Cited by 61Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAlgal biology and biofuel productionBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology

Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Freshwater and Brackish-Water Strains of Microcystis Aeruginosa Acclimated to a Salinity Gradient: Insight into Salt Tolerance

Open access
Georges des Aulnois, Maxime, Roux, Pauline, Caruana, Amandine, Réveillon, Damien, Briand, Enora, Hervé, Fabienne, Savar, Véronique, Bormans, Myriam +1 more·2019·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Blooms of Microcystis aeruginosa and the production of microcystins are major issues in eutrophic freshwater bodies. Recently, an increasing number of proliferations of M. aeruginosa in brackish water has been documented. The occurrence of both M. aeruginosa and microcystins in coastal areas represents a new threat for human and environmental health. In order to better describe the mechanisms involved in Microcystis sp. proliferation in brackish water, this study used two M. aeruginosa strains isolated from fresh and brackish waters. High salinity reduced the growth rate and microcystin production rate of M. aeruginosa . In order to cope with higher salinities, the strains accumulated different cyanobacterial compatible solutes, as well as unsaturated lipids, explaining their distinct salt tolerance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.01614-19

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AquaPen-C 100 enables rapid measurements of photosynthetic parameters under both field and laboratory conditions.

    “More compact and portable devices include the AquaPen-C 100 from Photon Systems Instruments (PSI) (Drásov, Czech Republic), which enables rapid measurements of photosynthetic parameters under both field and laboratory conditions [213].”

    From Multi-Sensing Monitoring of the Microalgae Biomass Cultivation Systems for Biofuels and Added Value Products Synthesis—Challenges and Opportunities (2025) · cites this paper as [213]

    The Materials and Methods section (page not available) identifies the AquaPen-C 100 from Photon Systems Instruments and says it was used to measure a photosynthetic parameter, the maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II, in cultured samples. It does not establish that the device is compact or portable, that measurements are rapid, or that it can be used under field conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [26]26. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2000. Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
  2. [65]65. Le Bail A, Charrier B. 2013. Plant organogenesis. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ.
  3. [68]68. Wood AM, Everroad RC, Wingard LM. 2005. Measuring growth rates in microalgal cultures, p 269-285. In Anderson RA (ed), Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Cited by

Authors
Georges des Aulnois, M., Roux, P., Caruana, A., Réveillon, D., Briand, E., Hervé, F., Savar, V., Bormans, M., & Amzil, Z.
Affiliations
  • Phycotoxins Laboratory, Ifremer, Nantes, France
  • Ifremer (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2019-11
Volume
85
Issue
21
Pages
19
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2969547006
Cited by
61
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Keywords
Microcystis aeruginosa, salt tolerance, salinity gradient, brackish water, freshwater cyanobacteria, microcystin production, cyanobacterial growth rate, osmolytes, unsaturated lipids, osmotic stress, cyanobacterial blooms
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Saline Waters, Bacterial Toxins, Fresh Water, Osmotic Pressure, Sucrose, Trehalose, Water Microbiology, Microcystis, Microcystins, Salinity, Salt Tolerance, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review