Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Miniature Inverted‐Repeat Transposable Elements and Their Relationship to Established DNA Transposons

Feschotte, Cédric, Zhang, Xiaoyu, Wessler, Susan R.·2007·Mobile DNA II

Abstract

With the advent of genome sequencing projects, vast amounts of DNA sequence, from a wide variety of plant and animal species, have become available for analysis. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), with their high copy number, distinct structural features (target site duplications [TSDs] and terminal inverted repeats [TIRs]), and compact stature, are relatively easy to mine from DNA sequence databases. Comparison of the transposase-encoding Tc elements and the numerous MITE families suggested possible scenarios for the origin of MITEs in Caenorhabditis elegans . Several groups independently discovered an abundant family of short (80-bp) palindromic elements, called Mrs or Made1 . The TIRs are 80 to 100% similar to those of mariner -like elements (MLEs) that are dispersed in the genome. These were the first MLEs identified in mammals and were subsequently grouped into the Hsmar1 family. Plant MITEs related to pogo -like transposons have only been identified in Arabidopsis . Phylogenetic analyses of over 100 plant MLE transposase sequences revealed the existence of multiple and divergent lineages of MLE transposases. Together these results provide an explanation for the proliferation, diversity, and success of Stowaway MITEs in plant genomes. P instability factor (PIF) is an active DNA element family first discovered as multiple mutagenic insertions into the maize R gene. Several MITE families described from plants, animals, and fungi do not share any struc…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/9781555817954.ch50

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00567.x · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00121360 · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1365-2583.1999.00144.x · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8524 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1411 · DOI
  6. 10.1105/tpc.6.6.907 · DOI
  7. 10.1105/tpc.4.10.1283 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-94-011-4898-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00267.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1999.00469.x · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3431 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/19.8.1871 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.091095498 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90016-8 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026351 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00187-6 · DOI
  17. Feschotte C., Mariner -like transposases are widespread and diverse in flowering plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  18. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00048.x · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/15.12.4737 · DOI
  20. 10.1146/annurev.genet.31.1.337 · DOI
  21. Hsia A. P., 1996, DNA sequence analyses support the role of interrupted gap repair in the origin of internal deletions of the maize transposon, MuDR, Genetics, 142, 603, 10.1093/genetics/142.2.603 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s002940050537 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/12.12.4921 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00571-X · DOI
  25. 10.1007/PL00006440 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/genetics/149.3.1569 · DOI
  27. 10.1105/tpc.13.11.2553 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02093-X · DOI
  29. 10.1023/A:1004030922447 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.151269298 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1081 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7376 · DOI
  33. Lepetit D., 2000, Glider and Vision: two new families of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Xenopus laevis genome, Genetica, 108, 163, 10.1023/A:1004173315419 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00121-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1101/gr.10.7.982 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/genetics/117.1.117 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026259 · DOI
  38. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0593 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/nar/18.19.5781 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/378672a0 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Oosumi T., 1995, Identification of putative nonautonomous transposable elements associated with several transposon families in Caenorhabditis elegans, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 8886, 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8886 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BF02352294 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00007-8 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/nar/25.20.4048 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF00041410 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00472-1 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6294 · DOI
  48. Schlubiger J.‐L., 1985, The Vi element. A transposon‐like repeated DNA sequence interspersed in the vitellogenin locus of Xenopus laevis, J. Mol. Biol., 186, 491
  49. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026267 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0959-437X(99)00031-3 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1073/pnas.93.4.1443 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1007/s004380050755 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/PL00006512 · DOI
  54. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.245 · DOI
  55. Tarchini R., 2000, The complete sequence of 340 kb of DNA around the rice Adh1‐adh2 region reveals interrupted colinearity with maize chromosome 4, Plant Cell, 12, 381
  56. 10.1073/pnas.98.4.1699 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026415 · DOI
  58. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7475 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003871 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/BF00299145 · DOI
  61. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2001.00945.x · DOI
  62. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0262 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/genetics/146.2.681 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/0959-437X(95)80016-X · DOI
  65. 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1733 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/BF00425826 · DOI
  67. 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1160 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1073/pnas.211442198 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 116

Metadata

Authors
Feschotte, C., Zhang, X., & Wessler, S. R.
Venue
Mobile DNA II
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-12
Pages
1145-1158
Cited by
116
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review