The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Administration of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Breast Milk as an Alternative for the Treatment of Infectious Mastitis during Lactation
Open accessAbstract
In this study, 20 women with staphylococcal mastitis were randomly divided in two groups. Those in the probiotic group daily ingested 10 log 10 CFU of Lactobacillus salivarius CECT5713 and the same quantity of Lactobacillus gasseri CECT5714 for 4 weeks, while those in the control one only ingested the excipient. Both lactobacillus strains were originally isolated from breast milk. On day 0, the mean staphylococcal counts in the probiotic and control groups were similar (4.74 and 4.81 log 10 CFU/ml, respectively), but lactobacilli could not be detected. On day 30, the mean staphylococcal count in the probiotic group (2.96 log 10 CFU/ml) was lower than that of the control group (4.79 log 10 CFU/ml). L. salivarius CECT5713 and L. gasseri CECT5714 were isolated from the milk samples of 6 of the 10 women of the probiotic group. At day 14, no clinical signs of mastitis were observed in the women assigned to the probiotic group, but mastitis persisted throughout the study period in the control group women. In conclusion, L. salivarius CECT5713 and L. gasseri CECT5714 appear to be an efficient alternative for the treatment of lactational infectious mastitis during lactation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunne, C., O’Mahony, L., Murphy, L., Thornton, G., Morrissey, D., O’Halloran, S., Feeney, M., Flynn, S., Fitzgerald, G., Daly, C., et al. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s · Cited by 922
Human milk is a source of lactic acid bacteria for the infant gut
Martín, R., Langa, S., Reviriego, C., Jimínez, E., Marín, M. L., Xaus, J., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.09.028 · Cited by 792
Self-citationFoxman, B. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/155.2.103 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Breast milk, a source of beneficial microbes and associated benefits for infant health
Lyons, K. E., Ryan, C. A., Dempsey, E. M., Ross, R. P., & Stanton, C. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12041039 · Cited by 613
Vertical mother–neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding
Jost, T., Lacroix, C., Braegger, C. P., Rochat, F., & Chassard, C. (2014) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12238 · Cited by 580
Antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria
Cueva, C., Moreno-Arribas, M. V., Martín-Álvarez, P. J., Bills, G., Vicente, M. F., Basilio, A., Rivas, C. L., Requena, T., Rodríguez, J. M., & Bartolomé, B. (2010) · Research in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.04.006 · Cited by 578
Rodríguez, J. M. (2014) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.114.007229 · Cited by 454
Arroyo, R., Martín, V., Maldonado, A., Jiménez, E., Fernández, L., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2010) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/652763 · Cited by 361
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiménez, E., Fernández, L., Maldonado, A., Martín, R., Olivares, M., Xaus, J., & Rodríguez, J. M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4650-4655
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2152831493
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 3
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Administration of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Breast Milk as an Alternative for the Treatment of Infectious Mastitis during Lactation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.02599-07
- The paper
- Jiménez, E., Fernández, L., Maldonado, A., Martín, R., Olivares, M., Xaus, J., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2008). Oral Administration of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Breast Milk as an Alternative for the Treatment of Infectious Mastitis during Lactation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02599-07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
