Cited by 168Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle

Open access
Durso, Lisa M., Harhay, Gregory P., Smith, Timothy P. L., Bono, James L., DeSantis, Todd Z., Harhay, Dayna M., Andersen, Gary L., Keen, James E. +2 more·2010·Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota of beef cattle are important for animal health, food safety, and methane emissions. This full-length sequencing survey of 11,171 16S rRNA genes reveals animal-to-animal variation in communities that cannot be attributed to breed, gender, diet, age, or weather. Beef communities differ from those of dairy. Core bovine taxa are identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aem.00207-10

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Kanagawa, T. 2003. Bias and artifacts in multitemplate polymerase chain reaction. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96:317-323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [13]Nurmi, E., and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects in Salmonella infections in broiler production. Nature 241:210-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durso, L. M., Harhay, G. P., Smith, T. P. L., Bono, J. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Harhay, D. M., Andersen, G. L., Keen, J. E., Laegreid, W. W., & Clawson, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Durso, Lisa M.
Venue
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2010-07-15
Volume
76
Issue
14
Pages
4858-4862
ISSN
  • 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5336
OpenAlex
W2128415851
Cited by
168
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
25.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
beef cattle, gut microbiota, fecal microbiota, animal-to-animal variation, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, core microbiome, methane emissions, food safety, animal health
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Feces, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biodiversity, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review