The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Antibacterial Properties of Pexiganan, an Analog of Magainin
Open accessAbstract
Pexiganan, a 22-amino-acid antimicrobial peptide, is an analog of the magainin peptides isolated from the skin of the African clawed frog. Pexiganan exhibited in vitro broad-spectrum antibacterial activity when it was tested against 3,109 clinical isolates of gram-positive and gram-negative, anaerobic and aerobic bacteria. The pexiganan MIC at which 90% of isolates are inhibited (MIC 90 ) was 32 μg/ml or less for Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus faecium , Corynebacterium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., certain species of the family Enterobacteriaceae , Bacteroides spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., and Propionibacterium spp. Comparison of the MICs and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of pexiganan for 143 isolates representing 32 species demonstrated that for 92% of the isolates tested, MBCs were the same or within 1 twofold difference of the MICs, consistent with a bactericidal mechanism of action. Killing curve analysis showed that pexiganan killed Pseudomonas aeruginosa rapidly, with 10 6 organisms/ml eliminated within 20 min of treatment with 16 μg of pexiganan per ml. No evidence of cross-resistance to a number of other antibiotic classes was observed, as determined by the equivalence of the MIC 50 s and the MIC 90 s of pexiganan for strains resistant to oxacillin, cefazolin, cefoxitin, imipenem, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and clindamicin versus those for strains susceptible to these antimicrobial agents. Attempts to generate resistance in several bacterial species through repeated passage with subinhibitory concentrations of pexiganan were unsuccessful. In conclusion, pexiganan exhibits properties in vitro which make it an attractive candidate for development as a topical antimicrobial agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Self-citationJenssen, H., Hamill, P., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00056-05 · Cited by 2,518
Amphipathic, α-helical antimicrobial peptides
Tossi, A., Sandri, L., & Giangaspero, A. (2000) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/1097-0282(2000)55:1<4::aid-bip30>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 1,247
Kumar, P., Kizhakkedathu, J., & Straus, S. (2018) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom8010004 · Cited by 1,227
A Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential as Anti-Infective Drugs
Gordon, Y. J., Romanowski, E. G., & McDermott, A. M. (2005) · Current Eye Research · doi:10.1080/02713680590968637 · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Ge, Y., MacDonald, D. L., Holroyd, K. J., Thornsberry, C., Wexler, H., & Zasloff, M.
- Venue
- Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 782-788
- ISSN
- 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-6596
- OpenAlex
- W2134886671
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Antibacterial Properties of Pexiganan, an Analog of Magainin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aac.43.4.782
- The paper
- Ge, Y., MacDonald, D. L., Holroyd, K. J., Thornsberry, C., Wexler, H., & Zasloff, M. (1999). In Vitro Antibacterial Properties of Pexiganan, an Analog of Magainin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.43.4.782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.