L., Kassiou, Michael, Kellam, Barrie, Krasel, Cornelius, Halls, Michelle L., Connor, Mark, Lane, J. Robert, Schulz, Stefan, Christie, Macdonald J., Canals, Meritxell·2020·Science Signaling

Abstract

Low intrinsic efficacy can explain the reduced side effects of apparently biased μ-opioid receptor agonists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scisignal.aaz3140

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. I. Masuho K. A. Martemyanov N. A. Lambert Monitoring G protein activation in cells with BRET in Methods in Molecular Biology (Springer New York 2015) vol. 1335 pp. 107–113. · DOI

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Gillis, A., Gondin, A. B., Kliewer, A., Sanchez, J., Lim, H. D., Alamein, C., Manandhar, P., Santiago, M., Fritzwanker, S., Schmiedel, F., Katte, T. A., Reekie, T., Grimsey, N. L., Kassiou, M., Kellam, B., Krasel, C., Halls, M. L., Connor, M., Lane, J. R., Schulz, S., Christie, M. J., & Canals, M.
Venue
Science Signaling
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
13
Issue
625
ISSN
  • 1945-0877
  • 1937-9145
Cited by
336
References
72
Language
en
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1121029, 1072113)
  • Auckland Medical Research Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.