Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tau and other proteins found in Alzheimer’s disease spinal fluid are linked to retromer-mediated endosomal traffic in mice and humans

Simoes, Sabrina, Neufeld, Jessica L., Triana-Baltzer, Gallen, Moughadam, Setareh, Chen, Emily I., Kothiya, Milankumar, Qureshi, Yasir H., Patel, Vivek, Honig, Lawrence S., Kolb, Hartmuth, Small, Scott A.·2020·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

Endosomal secreted proteins can be detected in the CSF and inform on how Alzheimer’s defective trafficking pathway can contribute to disease spread.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba6334

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VPS35 deficiency leads to a similar increase in APP-related proteins APLP1 and APLP2 at the cell surface, which are thought to be processed by secretases in the same way as APP.

    “As has been shown previously, VPS35 deficiency also leads to a similar increase in APP-related proteins APLP1 and APLP2 at the cell surface, which are thought to be processed by secretases in the same way as APP [79,93,141].”

    From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Results section on CSF proteins in Vps35 knockout mice (page unavailable) reports elevated APLP1, APLP2, and APP fragments and identifies all three as BACE1 substrates. The Discussion (page unavailable) says BACE1 cleaves them at endosomal membranes. The paper does not show that APLP1 or APLP2 increases at the cell surface, so the claimed location is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At 3 months of age, VPS35 nsKO mice have no cell or synaptic loss.

    “an age when previous studies have established that there is no cell or synaptic loss in these mice (Simoes et al., 2020).”

    From The neuronal retromer can regulate both neuronal and microglial phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as Simoes et al., 2020

    The Results section (“Validating BACE1 substrates and Tau accumulation in mouse CSF”; page not provided) reports no signs of neuronal loss in the hippocampus of 3-month-old Vps35 cKO mice and unchanged pre- and postsynaptic marker expression. The Methods identify these as neuronal-selective knockout mice, but unchanged marker expression does not directly establish that no synapses were lost, and the neuronal-loss assessment was limited to the hippocampus. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a previous CSF proteomic screen, elevation in CSF tau was the most reliable effect in VPS35 nsKO mice.

    “in a recent study (Simoes et al., 2020), where we used CSF proteomics to essentially establish the secretome of the VPS35 nsKO mice, an elevation in CSF tau was the most reliable effect.”

    From The neuronal retromer can regulate both neuronal and microglial phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as Simoes et al., 2020

    The Results section, “Validating BACE1 substrates and Tau accumulation in mouse CSF” (page unavailable), reports replicated elevations of CSF tau in Vps35 cKO mice. The Introduction (page unavailable) calls tau one of three reliable findings validated from the CSF proteomic screen, but does not rank it as the most reliable effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies have established a CSF biomarker of retromer-dependent neuronal dysfunction.

    “recent studies have established a CSF biomarker of retromer-dependent neuronal dysfunction (Simoes et al., 2020).”

    From The neuronal retromer can regulate both neuronal and microglial phenotypes of Alzheimer's disease (2022) · cites this paper as Simoes et al., 2020

    The Discussion identifies a joint increase in CSF tau with n-APLP1 or n-CHL1 as a potential biomarker of impaired retromer-dependent trafficking. But it says such a biomarker 'can be developed,' not that one has been established; the Discussion also notes that precise diagnostic cutoffs could not yet be established. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Retromer deficiency or dysregulation has been observed in AD brain and can perturb APOE levels; neuronal Vps35 deletion can elevate APOE in mouse CSF and hippocampus, likely through glial activation.

    “Retromer deficiency or dysregulation which has been observed in AD brain (Small, Kent et al. 2005) can also perturb APOE levels, for example neuronal Vps35 deletion can elevate APOE in mouse CSF (Simoes, Neufeld et al. 2020) as well as hippocampus, likely through glial activation observed with neuronal Vps35 deletion (Qureshi, Berman et al. 2022).”

    From SORLA up-regulation suppresses pathological effects in aged tauopathy mouse brain (2026) · cites this paper as Simoes, Neufeld et al. 2020

    The citation to Simoes et al. is attached to the claim that neuronal Vps35 deletion elevates APOE in mouse CSF. The Results describe a CSF proteomic screen in neuronal-selective Vps35 knockout mice, but the reported elevations concern proteins including APLP1, CHL1, and tau; searches for APOE and apolipoprotein E found no passage reporting an APOE increase. The hippocampal and glial-activation claims are attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.056 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.078 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.035 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.tins.2017.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/nrn3896 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/ng1943 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/ana.24305 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s00401-016-1566-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/ana.20667 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/mp.2015.100 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.04.020 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nchembio.1508 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.01.031 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/tra.12451 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64538-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/s41591-020-0781-z · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1186/s13195-020-00596-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1126/science.286.5440.735 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1074/mcp.M114.041533 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1242/bio.20122451 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00401-018-1948-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.05.021 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.M112.380642 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/srep05715 · DOI
  30. 10.3233/JAD-2011-110161 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nbt.1641 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.010 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/nan.12378 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006446 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/sj.mp.4000552 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/emmm.200900026 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01332.x · DOI
  39. J. Tüshaus, S. A. Müller, E. S. Kataka, J. Zaucha, L. S. Monasor, M. Su, G. Güner, G. Jocher, S. Tahirovic, D. Frishman, M. Simons, S. F. Lichtenthaler, Quantitative secretome analysis establishes the cell type-resolved mouse brain secretome. bioRxiv 2020.05.22.110023 , (2020).
  40. 10.1111/acel.12692 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.15252/embj.201899084 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031302 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.12.017 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.07.010 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.12.025 · DOI
  46. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256043.50901.e3 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.3233/JAD-200463 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Simoes, S., Neufeld, J. L., Triana-Baltzer, G., Moughadam, S., Chen, E. I., Kothiya, M., Qureshi, Y. H., Patel, V., Honig, L. S., Kolb, H., & Small, S. A.
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2020-11-25
Volume
12
Issue
571
ISSN
  • 1946-6234
  • 1946-6242
Cited by
51
References
12
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AG034618, R01AG035015, P50AG008702)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review