Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 751

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research

Open access
Walter, Jens·2008·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Bacteria belonging to the genus Lactobacillus are members of the lactic acid bacteria (LAB), a broadly defined group characterized by the formation of lactic acid as the sole or main end product of carbohydrate metabolism. They can be found in plants or material of plant origin, silage, fermented food (yogurt, cheese, olives, pickles, salami, etc.), as well as in the oral cavities, gastrointestinal tracts (GIT), and vaginas of humans and animals (31). In particular, the Lactobacillus species found in the GIT have received tremendous attention due to their health-promoting properties. They are commonly used as probiotics, which are defined by the FAO/WHO as live microorganisms that when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host. The economic success and exciting prospects of probiotic products have accelerated research on intestinal lactobacilli. Genomics of Lactobacillus species is booming, and the genomes of five strains that belong to species commonly found in human fecal samples have recently been sequenced (50). Several comparative and functional genomic investigations have been conducted to gain information about the functionality of lactobacilli in the GIT (69). Unfortunately, a major misconception regarding the ecological role of lactobacilli in the intestinal tract has been embraced by many scientists working in the field. Specifically, there has been a general and persistent assumption that a large number of Lactobacillus species form stable and numerically significant populations in the human intestinal tract, especially in the small intestine, where they are presumed to form epithelial associations (101). Considering how widespread and accepted this perception is, there is surprisingly little experimental evidence that supports it. Ecological observations for the prevalence and dynamics of fecal Lactobacillus populations and the findings obtained with comparative genomics do indicate now that the ecological role of most types of intestinal lactobacilli, and their relationship with the human host, should be reconsidered. In this review, evidence is summarized that suggests that only a small number of Lactobacillus species are true inhabitants of the mammalian intestinal tract and that most lactobacilli present are allochthonous members derived from fermented food, the oral cavity, or more proximal parts of the GIT. It is further explained why this knowledge provides information valuable for selecting strains for fundamental research of the ecological role of lactobacilli in the GIT, for their use as probiotics in foods and supplements, and for pharmaceutical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.00753-08

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 751

Metadata

Authors
Walter, J.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2008-08-15
Volume
74
Issue
16
Pages
4985-4996
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2097808005
Cited by
751
References
7
FWCI
27.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00753-08
The paper
Walter, J. (2008). Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00753-08

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.