The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distribution of Bifidobacterial Species in Human Intestinal Microflora Examined with 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Species-Specific Primers
Open accessAbstract
In order to clarify the distribution of bifidobacterial species in the human intestinal tract, a 16S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific PCR technique was developed and used with DNAs extracted from fecal samples obtained from 48 healthy adults and 27 breast-fed infants. To cover all of the bifidobacterial species that have been isolated from and identified in the human intestinal tract, species-specific primers for Bifidobacterium longum , B. infantis , B. dentium , and B. gallicum were developed and used with primers for B. adolescentis , B. angulatum , B. bifidum , B. breve , and the B. catenulatum group ( B. catenulatum and B. pseudocatenulatum ) that were developed in a previous study (T. Matsuki, K. Watanabe, R. Tanaka, and H. Oyaizu, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 167:113–121, 1998). The specificity of the nine primers was confirmed by PCR, and the species-specific PCR method was found to be a useful means for identifying Bifidobacterium strains isolated from human feces. The results of an examination of bifidobacterial species distribution showed that the B. catenulatum group was the most commonly found taxon (detected in 44 of 48 samples [92%]), followed by B. longum and B. adolescentis , in the adult intestinal bifidobacterial flora and that B. breve , B. infantis , and B. longum were frequently found in the intestinal tracts of infants. The present study demonstrated that qualitative detection of the bifidobacterial species present in human feces can be accomplished rapidly and accurately.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Cited by
Ramirez-Farias, C., Slezak, K., Fuller, Z., Duncan, A., Holtrop, G., & Louis, P. (2008) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114508019880 · Cited by 822
Gastrointestinal Microflora Studies in Late‐Onset Autism
Finegold, S. M., Molitoris, D., Song, Y., Liu, C., Vaisanen, M., Bolte, E., McTeague, M., Sandler, R., Wexler, H., Marlowe, E. M., et al. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/341914 · Cited by 742
Malinen, E., Rinttila, T., Kajander, K., Matto, J., Kassinen, A., Krogius, L., Saarela, M., Korpela, R., & Palva, A. (2005) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40312.x · Cited by 699
Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the infant gastrointestinal microbiota
Zivkovic, A. M., German, J. B., Lebrilla, C. B., & Mills, D. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000083107 · Cited by 679
Gut Bifidobacteria Populations in Human Health and Aging
Arboleya, S., Watkins, C., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01204 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsuki, T., Watanabe, K., Tanaka, R., Fukuda, M., & Oyaizu, H.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4506-4512
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2107307462
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution of Bifidobacterial Species in Human Intestinal Microflora Examined with 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Species-Specific Primers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.65.10.4506-4512.1999
- The paper
- Matsuki, T., Watanabe, K., Tanaka, R., Fukuda, M., & Oyaizu, H. (1999). Distribution of Bifidobacterial Species in Human Intestinal Microflora Examined with 16S rRNA-Gene-Targeted Species-Specific Primers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.10.4506-4512.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.