The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fusarium and Candida albicans Biofilms on Soft Contact Lenses: Model Development, Influence of Lens Type, and Susceptibility to Lens Care Solutions
Open accessAbstract
Fungal keratitis is commonly caused by Fusarium species and less commonly by Candida species. Recent outbreaks of Fusarium keratitis were associated with contact lens wear and with ReNu with MoistureLoc contact lens care solution, and biofilm formation on contact lens/lens cases was proposed to play a role in this outbreak. However, no in vitro model for contact lens-associated fungal biofilm has been developed. In this study, we developed and characterized in vitro models of biofilm formation on various soft contact lenses using three species of Fusarium and Candida albicans. The contact lenses tested were etafilcon A, galyfilcon A, lotrafilcon A, balafilcon A, alphafilcon A, and polymacon. Our results showed that clinical isolates of Fusarium and C. albicans formed biofilms on all types of lenses tested and that the biofilm architecture varied with the lens type. Moreover, differences in hyphal content and architecture were found between the biofilms formed by these fungi. We also found that two recently isolated keratitis-associated fusaria formed robust biofilms, while the reference ATCC 36031 strain (recommended by the International Organization for Standardization guidelines for testing of disinfectants) failed to form biofilm. Furthermore, using the developed in vitro biofilm model, we showed that phylogenetically diverse planktonic fusaria and Candida were susceptible to MoistureLoc and MultiPlus. However,Fusarium biofilms exhibited reduced susceptibility against these solutions in a species- and time-dependent manner. This in vitro model should provide a better understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of lens-related fungal keratitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chandra, J., Kuhn, D. M., Mukherjee, P. K., Hoyer, L. L., McCormick, T., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2001) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.183.18.5385-5394.2001 · Cited by 1,578
Self-citationMultistate Outbreak of Fusarium Keratitis Associated With Use of a Contact Lens Solution
Chang, D. C., Grant, G. B., O’Donnell, K., Wannemuehler, K. A., Noble-Wang, J., Rao, C. Y., Jacobson, L. M., Crowell, C. S., Sneed, R. S., Lewis, F. M. T., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.8.953 · Cited by 600
Self-citationBiofilm formation by Candida species on the surface of catheter materials in vitro
Hawser, S. P., & Douglas, L. J. (1994) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.62.3.915-921.1994 · Cited by 599
Role for Cell Density in Antifungal Drug Resistance in Candida albicans Biofilms
Perumal, P., Mekala, S., & Chaffin, W. L. (2007) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.01237-06 · Cited by 165
Khot, P. D., Suci, P. A., Miller, R. L., Nelson, R. D., & Tyler, B. J. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00997-06 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Epidemiology of Invasive Mycoses in North America
Pfaller, M. A., & Diekema, D. J. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408410903241444 · Cited by 901
Luangsa-ard, J., Houbraken, J., van Doorn, T., Hong, S.-B., Borman, A. M., Hywel-Jones, N. L., & Samson, R. A. (2011) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02322.x · Cited by 371
Lipner, S. R., & Scher, R. K. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.062 · Cited by 345
Candida Species: New Insights into Biofilm Formation
Cuéllar-Cruz, M., López-Romero, E., Villagómez-Castro, J. C., & Ruiz-Baca, E. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.48 · Cited by 80
Keratitis-Associated Fungi Form Biofilms with Reduced Antifungal Drug Susceptibility
Zhang, X., Sun, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Hou, W. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10810 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Imamura, Y., Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P. K., Lattif, A. A., Szczotka-Flynn, L. B., Pearlman, E., Lass, J. H., O'Donnell, K., & Ghannoum, M. A.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 171-182
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2144386074
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fusarium and Candida albicans Biofilms on Soft Contact Lenses: Model Development, Influence of Lens Type, and Susceptibility to Lens Care Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.00387-07
- The paper
- Imamura, Y., Chandra, J., Mukherjee, P. K., Lattif, A. A., Szczotka-Flynn, L. B., Pearlman, E., Lass, J. H., O'Donnell, K., & Ghannoum, M. A. (2008). Fusarium and Candida albicans Biofilms on Soft Contact Lenses: Model Development, Influence of Lens Type, and Susceptibility to Lens Care Solutions. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00387-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.