Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Endosomal recycling reconciles the Alzheimer's disease paradox

Small, Scott A., Petsko, Gregory A.·2020·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

A hub-and-spoke model with endosomal recycling as the hub can reconcile the pathogenic contribution of amyloid precursor protein to Alzheimer’s disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1717

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Documenting that neuronal pathologies were resistant to knocking out tau supports the hypothesis that AD's neuronal and microglia pathology might occur independent of, and in parallel to, tau pathology.

    “Furthermore, documenting that the neuronal pathologies were resistant to knocking out tau supports the hypothesis that AD’s neuronal and microglia pathology might occur independent of, and in parallel to, tau pathology (Small and Petsko, 2020).”
  • Retromer defects in sporadic Alzheimer's disease can occur independent of, and upstream to, either amyloid or tau pathology.

    “recent studies suggest that retromer defects in sporadic AD can occur independent of, and upstream, to either amyloid or tau pathology (Small and Petsko, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1093/brain/awz142 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107719 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.010 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41380-019-0364-x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.031 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.020 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/s41418-019-0487-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba6334 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3621-17.2018 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Small, S. A., & Petsko, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
  • Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2020-12-02
Volume
12
Issue
572
ISSN
  • 1946-6234
  • 1946-6242
Cited by
60
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review