The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved electroporation and cloning vector system for gram-positive bacteria
Open accessAbstract
A protocol for transformation of intact Enterococcus faecalis cells by electroporation was developed through a systematic examination of the effects of changes in various parameters, including (i) growth conditions; (ii) composition of the electroporation solution; (iii) electroporation conditions, such as field strength and resistance; (iv) size, concentration, and purity of DNA used for transformation; and (v) conditions used to select for transformants. Key features of this protocol include the use of exponential-phase cells grown in inhibitory concentrations of glycine and the use of an acidic sucrose electroporation solution. Frequencies of greater than 2 x 10(5) transformants per microgram of plasmid DNA were obtained for E. faecalis cells, whereas various strains of streptococci and Bacillus anthracis were transformed at frequencies of 10(3) to 10(4) transformants per microgram of plasmid DNA with the same protocol. A novel Escherichia coli-Streptococcus and Enterococcus shuttle cloning vector, pDL276, was constructed for use in conjunction with the electroporation system. This vector features a multiple cloning site region flanked by E. coli transcription termination sequences, a relatively small size (less than 7 kb), and a kanamycin resistance determinant expressed in both gram-positive and gram-negative hosts. Various enterococcal and streptococcal DNA sequences were cloned in E. coli (including sequences that could not be cloned on other vectors) and were returned to the original host by electroporation. The vector and electroporation system was also used to clone directly into E. faecalis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA
Birnboim, H. C., & Doly, J. (1979) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/7.6.1513 · Cited by 14,686
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Synthesis of glycerol phosphate lipoteichoic acid in Staphylococcus aureus
Gründling, A., & Schneewind, O. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701821104 · Cited by 301
Egland, P. G., Palmer, R. J., & Kolenbrander, P. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0407457101 · Cited by 256
Host and Symbiont Jointly Control Gut Microbiota during Complete Metamorphosis
Johnston, P. R., & Rolff, J. (2015) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005246 · Cited by 179
Consequences of a sortase A mutation in Streptococcus gordonii
Nobbs, A. H., Vajna, R. M., Johnson, J. R., Zhang, Y., Erlandsen, S. L., Oli, M. W., Kreth, J., Brady, L. J., & Herzberg, M. C. (2007) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/007252-0 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunny, G. M., Lee, L. N., & LeBlanc, D. J.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1194-1201
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2141533388
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved electroporation and cloning vector system for gram-positive bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.57.4.1194-1201.1991
- The paper
- Dunny, G. M., Lee, L. N., & LeBlanc, D. J. (1991). Improved electroporation and cloning vector system for gram-positive bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.57.4.1194-1201.1991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.