Cited by 292Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingDermatology and Skin DiseasesAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Quorum sensing between bacterial species on the skin protects against epidermal injury in atopic dermatitis

Open access
Williams, Michael R., Costa, Stephen K., Zaramela, Livia S., Khalil, Shadi, Todd, Daniel A., Winter, Heather L., Sanford, James A., O’Neill, Alan M. +7 more·2019·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Quorum sensing peptides produced by commensal skin staphylococci protect against skin injury and inflammation induced by Staphylococcus aureus toxins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat8329

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The skin microbiome is regulated by quorum-sensing mechanisms between bacterial strains and by crosstalk between bacteria and the skin innate immune system and epidermal Langerhans cells that continuously educate the adaptive immune system.

    “The skin microbiome is regulated on one hand by the quorum-sensing mechanisms between bacterial strains26 and on the other hand by the crosstalk between the bacteria and the skin innate immune system and epidermal Langerhans cells continuously educating the adaptive immune system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, M. R., Costa, S. K., Zaramela, L. S., Khalil, S., Todd, D. A., Winter, H. L., Sanford, J. A., O’Neill, A. M., Liggins, M. C., Nakatsuji, T., Cech, N. B., Cheung, A. L., Zengler, K., Horswill, A. R., & Gallo, R. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Gallo, Richard L.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2019-05
Volume
11
Issue
490
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2943169224
Cited by
292
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 16
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AI116576,, R01AR064781, U19 AI117673, R01AR064781-04S1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
quorum sensing, Staphylococcus aureus toxin, epidermal damage, atopic dermatitis, skin inflammation, bacterial peptides, skin microbiome, host defense
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Bacterial Toxins, Coagulase, Dermatitis, Atopic, Epidermis, Homeostasis, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Staphylococcus, Keratinocytes, Quorum Sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review