The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov., an Asaccharolytic, Succinate-Utilizing Bacterium Isolated from Human Feces
Open accessAbstract
Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of the intestinal microorganisms are important for understanding the comprehensive physiology of the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract microbiota. Here, we isolated two novel bacterial strains, YIT 12067 T and YIT 12068, from the feces of healthy human adults. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that they belonged to the same species and were most closely related to Phascolarctobacterium faecium ACM 3679 T , with 91.4% to 91.5% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, respectively. Substrate availability tests revealed that the isolates used only succinate; they did not ferment any other short-chain fatty acids or carbohydrates tested. When these strains were cocultured with the xylan-utilizing and succinate-producing bacterium Paraprevotella xylaniphila YIT 11841 T , in medium supplemented with xylan but not succinate, their cell numbers became 2 to 3 orders of magnitude higher than those of the monoculture; succinate became undetectable, and propionate was formed. Database analysis revealed that over 200 uncultured bacterial clones from the feces of humans and other mammals showed high sequence identity (>98.7%) to YIT 12067 T . Real-time PCR analysis also revealed that YIT 12067 T -like bacteria were present in 21% of human fecal samples, at an average level of 3.34 × 10 8 cells/g feces. These results indicate that YIT 12067 T -like bacteria are distributed broadly in the GI tract as subdominant members that may adapt to the intestinal environment by specializing to utilize the succinate generated by other bacterial species. The phylogenetic and physiological properties of YIT 12067 T and YIT 12068 suggest that these strains represent a novel species, which we have designated Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human gut microbes associated with obesity
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441022a · Cited by 8,785
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
Molecular Analysis of Commensal Host-Microbial Relationships in the Intestine
Hooper, L. V., Wong, M. H., Thelin, A., Hansson, L., Falk, P. G., & Gordon, J. I. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5505.881 · Cited by 2,202
Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core
Tap, J., Mondot, S., Levenez, F., Pelletier, E., Caron, C., Furet, J., Ugarte, E., Muñoz‐Tamayo, R., Paslier, D. L. E., Nalin, R., et al. (2009) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01982.x · Cited by 927 · cited 1×
“On the other hand, for human resident gut microbiota, dietary carbohydrates that resist degradation in the upper intestinal tract are important energy sources (7), and most of the phylotypes frequently detected in the human GI tract seem to be closely related to species that have functions in carbohydrate catabolism (…”
BackgroundAnimal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle
Durso, L. M., Harhay, G. P., Smith, T. P. L., Bono, J. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Harhay, D. M., Andersen, G. L., Keen, J. E., Laegreid, W. W., & Clawson, M. L. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00207-10 · Cited by 168
McLaughlin, S. D., Walker, A. W., Churcher, C., Clark, S. K., Tekkis, P. P., Johnson, M. W., Parkhill, J., Ciclitira, P. J., Dougan, G., Nicholls, R. J., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181e3dc8b · Cited by 114
Cited by
Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota
Louis, P., & Flint, H. J. (2017) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13589 · Cited by 3,028
Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment
Morgan, X. C., Tickle, T. L., Sokol, H., Gevers, D., Devaney, K. L., Ward, D. V., Reyes, J. A., Shah, S. A., LeLeiko, N., Snapper, S. B., et al. (2012) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r79 · Cited by 2,713
Advances in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: linking host genetics and the microbiome
Knights, D., Lassen, K. G., & Xavier, R. J. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303954 · Cited by 468
Gut microbiota-derived succinate: Friend or foe in human metabolic diseases?
Fernández-Veledo, S., & Vendrell, J. (2019) · Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11154-019-09513-z · Cited by 308
McHardy, I. H., Li, X., Tong, M., Ruegger, P., Jacobs, J., Borneman, J., Anton, P., & Braun, J. (2013) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/2049-2618-1-26 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, Y., Nagai, F., & Morotomi, M.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2012-01-15
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 511-518
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W1989802059
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov., an Asaccharolytic, Succinate-Utilizing Bacterium Isolated from Human Feces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.06035-11
- The paper
- Watanabe, Y., Nagai, F., & Morotomi, M. (2012). Characterization of Phascolarctobacterium succinatutens sp. nov., an Asaccharolytic, Succinate-Utilizing Bacterium Isolated from Human Feces. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.06035-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.