Cited by 122Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFungal Infections and Studies

Antifungal Activity of Amphotericin B Cochleates against Candida albicans Infection in a Mouse Model

Open access
Zarif, Leila, Graybill, John R., Perlin, David, Najvar, Laura, Bocanegra, Rosie, Mannino, Raphael J.·2000·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Cochleates are lipid-based supramolecular assemblies composed of natural products, negatively charged phospholipid, and a divalent cation. Cochleates can encapsulate amphotericin B (AmB), an important antifungal drug. AmB cochleates (CAMB) have a unique shape and the ability to target AmB to fungi. The minimal inhibitory concentration and the minimum lethal concentration against Candida albicans are similar to that for desoxycholate AmB (DAMB; Fungizone). In vitro, CAMB induced no hemolysis of human red blood cells at concentrations of as high as 500 microg of AmB/ml, and DAMB was highly hemolytic at 10 microg of AmB/ml. CAMB protect ICR mice infected with C. albicans when the agent is administered intraperitoneally at doses of as low as 0.1 mg/kg/day. In a tissue burden study, CAMB, DAMB, and AmBisome (liposomal AmB; LAMB) were effective in the kidneys, but in the spleen CAMB was more potent than DAMB at 1 mg/kg/day and was equivalent to LAMB at 10 mg/kg/day. In summary, CAMB are highly effective in treating murine candidiasis and compare well with AmBisome and AmB.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.44.6.1463-1469.2000

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Bangham A, Pethica B A. The adhesiveness of cells and the nature of the chemical groups at their surfaces. Proc R Phys Soc Edinburg. 1959;28:43–52. [Google Scholar]
  2. [9]Kucers A, Bennet N M. Amphotericin B. In: Kucers A, Bennett N M, editors. The use of antibiotics. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: J. B. Lippincott; 1987. pp. 1441–1447. [Google Scholar]
  3. [10]Mannino R J, Gould-Fogerite S. Antigen cochleate formulations for oral and systemic vaccination. In: Levine M M, editor. New generation vaccines. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker; 1997. pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. [12]Pace S, Riess J G, Zarif L. Protective effect, against hemolysis, of perfluoroalkylated chains in surfactants. Artif Organs. 1990;14:201–204. [Google Scholar]
  5. [21]Zarif L, Mannino R J. Cochleates: lipid-based vehicles for gene delivery—concept, achievements and future development. In: Habib N, editor. Cancer gene therapy: past achievements and future challenges—2000. London, England: Plenum Publishing Company; 2000. pp. 83–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zarif, L., Graybill, J. R., Perlin, D., Najvar, L., Bocanegra, R., & Mannino, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • <!--label omitted: 3-->Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York 100163
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2000-06
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1463-1469
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2141746397
Cited by
122
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (1-A1-025141)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, antifungal activity, liposomal amphotericin B, hemolysis, tissue distribution, drug delivery
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Humans, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review