The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria Resistant to Metallic Copper Surfaces
Open accessAbstract
Metallic copper alloys have recently attracted attention as a new antimicrobial weapon for areas where surface hygiene is paramount. Currently it is not understood on a molecular level how metallic copper kills microbes, but previous studies have demonstrated that a wide variety of bacteria, including Escherichia coli , Staphylococcus aureus , and Clostridium difficile , are inactivated within minutes or a few hours of exposure. In this study, we show that bacteria isolated from copper alloy coins comprise strains that are especially resistant against the toxic properties exerted by dry metallic copper surfaces. The most resistant of 294 isolates were Gram-positive staphylococci and micrococci, Kocuria palustris , and Brachybacterium conglomeratum but also included the proteobacterial species Sphingomonas panni and Pseudomonas oleovorans . Cells of some of these bacterial strains survived on copper surfaces for 48 h or more. Remarkably, when these dry-surface-resistant strains were exposed to moist copper surfaces, resistance levels were close to those of control strains and MICs for copper ions were at or below control strain levels. This suggests that mechanisms conferring resistance against dry metallic copper surfaces in these newly isolated bacterial strains are different from well-characterized copper ion detoxification systems. Furthermore, staphylococci on coins did not exhibit increased levels of resistance to antibiotics, arguing against coselection with copper surface resistance traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Noyce, J. O., Michels, H., & Keevil, C. W. (2006) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.008 · Cited by 403
Intracellular Copper Does Not Catalyze the Formation of Oxidative DNA Damage in Escherichia coli
Macomber, L., Rensing, C., & Imlay, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01357-06 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface
Grass, G., Rensing, C., & Solioz, M. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02766-10 · Cited by 1,640
Self-citationAntimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications
Mitra, D., Kang, E.-T., & Neoh, K. G. (2020) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17815 · Cited by 322
Antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces kill Staphylococcus haemolyticus via membrane damage
Santo, C. E., Quaranta, D., & Grass, G. (2012) · MicrobiologyOpen · doi:10.1002/mbo3.2 · Cited by 195
Self-citationGrossoehme, N., Kehl-Fie, T. E., Ma, Z., Adams, K. W., Cowart, D. M., Scott, R. A., Skaar, E. P., & Giedroc, D. P. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.220012 · Cited by 101
Using Copper to Fight Microorganisms
Borkow, G. (2012) · Current Chemical Biology · doi:10.2174/187231312801254723 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Espírito Santo, C., Morais, P. V., & Grass, G.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1341-1348
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2119998263
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria Resistant to Metallic Copper Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.01952-09
- The paper
- Espírito Santo, C., Morais, P. V., & Grass, G. (2010). Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria Resistant to Metallic Copper Surfaces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01952-09
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.